Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arden and recon on lombard direct loan.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4065 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a CCA and was given a recon with

no name;

no address;

no T&C's;

no interest rate

 

- nothing.

 

I challenged it and this is the response

- verbatim - which I received this afternoon - any help would be appreciated cos I am fuming!

Also - thier figures do not add up - they say we owe them 1,800 but when I went through the statement

they sent me they had missed off TWO years of payments at least! We actually owe them just over 1k.

 

letter from them -

 

"Further to my letter f 1 November 2012. I have now investigated your complaint fully and in line with our Complaints Proceedure.

I am in a position to provide you with a final response. Our investigation has highlighted that we do not uphold your complaint.

 

To enable you to understand the reasons for this decision, I would like to take you through the facts of the investigations and share the conclusions with you.

 

Our Investigation

 

On the 24 October 2012 we responded to your request for a copy of your loan agreement.

In compliance with your request pursuant to Section 77 of the CCA we enclosed a reconstituted copy of the executed Credit Agreement

and a statement of account.

 

In accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 it is acceptable to supply you with a reconstituted copy as the creditor

or owner may not have preserved a copy of the executed agreement.

 

The requirement allows us not to provide an exact copy, a carbon photocopy or microfiche copy and we can therefore provide a reconstituted copy.

 

Our Findings

 

We are confident that all our agreements are properly executed and not open to challenge.

 

Even if, which is denied, the agreement is improperly executed then all requisite Schedule 6 information is included sufficient to allow the court to permit enforcement.

 

You must take whatever action you conside necessary,

 

however, we will not be releasing you from any obligation.

 

Furthermore, a request made under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act is not a provision to remove liability

and if you believe that the above agreement was not entered into by you and therefore believe fraud to have take place,

you should report this to your local police station.

 

The current balance is £1813.43 which remains outstanding.

 

If however you are experiencing financial difficulties please contact our office so that we may discuss mutually agreed repayment proposals.

 

Please note that,

under the terms of our Complaints Proceedure, this is our final response.

 

If you are dissatisfied with it, you may refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

You need to do this within 6 months from the date of this letter.

For more information please read the enclosed guide 'Your Complaint and the Ombudsman'.

 

The address of the Financial Ombudsman Service is:

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

South Quay Plaza

183 Marsh Wall

London

E12 9SR

 

I also enclose a copy of our internal Compliants Proceedure for your information.

 

Once again, we are sorry for the inconvenience we caused you and hope you will find that the points above offer a fair resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

do you know what debt this is?

 

is it showing on your CRA file?

 

how old is the debt?

 

when was it originally taken out?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A recon MUST have the name and addresss of the debtor at the inception of the account,

the name and address of the original creditor.

The terms and conditions (complete) in force at the inception of the account.

All variations on the terms and coditions during the life of the account.

The terms and conditions current or at closure of the account.

A statement of the account should be included.

 

I would go to the ombudsman!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan was taken out years and years ago - I don't know the original amount.

 

It was defaulted on in 2004.

 

I will check the CRA to see, but it probably no longer shows.

 

How can i prove them wrong with regard to the recon?

 

Honestly - the one they sent us was just a blank copy of any old credit agreement you can find on application forms.

 

How can I call their bluff and what will happen if they take me to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the debt was taken out prior to 2007

 

they WILL need the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT

to go to court.

 

end of.

 

how long have you been paying arden?

 

something smells here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES!!

 

NO CCA = NO PAY = sadly you apprear to have been cash cowed

 

stop paying them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd just send the failure to comply letter

then ignore them

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dca section on the right

 

after

 

green library tab top left

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this ok?

 

Thank you for your letter of 7th November2012, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of theoriginal Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On both October 2nd 2012 andOctober 22nd 2012 I made a formal request for a true signedagreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/78. Thiswas signed for as delivered on or before October 25th 2012.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered defaulton 8th November 2012 (12+2 working days after you made the initialrequest).

