Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northampton CC Claim form received - can someone help please?


flinko
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have received a claim from "Britannica recoveries - S.A.R.L Arrows" regarding a £2500 ish loan or credit card (cant remember which) from the early 2000s which I last made a payment on in 2006 or 2007 (I think but not sure)

 

I currently have probably around 40k debts in total of the same nature (incl one 20k business overdraft debt which I dont think im liable for anyway) but this is the 1st claim that has been made. Having read 2 similar threads (cant post them as I havent made 10 posts yet) it seems that the 1st thing to do is to send a CPR to Britannica recoveries to find out more about the debt?

 

I was hoping for these debts to eventually go statute barred since the last I had to do with any of it was over 4 years ago, but seems they are keen to recover some! I have moved back in with my mother since 2008 so any letters/notifications may still be going to my old address.

 

Is sending a CPR the right thing to do here, as in the other 2 quoted threads above? many thanks in advance.

Edited by flinko
Link to post
Share on other sites

? statute bar is 6 years eng and wales, 5 in the breakaway republic.

can you post up their claim details, less any identifiables.

they would prob be entitled to use last known address if not advised otherwise.

stick to all court deadlines. if defending then acknowledge, with intention to defend, within the 14 days.

cpr 31.14, 18 request may be worth doing, but is likely small claims so they may refuse on that even though it has not been tracked yet. still could be worth doing though.

is there any missold ppi involved? have you previously done a sar?

 

PS, need to find out when last payment was if was in 2006.

also, can round up claim amounts.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Claimant

Brittanica Recoveries SARL

 

Address for payments

Shoosmith LLP

 

1. The claimant's claim for the sum of 2423.28 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated agreement between the defendant and Egg (No. 128*****) and assigned to the claimant on 10/05/11, notice of which has been provided to the defendant

 

2 . The defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974

 

3. The claimant claims the sum of 2423.28

 

4. C has complied, as far as is necessary with the pre-action conduct practice direction

 

I doubt I had PPI as I never took it out with anything.

I don't think i've ever done a SAR.

 

What should I do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sending a Subject Access Request to Egg would let you know what type of debt it is and whether any charges could be reclaimed, should also let you know the score regarding payments made on the account.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think Egg got sold a few years ago and accounts sold to different companies? Yorkshire Building Society maybe - im not sure, Could I not send a SAR to the people who are chasing the debt (Brittanica)? If not, how could I find out who owns the part of Egg that this claim is for (load/credit card etc)?

 

And also, do I reply anything to Northampton CC in the 1st instance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ownership has transfered to Barclays since and there is a dedicated Egg team that deals with SAR requests etc. Yorkshire BSoc is Mortgages and savings accounts only.

 

Found this.

 

Egg credit cards were transferred to Barclaycard in November 2011. You can contact Barclaycard on 0844 811 9111 or at www.mybarclaycard.co.uk. If your card was closed before November 2011 or was not transferred to Barclaycard, please contact Canada Square Operations (formerly known as Egg Banking plc) at the following address:

Canada Square Operations

PO Box 4903

Worthing

BN99 3AR

You can acknowledge the court claim online and that you will defend in full. You have to acknowledge within 14 days and then you have a further 14 days to submit your defence. It is only when you get an allocation questionaire for a hearing that you then ask for this at your nearest county court.

You need to send two CPR letters to Brittanica

CPR 31.14 requesting any forms mentioned in the POC. e.g credit agreement, notice of assignment.

Also CPR part 18 request to ask any question pertinent to the POC.

These are two separate requests, so will need to be in two separate documents, but can be sent in the same envelope. Because the amount is less than £5k, it will be the small claims track, so they may say that these CPR requests do not apply to the Northampton bulk process, but you have a right to the information that they are using for their claim.

 

Britannica/SARL may not be able to provide the documents, so may have trouble proceeding, so it is important that you push them to provide the documents they need to provide to the court. e.g Original credit agreement or a copy of the original, default notices etc.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ever so much unclebulgaria - will get on with this on Monday!

I will send a SAR to the Worthing address I think as a) im not sure if this is a card or loan and b) if it was a card then it would have been closed back in 2007-2009 I would think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is in the POCs..........

 

"1. The claimant's claim for the sum of 2423.28 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated agreement between the defendant and Egg (No. 128*****) and assigned to the claimant on 10/05/11, notice of which has been provided to the defendant".

 

Wouldn't the “(No. 128****)” after “Egg” be the account number? I mean do I still need to send a CPR part 18 to request the account number if that is the account number?

If I still need to send the CPR18 then is this worded correctly?

 

To: Britannica Recoveries S.A.R.L - Arrow (claimant) Please answer the following questions:

 

1. What date is shown as the date the Defendants account was transferred from Egg to the Claimant on the Deed of assignment?

2. What is the Egg account number shown on the Deed as being the Defendants account?...................... the formatting of the post is not following what im actually typing sorry!

Edited by Andyorch
Formatted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Only you would know if that is the account number flinko.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sent a cpr 31.14 2Weeks ago giving them 7 days to respond and have had no response.

Called shoosmith and spoke to the claim handler who started that my request had been forwarded to the claimant who will be now dealing with it internally. What should I do now, proceed with n244 or allow more time? The 28 days are up next Tuesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi flinko

 

You will have to submit a defence and on time otherwise judgment by default will apply.What was your thinking with regards to a N244 application?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I put a defence in 1st and then once time has elapsed try to get it struck off with N244? Defence based around the fact that I have had no docs sent to me to support the claim (and the particulars) and thus I don't actually know what the claim is for etc and therefore am unable to plead It was issued on the 5th so I have a week or so left until the 28 days are up (+ 5days of course)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant make application for none disclosure you must defend then steer the Court to strike out for none compliance (even more so in Small Claims) They must disclose anyway further into the process otherwise their claim will fail.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you advise, or direct me somewhere I can find out, what I should base my defence on please if not non-disclosure? I was planning to submit it online via MCOL, seems easiest method. By the lack of response from them I can only assume they don't have any documentary evidence to back up their Particulars of claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A defence simply admits or refutes the P.o.C but there has to be a dispute..reason... triable issue as to why you have defended.The none disclosure will be dealt with later in the process..as stated above there will come a point were the Claimant must disclose to verify its claim.

If the debt is simply not yours...then state that fact.If the debt is yours but you do not agree with the amount or you have reasons to mitigate their pleadings then state that and without sight of documentation to verify the amount claimed you are unable to plead effectively.

This is regarded as an holding Defence (holding the claim).

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't admit or refute because I don't know and there has been no evidence provided to say what its for even, let alone anything else. I have had a credit card AND a loan in the past with Egg (not with the claimant of course) but cannot remember how they were settled, if at all. So do I enter a "unable to defend" plea or something? (until I DO get evidence of what it's for) I Don't really understand how I can admit to or defend something when I don't even know what it is for and haven't been shown any documentary evidence regarding any agreement made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then submit an holding defence but draft it in a way that does not scream " this is a defence because of none disclosure " state that you are unsure of the debt and have requested information via a CPR request dated xxxxxx the claimant has refused to respond or clarify the claim and you are unable to plead with any particularity.There are plenty of examples of holding defences littered around the forum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...