Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I have not. I will probably do that
    • Based on ECP's previous, what will definitely happen is this. They will send more idiotic letters. After they will send a Letter of Claim, and it is essential that your brother replies at this point to this to show them he would be big trouble in court. Next it is highly likely (but not certain) that they will crawl back under their stone and that will be the end of the matter. The slight worry is that if they do do court it will seem a likely story to a judge that your brother has no connection to the ticket, when it was him who appealed and replied to the Letter of Claim.  Indeed I think it would seem the lot of you were playing games with ECP and with the court by getting unconnected people involved and then later deny they were involved. So be aware there is that slight risk. You talked about "a mess" in your first post, and you weren't wrong. Someone hires a car and gets a ticket.  There is an appeal.  Who appeals, the hirer?  No, the hirer's mate's son.  Obvious! There is an approach for help to a consumer website.  By the hirer?  No, by the hirer's mate's son's brother! This is so damn silly and totally avoidable. Anyway, it seems the decision has been made for your brother to carry the can so whatever consequences will ensue will ensue. 
    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Do I have any rights here with my employer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sure. BUT the company get the invoice and own the invoice and it is their decision to pay or not, not the OPS.

 

And his car contract undoubtedly says he is liable for it, usually plus an admin fee.

 

OP, you cannot offset bullying against skiving off!!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I agree and I am not saying that I am offsetting anything, also it does not make bulling ok either, as I am sure people who have been bullied at work will agree, and that you will do anything to skive if it gets you away from the bullying and by the way i WAS MERELY ASKING DO I HAVE TO PAY

Link to post
Share on other sites

The short answer is 'NO'. The ticket is not legal and cannot be enforced. A days pay is a con unless you were there the whole day. If you feel morally obliged to pay it, make it only for the time you were there minus the time it would have taken for you to service the car and have a coffee or meal if it was lunch break time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff, neither of us can make a valid judgement without knowing the exact working of any clause in the agreement between employer and employee about parking charges. We're both having a guess.

 

I suggest OP finds that and posts it up.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't pay it either, as I own my own car. But for a lot of lease cars, they are paid automatically by the lease company and the charge passed back as a contract term as they CBA messing about with the paperwork. It's in the T&Cs.

 

Right OP - dig out your paperwork and let's hear what it says :)

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I would usually say that the parking Co. could go whistle, if the OP is waiting on a reference from his company for his new job, I'm not sure that it's worth potentially jeopardising his employment over this.

 

What about writing back to them suggesting that you'll pay back the amount of time you were with your friend rather than the whole day, and cover the parking fee? Bottom line, is it worth paying something just to put the whole experience to bed and move on, rather than get into a protracted argument about it?

 

How much are the invoices for, by the way?

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havew a company car and it is in the contract that any fines will be paid by the company and I will re inburse them, altough this isnt a fine and dosnt have to be paid if the company have paid it they are withun their rights if it is in the contarct to invoice the OP, also you have to be at a services for over 2 hours before a penalty is issued so just how long was the OP there? Just pay it to avoid arguments

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally speaking...

 

1. If the OP was sent the fine directly = OP doesn't need to pay as its an unlawful speculative invoice.

 

2. If the OP's company was sent the fine and they've paid it already:

a. If they have the contractual right, the employer can recoup this from the OP.

b. If they don't have the contractual right, they can't.

 

Basically, regardless of whether the invoice is legally enforceable, if the company have chosen to pay it then if they have the contractual right, they can legitimately claim it back from the OP as they've already suffered a financial loss as a result of the OP's actions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally speaking...

 

 

 

1. If the OP was sent the fine directly = OP doesn't need to pay as its an unlawful speculative invoice.

 

 

 

2. If the OP's company was sent the fine and they've paid it already:

 

a. If they have the contractual right, the employer can recoup this from the OP.

 

b. If they don't have the contractual right, they can't.

 

 

 

Basically, regardless of whether the invoice is legally enforceable, if the company have chosen to pay it then if they have the contractual right, they can legitimately claim it back from the OP as they've already suffered a financial loss as a result of the OP's actions.

 

 

 

 

I would write to your former company and tell them to give the parking company your name and address and you will sort that bit out yourself. you can then not pay the fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havew a company car and it is in the contract that any fines will be paid by the company and I will re inburse them, altough this isnt a fine and dosnt have to be paid if the company have paid it they are withun their rights if it is in the contarct to invoice the OP, also you have to be at a services for over 2 hours before a penalty is issued so just how long was the OP there? Just pay it to avoid arguments

 

Contracts are often specific in that FINES can be recovered, and a PCN from a private company is able to be challenged on that basis - as is an admin fee, for whether specified or not, depending on the size of it this may well represent an unlawful penalty rather than being purely an 'admin' fee.

 

We have had a number of our staff with hire cars where the rental company paid a PPC charge and then levied a £25 admin fee, but were able to get both back on that basis.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much do you need this recent employers reference? Anyone leaving a company after a matter of months is obviously not happy there so any reference other than the cursory employers reference is meaningless. No employer would put on a reference that they believed you were skiving on your last days there, nor would they put that you left without paying a speculative parking charge to a motorway service area because theyknow very well that they would end up in an ET or high court for doing so.

I think you are worrying too much about what sounds like sour grapes from a bad employer. As stated, the parking charge is an unenforceable speculative invoice that has no legal substance and your ex-employer cannot ask you for your salary back. Let them sue you if they really think that they are right and we can all read about it in the papers when they make fools of themselves and go out of business in the aftermath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...