Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Article from Insolvency News - Fee charging DMPs more likely to fail?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Article from Insolvency News

 

http://www.insolvencynews.com/article/14524/corporate/fee-charging-dmps-more-likely-to-fail

 

Could it really be true?

 

Bet the fee chargers wont agree.

 

I would be more likely to go with the Insolvency News article

 

The article also touches on a few other interesting points.

 

Strange though no mention of DIY DMPs, maybe they forgot

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiThe full MAT report was published today and as ever it reveals a different picture to the press release. The full report also covers DIY DMP's too.If you're in the mood for research, take a look at the DEMSA research published last week at:http://www.demsa.co.uk/demsa-news/grant-thornton-produces-independent-study-into-fee-charging-debt-management-market Eg Researchers found that just 17% of DEMSA members’ annual revenue is sourced from DMP set-up fees, highlighting debt management companies’ interest in the long term sustainability of DMPs.Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiThe full MAT report was published today and as ever it reveals a different picture to the press release. The full report also covers DIY DMP's too.If you're in the mood for research, take a look at the DEMSA research published last week at:http://www.demsa.co.uk/demsa-news/grant-thornton-produces-independent-study-into-fee-charging-debt-management-market Eg Researchers found that just 17% of DEMSA members’ annual revenue is sourced from DMP set-up fees, highlighting debt management companies’ interest in the long term sustainability of DMPs.Nick

 

Hi Nick, its been a while, but nice to see you back again:)

 

Thanks for the info .I will check it out

 

It is all set to get really interesting my friend, do you agree?

 

The stats game will no doubt go into overdrive on all sides

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nick, its been a while, but nice to see you back again:)

 

Thanks for the info .I will check it out

 

It is all set to get really interesting my friend, do you agree?

 

The stats game will no doubt go into overdrive on all sides

 

So good to be back! I may not have been posting but Ive been keeping my eye on you all , rest assured.What with the recent DRF research, the DEMSA work and the reports by MAT there are plenty of stats for even the most ardent stats fan.It will be interesting to see the next steps in the DMP protocol. Expect news in the not too distant future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So good to be back! I may not have been posting but Ive been keeping my eye on you all , rest assured.What with the recent DRF research, the DEMSA work and the reports by MAT there are plenty of stats for even the most ardent stats fan.It will be interesting to see the next steps in the DMP protocol. Expect news in the not too distant future.

 

Hi Nick

 

Have we behaved ourselves to your liking Nick, some of us can be rascals at times, its true I know, but we mean well.

 

Come on Nick, give us a sneak preview on the protocol, the suspense is getting too much, we are going to find out anyway or perhaps some of us already know:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nick

 

Have we behaved ourselves to your liking Nick, some of us can be rascals at times, its true I know, but we mean well.

 

Come on Nick, give us a sneak preview on the protocol, the suspense is getting too much, we are going to find out anyway or perhaps some of us already know:)

 

I can't give too many details I'm afraid for 2 reasons. Firstly the final draft has not yet gone to the Minister and secondly we have only seen and commented on drafts from the Insolvency Service circulated to us via DEMSA and we were given this ona confidential basis.What is in the public domain is that none of the not for profit charties or for profit/free to consumer companies is willing to sign up to the protocol as it stands. The reasons they give for this (you can ask CA HQ I assume) and the reasons I think this is the case are perhaps at odds. Personally I think that the level of external audit we current undergo as DEMSA members is far more intrusive and probing than many free networks would submit to &/or have the funds to pay for. This auditing is likely to be a key feature of the protocol. Assuming the final draft that I've seen is accepted by the Minister I think it will be a real step forward for consumers.Sorry to be so cloak and dagger but I'm not at liberty to say more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't give too many details I'm afraid for 2 reasons. Firstly the final draft has not yet gone to the Minister and secondly we have only seen and commented on drafts from the Insolvency Service circulated to us via DEMSA and we were given this ona confidential basis.What is in the public domain is that none of the not for profit charties or for profit/free to consumer companies is willing to sign up to the protocol as it stands. The reasons they give for this (you can ask CA HQ I assume) and the reasons I think this is the case are perhaps at odds. Personally I think that the level of external audit we current undergo as DEMSA members is far more intrusive and probing than many free networks would submit to &/or have the funds to pay for. This auditing is likely to be a key feature of the protocol. Assuming the final draft that I've seen is accepted by the Minister I think it will be a real step forward for consumers.Sorry to be so cloak and dagger but I'm not at liberty to say more.

 

Thanks for that Nick

 

It does seem to be dragging on a bit by the sound of things:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I can't give too many details I'm afraid for 2 reasons. Firstly the final draft has not yet gone to the Minister and secondly we have only seen and commented on drafts from the Insolvency Service circulated to us via DEMSA and we were given this ona confidential basis.What is in the public domain is that none of the not for profit charties or for profit/free to consumer companies is willing to sign up to the protocol as it stands. The reasons they give for this (you can ask CA HQ I assume) and the reasons I think this is the case are perhaps at odds. Personally I think that the level of external audit we current undergo as DEMSA members is far more intrusive and probing than many free networks would submit to &/or have the funds to pay for. This auditing is likely to be a key feature of the protocol. Assuming the final draft that I've seen is accepted by the Minister I think it will be a real step forward for consumers.Sorry to be so cloak and dagger but I'm not at liberty to say more.

 

Hi again Nick

 

Have you seen this article?

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/money/personal-finance/dodgy-debt-management-firms-ripping-1446979

 

It is a fascinating read given some of the things you have put regarding the new protocol, especially the parts in the article that mention Payplan and what John Fairhurst has to say (he's got it right if you ask me)

 

I and quite a few more cant wait to see this new protocol to be honest, do you think we ever will though? after reading the mirror article, well, I am not so sure yer know!

 

It is nearly Christmas and we are still waiting:)

Edited by Wintry
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wintry, yes I did see the Mirror article. I think the BBA website makes interesting reading on this.

 

“Discussing Debt Management Plan protocols at BIS

 

We met with BIS Minister Jo Swinson on Wednesday to discuss the progress of the creditor and debt management industries in agreeing a protocol to improve practices among free and fee-charging debt management providers. Whilst the minister welcomed the commitment displayed by the BBA and the fee-charging providers in producing a workable protocol, she encouraged the free advice sector to overcome its reluctance to participate and for all parties to make further efforts to finalise a protocol that puts the interests of consumers first. The BBA will continue to work with BIS and other stakeholders to achieve the minister's aims”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ps, yes I think there will be a protocol and I hope that all providers agree to abide by it. Organisations dealing with customers, some with over 100k customers on DMPs, need the same level of external audit and compliance monitoring that some providers in the sector already submit to. The risk to consumers of firms failing and or using the client account may be slight but consumers deserve protection whoever the provider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ps, yes I think there will be a protocol and I hope that all providers agree to abide by it. Organisations dealing with customers, some with over 100k customers on DMPs, need the same level of external audit and compliance monitoring that some providers in the sector already submit to. The risk to consumers of firms failing and or using the client account may be slight but consumers deserve protection whoever the provider.

 

Hi Nick

 

For some reason Im still up and wide awake instead of lying in bed watching DVDs of the greatest TV detective series of all time - the sorely missed Mr Peter Falk as Lt Columbo.

 

Now I mention Columbo as the way this protocol is going we will probably need someone like him to solve what has happened to it or to actually find it.

 

Its not gonna happen is it Nick?

 

Not this year anyway:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...