Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NRAM Claim Started


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4147 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First off, hello all!

 

I've decided to join in on the forum to let you know how I get on with a PPI complaint against Northern Rock (£7k personal loan).

 

I borrowed £7k over 36 months in Jan 2008 via a telephone application. Sales guy at NR told me he had run everything through the computer and it was recommending I took out "Gold cover" (sic) and that the success of my application sort of depended on it.

 

I never thought any more about it and paid off the loan early (Feb 2010). It was only when I was looking at my credit report online that I remembered it!

 

After my initial claim form ended up with Bradford & Bingley (who dismissed it), I managed to get hold of NRAM again today only for the assistant's PC to crash after 15 minutes of me providing details. :-x

 

Next person I got passed to basically told me to sod off as I had no paperwork and call Cardif Pinnacle and ask them if I had PPI. She claimed it would show as a separate payment on my bank statements (which it didn't)

 

Called Pinnacle and managed to confirm I did indeed have PPI and they supplied me with a policy number which was the loan reference too apparently. So back to NRAM and after 1 dropped call and 1 non-answered call (:-x:-x), I got through and have now started a claim. Strange that they cannot simply do the same search that Pinnacle did!

 

Anyone estimate what the interest rate would have been on a personal loan back in 2008? (Trying to work out how much the PPI portion of the loan was!!)

 

Anyway, I'll keep this thread updated with how I get on...

 

I did submit a complaint to HSBC a year or so back regarding their PPI on a credit card but they dismissed my claim as I had signed a box on the paperwork to accept the Ts & Cs of the insurance and I never got around to taking it further... :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ideally you should SAR each lender to get hold of all the data they hold on you. There is a template in the CAG library (top left in green).

 

Add a line to the effect that the SAR is to include copies of all and any agreements you have ever had with them.

 

Without the loan agreements you may not find out how much the PPI premium was and therefore will be unable to check any offer that they may make to you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From post #1

 

She claimed it would show as a separate payment on my bank statements (which it didn't)

 

If you weren't making a separate payment to an insurer then this points to it being a single premium added to the loan.

 

Called Pinnacle and managed to confirm I did indeed have PPI and they supplied me with a policy number which was the loan reference too apparently

 

This also points to a premium being added to the loan

 

From Post #3

 

That's a good idea but NRAM claim that they do not hold details of PPI (which is why they made me call Pinnacle)

 

They will say anything on the phone to fob you off.

 

 

The only way to find out the amount of this PPI is to get a copy of the agreement or the figures from it, hence a SAR request to get ALL data that the lender holds on you. You will, I feel, be bashing your head against a brick wall if you try to get details out of them on the phone (although I would be happy to be proved wrong on this).

 

If it were me I would SAR them and don't forget to add the line about copies of agreements.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

As promised, I am updating my claim for PPI miss-selling on a Northern Rock loan.

 

Last week I decided to call NRAM to see if my complaint was being dealt with. This was an absolute nightmare - called the number provided on their correspondence only to be told I needed to call a different number (their Leeds office). Called that and was told that because I had no "T reference number" I had to go back to the original office. I got passed around like that 3 times before finally getting someone to help.

 

Anyway, I received a letter today saying that it seems I was wrongly sold PPI on TWO loans from Northern Rock. I had forgotten the first one but they confirmed as they had my previous, previous address.

 

The amount offered in the letter is £2149.14 which is about 4 times the amount I had hoped for/expected. The fact they dealt with the complaint within 8 weeks was a shock too.

 

BUT...

 

I really don't want to sound greedy here but there is a part on the "Calculation summary sheet" which is confusing me..

 

It starts of with "Refund of premiums paid" - £2558.49

Plus "8% simple interest" - £1254.59

Giving "Total refund" - £3813.08

 

But it then has "Minus: Paid PPI claims" - £1043.66

and "8% simple interest" - £620.28

"Total deduction" - £1663.94

 

Hence the £2149.14 settlement figure.

 

So does anyone know what the "Paid PPI claims" refers to?

 

I have not previously raised any complaint over the PPI with Northern Rock nor have I ever claimed on the actual insurance.

 

What I did do is repay the loan early - could this be what they are referring to??

 

I will call them on Monday but wondered if anyone had any thoughts.

 

Thanks,

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...