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executedagreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required termsand statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as definedin section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If theexecuted agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are alsoobliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement ofthis account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits tothe account – and there are significant gaps in the recording of the paymentsmade.

 

Furthermore, you are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working daysfor a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out beforeyou/your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become currently unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy ofthe said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to senda full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentationrequested. You will also be aware of the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT's guidelines ondebt collection which state under the titleDeceptive and/or unfair methods - Examples of unfair practices are as follows -2.8

 

(i) - 'Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when adebt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wronglypursued'

 

(k) - 'Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonablequeried or disputed debt'

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFULand VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawfulharassment.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authoritiesas I see fit.

You have 21 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentionsto resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you. This should be in writing, I have no wishto correspond by telephone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems silly to state that they have "failed to respond" when they have responded...

 

I would also add "Account in Dispute" as a title.

 

Is this ok?

 

Thank you for your letter of 7th November2012, the contents of which have been noted.

 

Your response does not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

On both October 2nd 2012 andOctober 22nd 2012 I made a formal request for a true signedagreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/78. Thiswas signed for as delivered on or before October 25th 2012.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered defaulton 8th November 2012 (12+2 working days after you made the initialrequest).

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executedagreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required termsand statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as definedin section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If theexecuted agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are alsoobliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement ofthis account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits tothe account – and there are significant gaps in the recording of the paymentsmade.

 

Furthermore, you are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working daysfor a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out beforeyou/your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become currently unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy ofthe said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to senda full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentationrequested. You will also be aware of the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT's guidelines ondebt collection which state under the titleDeceptive and/or unfair methods - Examples of unfair practices are as follows -2.8

 

(i) - 'Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when adebt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wronglypursued'

 

(k) - 'Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonablequeried or disputed debt'

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFULand VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawfulharassment.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authoritiesas I see fit.

You have 21 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentionsto resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you. This should be in writing, I have no wishto correspond by telephone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO i would not tell them nor change anything.

 

they know full well why they have failed

 

if not

 

let them work it out.

 

leave the letter as the template.

 

make sure it has a lkine at the top

 

i do not acknowledge any dent to your company.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes we all bang heads with these people

 

debt

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have sent a final response, why correspond with them at all.

 

I would never tell a DCA what is wrong or what they have to do to put it right.

 

The recon may be a pile of tosh but if you tell them they could put that right and then they would have complied.

 

Should this ever go to court (which I doubt) you need to be able to convince the judge that you did not sign an agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to reclaim the default/penalty charges applied (and interest on those charges). Have a read of the BCOBS articles in my signature - highlighted in green.. is this company "Treating you Fairly".. if not, then you can make a complaint, first to the company and if no resolution.. take your complaint to the Ombudsman.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - their response - shall I simply ignore?

 

"As per our previous response dated 7 November 2012 a copy of which is enclosed, our position has not changed in relation to this matter.

 

Unfortunately, we do not hold the original agreement.

 

We have, however, provided you with a reconstituted copy, in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act, regulation 3 (2), which expressely states that a copy need not be an exact copy.

 

We are well aware of the principles under section 61 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act and we are confident that all our agreements are properly executed and not open to challenge.

 

Even if, which is denied, the agreement is improperly executed then all requisite Schedule 6 information is included sufficient to allow the court to permit enforcement.

 

Given this, we believe any application you make will fail, even if it did not, the courts do not have jurisdiction to order reimbursement of amounts already paid.

 

As we have issued our final response in this matter, and our position has not changed, we will not be releasing you from any liability with regards to the above account."

 

1) the recon has no name; credit amount; interst rates - nada

2) Their 'statement' was wildly inaccurate and missed out payments we have made to them totalling £2,255.

 

 

What do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A reconstituted agreement MUST Have the name and address of the Creditor, the name and address of the debtor at the time of the inception of the account.

 

The terms and conditions of the agreement at inception and any variations during the life of the agreement and the t&cs at the termiation/closure of the account.

Interest rates.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...