Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bayliffs have been today and posted a seizure of goods notice through the door listing two cars. As it says this is an 'agreement' how can it be as it has not been signed by me? can they still take the goods?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what for?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The levy is not valid because its made in your absence and the document has 7 items or less. The Judgment in Ambrose vs. Nottingham City Council ruled that "global levies" are irregular and therefore, not binding on debtors regardless of whether or not a Walking Possession Agreement has been signed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The levy is not valid because its made in your absence and the document has 7 items or less. The Judgment in Ambrose vs. Nottingham City Council ruled that "global levies" are irregular and therefore, not binding on debtors regardless of whether or not a Walking Possession Agreement has been signed.

 

Rubbish, you need tolook closer at that Judgment and research more on how levies are done.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

im summising it will be a NOTICE OF DISTRESS listing the cars,

where they on your drive??

 

the relevent legislation is community charges (administration and enforcement) 1989 no. 438 and the council tax (administration and enforcement) regulations 1992 no.513 i belive

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts relating to the discussion have been moved to this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?371964-Bailiff-Levy-Seizure-when-debtor-not-present-Discussion

 

Please use this one to help the OP rather than carry on the debate which is now in the discussion thread

 

Thank you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Betty Jay lets see if we can help you with this....a few more questions I'm afraid....do the cars on the notice of seizure actually belong to the named debtor? what amount do the bailiff allege to be owed? have you contacted the Council to check the figures the bailiff are asking are true to the debt?

what charges (should be on the back of the notice) do they dream to be owed to them?

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the cars on the levy do not belong to the debtor than as wonkeydonkey has said the levy is invalid, if the bailiffs are intransigent and the council support them, remind them of the LGO and the scathing report about Blaby Council and Rossendales.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...