Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hey guys,   Update: I have done as Eric suggested, however have had no response yet from courts.   Good news is that I received a letter from CEL last night and it states that the claimant discontinues proceedings for the whole of this claim!    Looks like they got a bit scared of the bill  I will double check with courts today to ensure this is true.    Again, this is 2/2 cases I have won against CEL with CAG help!!!! Thank you to everyone involved and I have one more to fight! 
    • Complete joke, trying to access the Moneyclaim online using the case number and password which is on the court papers and unable due to case number or password wrong. They are 100% same as on paperwork, we accessed to submit AOS now unable to submit defence,     
    • Hello, Some might remember me I put up a post about buying a seat leon,   Anyway it has caused me hell!!   So I had a new dual mass flywheel and clutch fitted by   Formula one auto center    A couple of days later my clutch is slipping and making noises and smells, so I took it back to the garage and they have offered repair it free of charge under Warranty,   I have told them I had trouble getting the car into them for the whole day the first time they fixed it and I need my car,   I have asked them to provide a courtesy car but they refuse to provide it.   Under consumer rights act 2015    Page 23   paragraph 2   (A) do so within a reasonable time and without significant inconvenience to the consumer and,    (B) bear any necessary costs incurred in doing so (including in particular the cost of any labour, materials and postage)   They must cover the cost of this?   Thanks again    
    • images/posts removed . please do not post jpg picture images directly to a post . read upload and redact in jpg then convert using on of the listed websites there to convert to one multipage pdf only . that way only logged-in,registered and approved caggers are the only ones that can download and see them . else anyone can see them caggers or not. dx
    • OK, I will do now.   I did look to black out certain things, but I was not sure what I should and should not redact and there was nothing on there that was personal enough for me to be concerned with being made public. So I am happy for all to view, but if you are kind enough to redact what is needed as per the forum rules, that would be amazing.     I was planning on collecting up other court cases they have lost, to refer to as part of my evidence, I'm not sure if this is worth doing or could just confuse matters?   But there seem to be many where the judge has ruled against them because of confusing and not clearly displayed signage, trespass, as well as their charge being £100, which is more than the Bevis case said was reasonable.    A quick search found this article as one example KBT cornwall lose case article.pdf   Lastly, I will go to the site to get updated images, but from google earth, you can see from the pictures the entrance states it is for the hotel parking, which I follwed instructions and gave my details to the hotel. Where I think my car was parked (it was that long ago I'm not exactly sure) there are signs on the opposite wall, but it was 12.30am, pitch black and they could not be seen.           Claimants_WS.pdf
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2579 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Can you point to the source of your information that makes you believe the legislation has not been "activated".

 

I am also not familiar with any enacted legislation lies "fallow" until it is activated.

 

There is nothing in the TCEA 2007 that confirms anything that is being said on this thread or it is to be "activated", "implemented" or it must lie "fallow".

 

Im finding this interpretation of the TCEA rather bizarre.

 

surfer01 with all due respect I asked for the source of information someone (who has already given wrong advice on another thread) made a statement the TCEA 2007 needs to be "implemented".

 

It is only fair for MBeaumont to see the source of that information.

 

I dont think it useful to make remarks assuming I have an "agenda" and "twisting things".

Edited by TB Law

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As per my post #45, can you point to the source of your facts you have quoted.

 

Im sure others reading this thread are in the same boat as me, but I am unfamiliar with an Act of Parliament being "implemented" even though it has been enacted.

 

 

Enacted = To make into law.[/QUO

 

An Act is made up of several sections ...not all sections have yet been implemented (enacted into the act)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As per my post #45, can you point to the source of your facts you have quoted.

 

Im sure others reading this thread are in the same boat as me, but I am unfamiliar with an Act of Parliament being "implemented" even though it has been enacted.

 

 

Enacted = To make into law.[/QUO

 

An Act is made up of several sections ...not all sections have yet been implemented (enacted into the act)

 

what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When an Act is passed sometimes it is implemented in phases, as was the intention in the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act where provisions were rolled out to a timetable, here the same sort of things apply, Section 12 and its implementation are dependant on the MOJ interpretation of the consultation into the enforcement industry, and the proposals, amongst them the one the bailiffs wanted that would land all debtors including the vulnerable with an extra £305 rather than £24.50 at the bailiffs first call. The proposals will be considered in the light of the responses, including the excellent one submitted by tomtubby, and changes incorporated into the Bill. That is what is meant by WD and TT.

