Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • should I?  - I figured maybe back log.  I will give them a call then - it's almost 4 months tbf
    • Do you have historical meter readings from before the meters were changed? And more recent history showing consumption, in metered units not in £s,  since the change. One specific thing to check is gas. Check that the meter and the bill use the same units. If the meter is recording cu.m but they're billing as if it was counting 100 cu.ft, then your bill will be nearly three times too high.  Overall I'm guessing it's an Ovo screw up. It's significant that they didn't block the transfer, maybe they aren't so sure of their position.
    • Hmmm, interesting point. In my career, that I am retired from now, there were an immense amount of rules and regulations that one had to adhere to by law. The qualification process is rigorous with on going assessments throughout your career and re-certification every 12 months. If you were shown to be not competent in those rules and regulations you could not hold the position and the operational consequences of that could potentially be dire. In the same respect, perhaps a judge who is not conversant in the rules of POFA should not sit in on cases that requires proficiency in that area? I also bow to your considerable knowledge in this area, perhaps I shouldn't be commenting but by doing so I find it helps the learning process. Your last point has just reminded me of something that may help my case, thank you.
    • Just had an email re the my breache in agreement by her rep.   I asked you yesterday if they had asked about her name in the thread being removed.   The issue they have is the Elizabeth turner and genetic pups entry on google.   they knew I did not put it up and told them so in court.  I dnt know how to post on google.   I told them I cannot remove what I did not post.  when i come back here and saw her name gone from threads title, I presumed her reps sought it.   now I get an email saying her names still on google ur breaching the agreement as it’s still on google.  
    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI over 6 years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi I have been giving myself a headache trawling through all the these threads looking for the right spread sheet and right templates.

 

I have already sent the SAR to cap1

and received the reply docs with the statement,

 

The problem I have is that they only sent statements going back to 2005

yet the card was opened in 2000,

 

now since it has been ruled that ppi is unlawful how do I go about claiming from 2000.

 

I did read somewhere that I should sort out the SAR documents before starting the actual claim or I could be left with a new claim.

is there as template letter to request for older statements

 

out of curiosity

 

can I take the monthly ppi £2.02 charged in 2005 and apply it to each month going back to 2000,

in indicating in the reclaim letter that "due to your failure to provide all the information on ppi payments dating back to the date the account was opened

I have applied the amount of £2.02 obtained from the earliest statement you have on record."

the wording could do with some work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

use an average of ALL your known PPI payment.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

sheet 2 if you are prepared to goto court in restitution

 

sheet 4 via FOS route.

 

there are several CaP1 successes

 

look in the successes thread

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I have sent in a claim for missold ppi to Capital One , dating back to 2002.

 

I filled in the spreadsheet FosCISheet. using 29% apr the amount totalled £1818.18.

 

Last week I received a letter offering me a settlement of £557.32 of which the 8% added will be taxed at 20% deducting 17.13.

 

is there a letter (sample ) I could use to deal with their reply.

 

I have about 6 days to reply to this letter before they consider it settled.

 

below is the part of their letter which contains the important bits

 

Dear sir/madam

Thank youfor your correspondence bla bla bla

 

Our investigation

I am sorryyou have had cause to complain – bla bla bla

 

The outcome

As a resultof my investigation I am upholding your complaint.

 

I have decided to refund thefull amount of PPI premiums and associated interest charged to your account.

 

The total redress payment is £557.32,

which is the total of £265.92 inpremiums,

associated interest of 222.84

and a further 8% interest of £85.69.

 

Wehave deducted basic rate income tax of 20% on the 8% interest element,

whichequated to £17.13, as we are obliged to do by HMRC.

 

If youraccount is in arrears or over its credit limit, any refund will be set offagainst the arrears or over limit amount to bring your account up to date.

 

The remainder if any will be sent to you by way of cheque.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post up your xls

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the account still active or is it closed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and never been in credit?>

int still being charged?

sound unlike cap1 to try it on with the recent successes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems very strange

 

ok time to pull them up then.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the other half of the letter (page 2) it says that if I accept the offer then fill in the attached form and send back within 14 days. since the 14 days have passed, can I assume that I can send them another letter I have found one on the internet please let me know if it should be changed in any way before sending.

Thanks

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

AC/ No 1234567890

 

On 07-05 2013 I sent you a letter regarding the PPI policy I was sold by you, Capital One in conjunction with my application for a credit card.

I have since received your reply and note that you have offered me £557.32 as settlement.

I do not believe that this amount is sufficient to cover a refund of all premiums and subsequent interest on the payments that I have made towards this policy plus an addition of the 8% statutory interest to which I believe I would be awarded by a court. However, if you were to increase the settlement amount to £ 1818.18 that of which was originally claimed for in letter dated 04 April 2013 I would be willing to accept the offer and to close this matter.

If I do not receive a response from you within the next 14 days confirming that you are willing to increase your offer as requested I will be taking my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman.

Yours faithfully

 

_______________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ombudsman as has been reported non helpful in most cases and can take a year or more to comply with any final answer, which is usually the same agreement with Cap 1, they seem it seems to be going court route as they had a success it has been reported and chancing that will send people off the scene?

 

So unless you are serious about taking them to court, then plan ahead seriously which way to go

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the court rout would be best as I have seen most people get as far as filing the papers with the court, at this point Cap1 tend to pay up. I just need to get the wording right so as not to further delay it by miswording the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...