Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This may be long but would be greatful of any help. Last Tuesday came out of my house to find my car gone it was parked on the road. Called the police to report it and was told Newlyn bailiffs had taken it and advised to call them. When I called them I was told that Southwark council had authorized them to seize the car due to an unpaid pcn. The ticket was issued on 23/2/12 the day I gave birth to my son !!!! Had stopped on school lines due to contractions (a friend was driving). Newlyn wanted £865.84 to release my car. Never received the notices as moved out of property the car was registered to on 14/2/12 and had been put into emergency acomodation by Southwark council.So had nowhere to forward post. Had no letters notices nothing until car was gone knew nothing about it.Even when Newlyn took my car there was no letter or anything to say they had taken it. The warrent was issued to the old address but Newlyn amazingly found where I live now but couldn't give me any notice. Have filed a TE7 and TE9 the next day but am concerned as have heard that sometimes it is the baliffs that can refuse this. Have had tickets before and paid them have also had one since and paid it. Any advice would be appreciated just don't know where to turn. Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the bailiffs have acted illegally. I thought they first must clamp the car or warn the owner that the car is going to be removed. Surely that have a duty to try and locate the owner before removing it?

 

I think you need to speak to the council first although if a warrant has been issued then you would need to apply here http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/northampton-bulk-centre/traffic-enforcement-centre to get it suspended or set aside.

Edited by sailor sam

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought was given no warning at all. Not even a chance to take personal belongings out of the car! Have spoken to the council and the bailiffs and they are both saying that it is in the others hands. Neither will release the car until the outcome of the TE7/TE9 which I have found out is up to the council/bailiffs that took my car so not holding out too much hope they are both working together. All they seem to want is money. Had advice from citizens advice and they said about trying to get it set aside. Went to the county court to file the papers but they weren't sure what forms to fill in and gave me an injunction form not sure if this is right? Am also not sure when any of the warrants were issued as have no paperwork so think I am out of time to do much. Can I ask the bailiffs/council for copies of any letters they have sent. Have no idea how much the ticket was in the first place? How much the council now wants? or how much the bailiffs are charging? all I know is the huge sum the bailiffs now want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks new to this so wasn't sure where to post. Have filed TE7 and TE9 both council and bailiffs have copies of this neither will release my car. The council have said that when a ticket is issued all paperwork is sent to the address that is on the car registration the day of the offence and at no time check if you have moved and are actually receiving the notices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok have already done that I think through the T7 T9 it just sucks that there is nothing else I can do and that councils and bailiffs are getting away with what is basically legalized theft. As both of them could have got in contact with me at anytime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have filed the Out of Time Application any there is now a LONG waiting time.

 

How old is your car and roughly, how much is it worth?

 

Is there any finance?

 

Have you updated you records at DVLA an if so, when was this?

 

Once again, it would seem that NEWLYN have chosen to IGNORE CPR 75.7(7). This is simply a disgrace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the LA should ask for the warrant to be re-issued to the new address, and not data cleanse and use the old one

 

CPR 75, 7 (7)

(7) Where the address of the respondent has changed since the issue of the warrant, the authority may request the reissue of the warrant by filing a request –

http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part75

 

 

Newlyn need reporting to OFT under Credit Fitness also as it will affect other aspects of their business.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you sailorsam will take a look at that

 

Hi tomtubby my car is only a little seat ibiza 2005 so not sure how much it is worth but to me worth a lot am really struggling without it. My mum bought it for me about two years ago for about £3000 as she has recently had a double hip replacement and it would mean I could get over to help her which is about an hour drive. Am now unable to go as by public transport it would take at least 3 hours and with two little kids impossible. Unfortunately she bought it right out. Updated my dvla records as soon as I got a permanent address which was over two months ago have bought road tax recently. The council have told me that they don't check address they only go by the address on the registration the day of the offence.

 

Hi brassnecked how would I go about reporting Newlyn to OFT as I can't believe they are allowed to do this kind of thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think bailiffs act quite quickly. I had an unpaid pcn a few years ago and unbeknown to be, they came out the night before and stuck a notice on the windscreen when it was parked on the drive, which being in the house I didn't see, then the following morning because I hadn't got in touch with them they came again (another fee) and put a clamp on it.

Edited by KVF
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tizmefee

 

I hope that nobody minds but I have sent you a private message.

 

I don't mind TT, best you give some info via PM, in some circumstances

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP. when your TE7/9's are done compare the value of your car against the original PCN, you might have a claim for excessive levy by bringing a claim under Steel Linings Limited, Mark Harvey v Bibby & Co [1993] EWCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 Hen 3 (Statute of Marlborough) (1267) c 4 (which enacts that distress is to be reasonable and not too great and that he that takes great and unreasonable distress is to be grievously amerced for the excess of such distresses);

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...