 

Quoted from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/section/62

 

 

"There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. Help about Changes to LegislationClose status warningsChanges and effects yet to be applied to the whole Act, associated Parts and Chapters: Help about changes and effectsClose effects to be announcedBlanket amendment words substituted by S.I. 2011/1043 art. 3 6Commencement Orders yet to be applied to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007: Help about changes and effectsClose changes to be appliedCommencement Orders bringing legislation that affects this Act into force:S.I. 2009/803 art. 1(2) 10 commences (2008 c. 17)S.I. 2010/101 art. 2-5 commences (2008 c. 29)S.I. 2010/862 art. 3 commences (2008 c. 17)S.I. 2010/921 art. 2 commences (2009 c. 8)S.I. 2010/1640 art. 2 commences (2009 c. 8)S.I. 2011/1741 art. 2 commences (2009 c. 11)S.R. 2010/101 art. 2 commences (2010 c. 4 (N.I.))


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law.

 

From your name I had assumed that you were in some way legally trained. It would seem from this particular thread that the initial query from MBeaumont is NOT being addressed and instead, valuable time is having to be taken up by your requests for "authoritive sources".

 

Hopefully, the attached document will give you the assurance you need that my information is correct in that Part 3 ( and with it Schedule 12) of the TCEA 2007 has not yet been implemented:

 

http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN06230

 

From reading this Parliamentry document you will see that it states as follows:

 

The Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007) came into force in 2007, although not all parts of the Act have been implemented.

Edited by tomtubby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law

 

This is another thread which is in danger of being derailed and being turned into a discussion. As you know, I have already created one discussion thread for you as a result of similar activity on another member's thread.

 

Please remember that these threads are for the OP to get help and advice which is relevant and tailored to their questions and are not intended as general discussion threads.

 

If there are points which you wish to discuss, seek clarification on or, indeed, learn about, then please start your own discussion thread in the appropriate forum.

 

I am sure that seasoned members will be happy to respond to discussion threads when they have the time in between helping members with specific and sometimes urgent problems.

 

Many thanks.


If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star

 

1. Single Premium PPI Q&A Read Here

2. Reclaim mis-sold PPI

Read Here

3. Reclaim Loan & Credit Card Charges Read Here

4. The CAG Interest Tutorial

Read Here

5. Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

6. Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

7. Thinking of a Full & Final Settlement?

Read Here

 

How To Upload Documents To Cag

Instructions

 

I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE

 

 

 

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.

 

If you receive a private message which you consider abusive, derogatory or otherwise inappropriate, whether it be about yourself or other members, please report it using the "report" icon

 

If you are approached (or have been approached) by private message with an offer of help "Off Forum" or with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee. Remember, this is for your own protection

my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Schedule 12 active ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lamma,

 

No Schedule 12 has not been enacted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law,

 

For the best part of two days you have been rejecting my explanation regarding Implementation of Part 3 and Schedule 12 of the TCEA 2007.

 

In order to try to clear this matter up once and for all you will see that in my post 55 I provided a link to an official Parlimentray document which states as follows:

 

"This note provides a summary of the problems identified with the current system of regulation of bailiffs. It then provides an outline of the government’s proposed reforms as set out in its consultation paper, ‘Transforming bailiff action’, published on 17 February 2012. Many of the reforms would be achieved by implementing Part 3 and Schedule 12 of the TCEA 2007"

 

"Specifically, the purpose of Part 3 of the Act is to create a new system of ‘taking control of goods’ in order to enforce judgments. Part 3 has yet to be implemented."

 

This government document cannot be clearer. Any yet, despite this you have made ANOTHER post stating that schedule 12 was enacted on 19th July 2007.

 

This is yet again, causing confusion.

Edited by tomtubby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. Portmanteau Acts are never implemented wholesale. And we have never seen a thread about a "Warrant of Control" for the same reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am being to get the impression that TB Law is a law student and is trying to impress with their lack of knowledge by derailing various threads. TB if you are going to help, stick to the subject matter and also take advice from the professionals such as Tomtubby. You will learn a lot from her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than trying to de-rail this thread with your ranting, we should consider the facts.

 

 

Edited by honeybee13
Unauthorised link removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law, with respect, YOU have managed for days to "de-rail" this thread and, so much so, that the orignal poster has disappeared !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had posted the source in my post #63 but someone has deleted it.

 

Search "Taking control of goods under Schedule 12 to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007" and the first listing gives the start date Schedule 12 came into force.

 

but please, no more rants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When searching using your precise words it takes me to a site for Practicallaw. As you will see from my post I have attached an official Parliamentary document which confirms the correct position. Schedule 12 has NOT been enacted and that is the end of the matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When searching using your precise words it takes me to a site for Practicallaw. As you will see from my post I have attached an official Parliamentary document which confirms the correct position. Schedule 12 has NOT been enacted and that is the end of the matter.

Amen!


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on track, no levy, no fees due. see post #19.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TB Law,

 

Whilst you may be a law student, there are those on this site, like myself, who have worked on the front line of law enforcement and seen how the law works in practice. Please let me assure you that it is a lot different to what is printed in a legal text book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A law student that fails to know what the word "expected" means ? Can someone remind me how the ignore feature works here please/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...