Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • see post #425 above: I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale ...   could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?  
    • Hi, no problem at all. It's a Vauxhall Grandland X and I can confirm that the service history is not stored in the vehicles computers or online. The vehicle is financed through Black Horse on a PCP. Thanks, Steve
    • Thank you so much for all the information you all have provided! I really appreciate it.  dx I will definitely speak to the TFL prosecutor before the hearing if I can find them to beg for an OCC.    Just to update. At the start of this journey I reached out to many organisations and advice centres but no one responded. However, a few days ago I received an email back from We Are Advocate, that a barrister has volunteered to help me with my case. He said it is his job to get the best possible outcome for me. He suggested I get some character references, which I have done and will be receiving over the course of the next few days.  He also told me: Unfortunately, you WILL be left with a criminal record if you are convicted! You do not stand convicted of the offence  YET. You can only be convicted if a) you plead guilty AT COURT or b) you are FOUND guilty after a trial in open court. So that answers one of our questions.    I have asked him lots of other questions and I'm just waiting for him to reply.  So glad I will not be facing the court alone.    TD
    • Thanks guys - I've written to P2G as attached, included a copy of my letter to them from yesterday, and have also emailed them copies of both. 18Apr24 Updated Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
    • Other entity? Does another creditor have security on the property?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI reclaim used to offset existing debts - HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not been on for a while so hi to everyone :)

 

Can someone advise me as to what happens when lloyds pay ppi towards an outstanding debt instead of us?

 

The reason for asking is due to the fact that when my wife was forced into I'll health retirement by the dwp

she worked for for 10 years we both had legitimate claims under the policy so we thought.

 

What lloyds did was not only ignore the claim for my wife who is disabled

they refunded the ppi and paid it onto the outstanding loan

and then sent a demand for payment of the outstanding balance.

 

In my case when I tried to claim as i became a full time carer for my wife.

 

The time when we needed there help they did exactly the same as above on my credit card offering no explanation or reason why.

 

The balances are still outstanding

we had 6 different policies in place including the mortgage

all of which never paid out and offered no response.

 

The mortgage company even sent out a private investigator but that's another story :)

 

I am not sure what to do as they have all contributed to screwing up our credit file not something that bothers me anymore.

 

The one positive though is we don't borrow money and it's not likely we ever will again unless God decides to,open a bank.

 

Do I get back in the saddle again to do battle or carry on sitting quietly smiling in the shadows?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a breakdown of the PPI refunds?

 

the portion which is the 8% stat court s69 interest

should always goto you not be used for offset.

 

have any of these debts been sold to a DCA?

 

tell us more please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a breakdown of the PPI refunds?

 

the portion which is the 8% stat court s69 interest

should always goto you not be used for offset.

 

have any of these debts been sold to a DCA?

 

tell us more please

 

dx

 

They have sold 1 to lowell's and westcott

and red are chasing another one

 

all of which have been in dispute over the years with lloyds and the Fsa.

 

The product sold to lowell's has not had the ppi repaid at all yet.

 

The reason so far for not claiming it is lloyds could not provide an original signed copy of the agreement on request a couple of years ago.

 

We didn't respond or claim due to us not recognising the original debt so being reasonable you can't have it both ways can you.

 

Now they have tried pulling a swifty with selling a disputed debt to lowell's

I may take a different view on it but that means notifying lowell's enclosing copies of the original letters sent to lloyds.

 

I am not sure about dealing with lowells as they all bore me with the generic patter and scripts they work from.

 

It makes very little difference to me and just goes back and forth in a tit for tat so I would like some views and opinions so I can make a decision on what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have received the 8% in the past on some products but the ppi charges some of which were over £6k were paid onto the debts that should never have been debts in the first place. The other one I am now looking at is clean and paid up in full which is due back in full which is another £5k plus interest I am looking at that now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you you saying they have or are offsetting ppi against SOLD debts?

 

if so they cannot do that

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt lowells have purchased has never had a ppi reclaim yet as we don't recognise the debt.

 

The other agreements are still with Lloyds and the ppi has been paid against the outstanding debts which would never have been there had they even recognised a claim.

 

When a claim was originally pursued we were fobbed off and left to claim against a third party insurer we had never heard of before?

 

All the literature provided was lloyds for the insurance.

 

Under the policy we had a legitimate claim on the policy following my wifes retirement to settle the whole debt thats why they did not want to pay out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mickey.. any debt they have sold off, they should repay the PPI to you.

 

However, this will still leave the 3rd party chasing you for the debt :(

 

Are there any default charges applied to the debts as well ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure there are more than a few default charges I will have to check.

 

The loan has not had any ppi paid back as yet due to us not recognising the debt or putting in a claim for a refund to date.

 

I will have to dig out the old files and dust them off for a recap.

 

If I was a single guy I would have joined the freemans by now lol.

 

Why would anyone pay a dca company in which a legal contract has never been entered into?

 

Do banks initial signed agreements state that they are allowed to sell a debt if you default as part of there own terms and conditions?

 

At what point in time does this end that may help in the decision making in dealing with it all again and finalising things?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A ppi reclaim should put you back in the position you would have been in had the ppi not been applied to the account in the first place.

 

So you would get the premiums back plus any associated interest the bank charged on the account.

 

The 8% part of the award works differently depending on whether it is a credit card or a loan.

 

If the debts have been sold on then there is no right of set-off and the refund should come to you. You then have the situation where you would need to sort out any debt which has been purchased by a debt purchaser.

 

If the original creditor still owns the account then they may well use their right of set-off to put the PPI refund to any account which has indebtedness.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked on the original file

 

the info I requested from lloyds included two payments made onto the account logged as ccd rebate does anyone know what these are?

 

Then according to the screen prints

 

i requested from Lloyds there was a write off to clear the debt in early 2009?

 

Not being familiar with their internal procedures

 

I am not sure why this is recorded as such and then selling the debt this year nearly 4 years later.

 

I have just downloaded the Lloyds ppi claim pack has anyone used this?

 

The reason for asking as it looks like it is designed and written to trip you up I could be wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would use the FOS CQ

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

sri explain further please...

 

once a debt has fallen off your cra file

 

it cannot comeback

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell's who purchased the debt from lloyds have recorded a debt this year on my wife's credit file.

 

The original loan with lloyds was June 2006 and the last payment July 2008 when my wife lost her income with no warning from work.

 

Should that be on her credit report and if so for how long?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a debt has already fallen off because 6yrs default

it should not comeback

 

if you are saying the SAME DEBT shown TWICE on your cra file

 

then thats WRONG.

 

an account on a CRA will only fall off when:

6yrs from default passes

6yrs from settlement.

the creditor removes it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...