Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Forgive my ignorance but I assume take out dates would be when next payment is usually due? Jacamo is the 10th of each month Vanquis is usually the 6th or 7th of each month
    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit Reforms Under Threat after IT Glitch


Dilizjo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

IDS needs a reality check - pay him for 3 months on the 'top earning benefit rate' under the new system and see how he can manage - with no access to any other wealth generating income.

 

I think all MPs should, as part of their MP training, work for 6 months in the NHS at a non-management role and then have 6 months on benefits, that way we might start getting a system which works for people, rather than against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IDS needs a reality check - pay him for 3 months on the 'top earning benefit rate' under the new system and see how he can manage - with no access to any other wealth generating income.

 

I think all MPs should, as part of their MP training, work for 6 months in the NHS at a non-management role and then have 6 months on benefits, that way we might start getting a system which works for people, rather than against them.

 

I think for anyone to be selected as a candidate to run for MP, they should have done 1000 hours volunteer work in total, with the underprivileged - it should be the law. That way we'l stop having upper class idiots representing us who know nothing about real life - they can still be MP's, but only if they've done the work.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been involved in several non government IT changes and it is an absolute nightmare. I suspect many of you have as well. You have many 'workarounds' to do, to ensure that you have the correct records, payments and documents. I have been on the frontline taking calls, complaints and also working with IT specialists to resolve problems. The DWP staff will certainly earn their money and there will be plenty of overtime going.

 

When the universal benefit system goes live, they will be testing it on small volumes of people and it will take 3 years to be fully introduced.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a place I worked at was trying to integrate the different systems their departments used into one 'windows' style system. By the time I moved on 3 years later, they had gone through two IT companies and seemed no nearer to going live.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think for anyone to be selected as a candidate to run for MP, they should have done 1000 hours volunteer work in total, with the underprivileged - it should be the law. That way we'l stop having upper class idiots representing us who know nothing about real life - they can still be MP's, but only if they've done the work.

 

By the sounds of things, they should also spend 6 months deploying major IT systems for large organisations.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But of course those of us who will have to work with the new system and are doubtful of it working wouldn't be listened to when we voiced our concerns!

 

We said that HMRC wouldface problems when they introduced Tax Credits back in 2002/3, we were told to shut up but were proved right in the end and I still don't believe that the IT system works correctly.

 

Wait until the 19th when Universal Jobmatch starts, that is not due to be tested until Weds so no time at all to iron out any of the obligitory glitches that always happen!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But of course those of us who will have to work with the new system and are doubtful of it working wouldn't be listened to when we voiced our concerns!

 

We said that HMRC wouldface problems when they introduced Tax Credits back in 2002/3, we were told to shut up but were proved right in the end and I still don't believe that the IT system works correctly.

 

Wait until the 19th when Universal Jobmatch starts, that is not due to be tested until Weds so no time at all to iron out any of the obligitory glitches that always happen!

 

They never listen to the workers in the trenches, who actually know something about these things - unlike IDS.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't insult the insane please I'm one of them

 

dpick

Ah! But you are not the SSWP

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that a lot of politicians actually do want to do good they just do not get it,or get corrupted by the system. People who complain that politicians are born to rule in my opinion just have a chip on their shoulder. Labour are just as bad as the Tories but alas i think it's the world we live in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we can all predict what is going to happen - IT glitches or not the government will push ahead with Universal Credit so around October next year there are going to be thousands of people being paid the wrong amount of money. Inevitably in most cases this will be too little, or none at all, but even those paid too much will be in trouble when it's deducted from their next payment or they get investigated for fraud.

 

I suspect a lot of charities and food banks are already gearing up for the rush.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Personnel and Technology Glitch:

 

Seem to remember another previous round of ill thought out and rushed legislation;

 

Err ...... Err ...... Oh yes, something called, 'employment and support allowance'. :mmph:

 

Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

they spend 2 billion (and upwards counting) to reduce benefit payments, sort of proves they dont care about the actual budget but more about just making life harder for those dependent on social security.

 

I would hazard a guess if the DWP budget remained the same but instead of going to claimants but to private companies for profit the government would see it as a job well done.

 

eg. the changes to housing benefit for 25-35 year olds which is wrecking lives saved around 300 million, this is less than the overshoot of the budget which seems to be ignored by the government and a fraction of the overall universal credit budget. Its not about saving money its about the money been spent where they want it to be spent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if once all the IB reassessments are complete, the government ever released details of exactly how much it has cost and how much has been saved, I would be amazed if it's saved even one penny. More likely the cost of the assessments, extra staff to deal with the paperwork, appeals and compensation for all the cock ups will be far more than kicking some sick people off onto JSA can ever save, and I doubt PIP or Universal Credit or anything else is going to do any better.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gets me when I was working in IT if I had been heading up such a program as is IDS I would have had the boot long ago it would seem another example of one rule for us another for the plebs of the world.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

let's all pray to our gods that it does fail. If it does not there are going to be an awful lot of people going hungry and cold or even being put out on the streets.

 

All these reforms are costing billions more than they save. It is all a drive to destroy the welfare state and put money in the pockets of their buddies (after all when they all lose their jobs the MPs will need their new cushy jobs).

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the words of the song 'there may be trouble ahead'.......... the DWP are bracing themselves for a huge backlash from the media when the Work Programme figures are finally published on the 27th Nov, unless they have completely cooked the books, the figures will show that the WP is a dismal failure and a waste of public money.

 

UC is way over budget and at least a year behind schedule, the head honcho's in charge of rolling out the system are leaving in droves or going long term sick. IDS may be riding a wave at the moment but it's his head that will roll when this train finally comes off the rails.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

legal aid isnt going away next year, the house of lords got some ammendments.

 

http://www.justice-for-all.org.uk/News/Legal-Aid-Bill-round-up

 

Hmmm:

 

 

Legal aid was retained for welfare benefit appeals to the second tier

tribunal and higher courts, and for the first tier tribunal on 'points of law'

only. The details will be worked out in a statutory instrument

 

Well any appeals worker will be appealling to first tier on a point of law - they're hardly going to say 'well we're appealling coz we don't like the decision'

 

The difficulty will be for advice agencies to stay open without the level of funding they used to have from the LSC. My old employer was struggling to stay open 3 years ago, unless they get some new source of funding, they will probably have to close - and they provide top quality advice for the county (even CAB refers lots of cases to them).

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...