Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory demand over turned now being threatened with legal action


Archiem
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I saw a thread referring to these people, but it was last year.

 

I had work done on my house in 2007, to install a new boiler and new radiators and some plumbing jobs. I made two payments to the guy, he took 8 months and left with no corgi cert, which I had to get via corgi, ruined three ceilings, had several leaks since, the central heating zones don't work, etc.

 

I heard from him in March 2008 when he sent an invoice for an amount I had already paid. I called he said I can do what I like when I like go jump. Then I didn't hear from him again. I thought he had realised his mistake and was to rude to apologise. The other scenario would be he would take me to Court, but I have the cheque I paid and I could counter-claim for damages.

 

Two years and seven months later I get a letter from these Commercial & Domestic Investigations, saying that I owned him the money. I called and advised it was paid, and asked them to send a copy of all invoices and payments on my account. At the same time I called the plumber and left him a message asking the same thing.

 

I haven't received anything from the plumber, but the Investigations people have send a copy of the invoice he sent in March 2008. I have asked my bank for a copy of the cheque and don't know what else can do.

 

Any thoughts, please

Link to post
Share on other sites

The onus is on them to prove you still owe money.

Keep everything in writing.

If you can get a copy of the cheque it should prove things-although you will also need to reconcile it against a bank statement to show that it was actually paid.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't know what anyone else would advise but, providing that you have:

Proof of Payment; Proof he did not have relevant qualifications and Proof of job being completed by Plumber - Along with any evidence of damage or repairs needed - Then my advice would be the County Court - Small Claims. Calculate how much he has cost you to date. Google in your local court and follow instructions. Take any form and evidence to your local CAB.

 

We have been counterclaimants against a fabricated bill - by a builder who is now bust and disqualified. We won, but will never see money. Thing is, even as counterclaimant, the court will refer to you as 'defendant.' You will always be on a back footing. He sued us without producing ANY evidence at all - but if we had failed to produce any evidence by any given date (there were several) then he would have won - by default! Better to get in first.

 

Also report him to Trading Standards - regarding his lack of Corgi and bad workmanship. They might just have other complaints about this man and yours can add to, or start a file!

 

Inform the Bailiffs that the sum is not owed and their client has been reported to Trading Standards. The fact that the matter is being disputed should be enough to stand them down, until the dispute is sorted one way or another. Again CAB or Trading Standards will have all the Templates you might need for any letters you want to send (Not forgetting this site, of course).

 

N.B. Although he was proven a liar eventually - he still put us through a year of hell... And it cost us around £500 to defend and counterclaim (although we were awarded charges, he declared liquidation so never paid either costs or the £5000 we were awarded!!!

 

Sorry, for some reason, the font here is much too small for me to see what I am typing, so I have had to keep this short. Hope it still makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have now proved to these people that I have paid this sum of money, and asked them to take my details off of their systems, they say that their "client" has not responded and will remove my details only when they here from theeir "client" that there is an agreement that I have paid.

 

This is madness they should be sure that the debt is actually owed before they take the "case" on.

 

What should I do now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Somebody rang my bell this evening, my son opened the door and a man ask for me. He said not here, who are you. The man went to his car and came back with a plastic wallet with some papers and said legal documents. Where is she, he told him to go away.

 

I don't have a clue what this is, I haven't received any letters through the post. I'm haven't been out for a few weeks because I am sick. I'm now too scared to go out. What do I do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have an unpaid debt exceeding £750, it could be statutory demand, which is a threat to make you bankrupt. They try to serve these by hand on a couple of occasions and if unsuccessful they will post them.

 

Wait to see what arrives and then post back.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply, I don't as far as a know owe anybody, as I thought if I did they would write to me first ? I'm not going to answer the door, if something arrives by post I can deal with that, I'm just horrified at the thought of a stranger trying to grab me in the street. I thought it strange that he didn't leave a card, but he had refused to identify himself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest that you check your credit record to see if anything is on there.

 

Are you going through any other situations i.e separation from a partner ?

 

Are you claiming any state benefits or via benefits your local authority, that could be brought into question ?

 

Are you a director of a company, where a problem could have arisen ?

 

If it is not related to a personal debt, someone is trying to contact you to serve papers to bring proceeding of some sort. Or a mistake has been made by a company trying to search for someone else that shares the same name. Or you have won a competition and someone is trying to deliver your prize cheque.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, don't fall into any of the above categories. I'm hoping it is a mistake. Unfortunately, I never go into competitions, so no cheque coming my way (if only). Cheered me up though thinking like that ! thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

cra file

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, don't fall into any of the above categories. I'm hoping it is a mistake. Unfortunately, I never go into competitions, so no cheque coming my way (if only). Cheered me up though thinking like that ! thanks

 

Perhaps someone else entered for you !

 

The only other thoughts I had were TV licence, something related to the address (dispute with neighbour or council) or a car accident you were involved in ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be a DCA or bailiff who has done a trace on someone with a similar or same name , and you are in the frame for it, not as uncommon as people think., or for a previous occupant.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All they need to do is touch you with it and drop it on the floor, they will keep coming back, if you havent done anything wrong then you need to know what it is have it off them when they come again

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found out what this about, it is a Statutory Demand from a plumber I used in 2007.

 

I spoke on the phone to the process server and said that I didn't owe any money, he was very kind and told me not to worry,

he will deliver the paper to me on Friday and put them in an envelope and post it through more door.

He said that he gets no details of the case but advised me to make an appointment with CAB and gather me evidence together and they will sort it out.

 

I paid this man two sums in 2007 which came to nearly five thousand pounds.

The work he did was poor, he ruined three newly plastered ceilings by cutting off pipes and not capping them (the later having to back and reconnect them),

filling radiators without putting an end value on etc.

and finally never came back to check the gas work and issue a Certificate,

despite numerous request in the end I had to go the Corgi who sent and inspector to do the cheques and made him issue a Certificate.

 

In March 2008 he sent an invoice for the exact sum I had paid him the previous March (an invoice was promised but never materialised),

I informed him tht the date of the invoice was wrong and that I had paid.

 

Didn't hear anything further until October 2010 when I was contacted by Commercial and Domestic Investigations.

They sent this March 2008 invoice and said their "client" had authorised them to collect this amount.

I sent them a copy of the cheque for the same amount with evidence it had passed my bank and gone into his,

I also gave the numbers of the other cheque and the date it had cleared my account.

 

I didn't hear anything from them so I kept phoning to see what was happening,

they said they had passed the evidence to their client and hadn't heard anything back.

 

After three-four months I give up as I just got the same reply and they wouldn't say how long they gave their client to reply before they realised he wasn't going to.

 

So now its 2012 and here I am again,

until I get the paper work I don't know if its the same invoice or if he has now made up another fictions invoice for another amount.

 

All I know is if he had a valid c laim he would have gone to a Small Claims Court,

but as I could have counter claimed he probably though that was such a good idea.

 

Also somebody suggested using my legal insurance through my house policy instead of the CAB I don't know which is best

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...