Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LloydsTSB –old current account - Harassment?


steve1234567
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Lloyds sent me a letter in July claiming an account was in arrears and demanded payment. I immediately wrote back to them disputing their claim.

 

They have now employed 6 debt collection agencies to deal with this account and each time I have send a CCA and followed up with an Account in Dispute letter and they (DCAs) have not responded again... until now.

 

I sent the last agency the Account in Dispute letter (12+2+30) at the beginning of November and they have replied saying:

 

“ If you read our letter on 22/10 you will see that we returned your fee of £1 advising that the payment needed to be made directly to our client before the request can be actioned. We have not failed to comply with your request as you have not sent in the correct method of payment (cheque or postal order made out to our clients). Please forward this payment to the above address to allow us to process your request with our client.”

 

I sent a £1 postal order made to the DCA. Are the trying it on and is this harassment by lloyds?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Debt Collection.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Next time you receive another threatogram from another DCA (but after seeing off 6 of them, not many DCA's for Lloyds to go to lol) instead of sending another CCA request costing you money, send them the following...http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency

 

The last letter you received is DCA Bull, they have a legal right under s175 of the 1974 Consumer Credit Act to pass this on to their Clients which will be Lloyds, the £1 fee payable to the DCA made by you was correct, basically, they did not like the fact that you knew the law, and as they were only collecting on behalf of so not worth their while arguing.

 

When you say Account in Arrears and sending CCA requests, we talking about A credit card, loan etc. ?

 

If the account is in arrears legally (even though you may dispute it) then Lloyds can legally use DCA's to collect the debt.

 

If you can please supply more information as to why the debt is disputed, people can advise further.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stigman.

 

This is an old current account which was closed (so I thought) and any overdraft added to a loan. I have not heard from the bank for 5/6 years regarding it and not received any statements. Most of the amount claimed (£350) will be made up of fines and interest on fines. Because of their problems I think they are tying up loose ends!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no CCA for a current account that's why you have been ignored steve, current accounts are not a regulated credit facility.

If you want full information you need to send a SAR to the bank.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

overdrafts are regulated, to a certain extent. but, are excluded from part V requirements, and thus not subject to s78 cca request re a copy executed agreement as such due to the exclusion. but, the remainder of s78 (ie a, b, and c) could apply? (plus, there is the determination requirements re an o/d facility letter)

In COUTTS & Co v SEBESTYEN 2005 the judge stated

''It is common ground:

(a) that the agreement for an overdraftlink3.gif of £2,000 in the terms of Coutts' letter dated 5 April 2002 was a regulated debtor-creditor agreement within the meaning of sections 8 and 13© of the Act, providing for 'running-account credit' within the meaning of section 10(1)(a) of the Act (in effect, a revolving credit within the agreed credit limit of £2,000); and

(b) that, as such, it was subject to the requirements of Part V of the Act (including the requirements as to documentation set out in sections 57 to 63 of the Act) save and in so far as it was excluded or exempted from such requirements.''

 

(note in general though that from 2/11 there are new requirements re o/d's since then)

Link to post
Share on other sites

a current account can't be called in as such re collection if no o/d!

anyway, OP does mention an o/d in #4? o/d added to a loan? so, is re a loan?

either way, post #6 of general info re o/d's :)

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a personal loan to clear the Overdraft.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something looks odd here:

1. The OP has dealt with 6 DCAs in 5 months. This is a very fast turn over. Perhaps provoked by the OPs liberal use of CCA requests, but it seems odd nonetheless.

2. If the original account was in dispute, all recovery activity should have ceased.

 

Perhaps Steve should send a written complaint to Lloyds detailing the following:

1. The original amount was disputed on date XX/XX/XXX for reason YYY. This is a written record of that dispute.

2. Despite numerous requests, no agreement or statement of account that complies with the CCA 1974 has been received.

3. The whole account is now in dispute for these reasons.

 

Your advice is appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if one of those requests have been banked and not returned then should be no need to do any further cca requests, it should've been forwarded on to loyds. as it seems to be still with loyds, then yes any payment should've been made out to loyds not the dca. best do a cca request direct to loyds in that case.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...