Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory demand over turned now being threatened with legal action


Archiem
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It is worth checking with your Home Insurers legal expenses, as they may pay for you to use your own solicitor. The only problem with this may be that the dispute goes back to 2007/2008 and they may not see the statutory demand as being new, but a continuation of the problem you had in 2007. With any claim under an Insurance, you have to register the claim within so many days of the problem occurring.

 

Phone them to discuss this and see whether they can help or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

**UPDATE**

 

I spoke to CAB and by the end of that first week I had returned my forms and evidence.

 

I just went through point by point, ie incorrect to say I owed this sum and showed the evidence of copy of cheque

and my bank account for a month to prove it hadn't been cancelled and referred to the evidence marked A, B etc)

 

put those papers together and marked them up, quickly told my story,

went on to say it was incorrect to say there was no dispute and put that evidence together,

and said it was incorrect to charge interest (well CAB said it was, as there had been no Court Order made so they couldn't quote the County Court Act, I took this on trust).

 

In the part that said who do you want to summon, well it was in the plumbers name, but had been signed by Final Demand Limited,

so in order to be fair I summoned them both.

 

I now have a court date of 29th March to hear my setting aside.

 

I did ask the court to hear my application because I believe final demand may well want to withdraw the Statutory demand

when they are aware that I have applied to have it set aside, but I wanted a resolution otherwise I have no protection from a whole string of no win no fee outfits having a go.

 

CAB said lots of people just pay to stop this or pay a small amount,

but the worst thing was the people who ignored it because they knew they owed nothing and then ended up with big problems.

 

The Statutory Demand in promoted on the Government web site as an easy way for a debt to be settled.

Why don't they promote the small claims court instead ?

 

Thanks

Edited by Archiem
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

In March this year I had a Statutory demand overturned, because a) it was an abuse of processes, b) I had a cheque proving payment and a number of other reasons. Also they were claiming statutory interest and costs, but the case has never been to court and no judgement made, so the interest and costs were deemed invalid.

 

The other side were told there only recourse was to a Small Claims Court, which is fine by me as I will counter claim.

 

Now I have been contacted by a company called Credit Protection Services looking for the exact amount that was on the statutory demand (which included interest and costs) saying if I don't pay within 7 days they will issue court proceeding for the recovery which will include a claim for both interest and costs.

 

I have called them and informed them that this has been to court and gave them the court and number of the case.

 

My question is if a statutory Demand is overturned, can the person who issued it just keep going to different agencies and issue another statutory demand in the same. I could be back and forth to my local court every few months

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they could issue another SD on the correct basis and then look to petition for bankrupty. They would have to make a stronger case than they did previously, otherwise you could just point to the previous case. I don't think they will do this and just issue a court claim as advised in their letter.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I don't think they have a stronger claim, the Judge was pretty damming as he was holding a copy of my cheque which quite clearly had left my bank account and gone to his (initially I think he didn't reconcile his books and asked again for the payment as the invoice he presented was marked not paid, he has already seen my proof, but has waited 5 years to do anything).

 

What do they meant by a court claim ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A county Court Summons(Money Judgment CCJ).

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, does this not require proof that there is a debt in the first place ?

 

Yes they would have to show you had breached a contract condition i.e not paying the amount due within the period required.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to state the obvious, but you will need to mount a defence to bring this to the court's attention. Judgment by default would be a travesty in your case.

 

You are dealing with a DCA here. Average IQ is about 50.... Therefore I would start by disputing the account because you paid all monies that were legally due at court. Tell them to stop recovery activity and remove all details they hold on you under the Data Protection Act.

 

Take it to them...

Link to post
Share on other sites

.............

The other side were told there only recourse was to a Small Claims Court, which is fine by me as I will counter claim.

 

Now I have been contacted by a company called Credit Protection Services looking for the exact amount that was on the statutory demand (which included interest and costs) saying if I don't pay within 7 days they will issue court proceeding for the recovery which will include a claim for both interest and costs.

 

..........

 

did they actually say 'will'? if so, be prepared they might well issue a claim (not an sd).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...