Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private parking fine + Car Hire company Admin Fees


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4187 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

A group of us (4 of us) recently hired a car, there where 3 named drivers on the car, although the contract in this case was in my name.

 

We drove to another part of the country and received a parking fine from a Private Parking company, the photos taking show the car entering the premises and exiting, they do not show the drivers face. In this particular case we did not use any of the parking spaces instead we where by the gates of one of the companies which is in the complex whilst we unloaded and loaded some equipment, and we where instructed to park where we did by the business we where unloading and loading too. Further more the actual loading bay was blocked by another vehicle, i wont say what type of vehicle as it would give away too much information, but suffice to say it was one that would not move for prolonged periods of time (days).

 

So with regard to the "invoice" where do i stand given that this was a hire car, which is in my name rather than a normal vehicle. Do the same rules apply as with a normal vehicle.

 

 

The Invoice was issued prior to the 1st of October, however i will change all the dates by the same amountn the next part in an attempt to obfuscate the particulars.

 

 

The contract with the car hire company states that i will pay on demand "A reasonable administration fee for processing any fines or offenses against the Vehicles, you or us during the rental."

 

The phone message for the Violations Department of said company further states that the fee is for "processing the fee in a timely and efficient manner".

 

The fine was issues on say the 8th of September, and the fine issued 5 days later on the 13th. it was then received no later than 5 days later on the 18th of September, i know this as the letter is stamped as such. It was exactly 20 days after they received it that a copy of the original invoice and a cover letter stating i would be charged an admin fee in the region of £35.

I then received the letter the evening prior to the 2nd deadline date for payment (i.e. i had missed the window for the reduced amount). I phoned up the car hire company phoneline in the morning to find out what was going on and found at that despite the fact the invoice was received on the 18th it was sat in an in tray for a further 10 days before being processed, it then took 6 days to process the letter and then sat for a further 4 days before being posted. (why they actually told me this i do not know).

 

Now i have been assured of the following things, The invoice will be issued to me directory (i am waiting on that now), and that the 14 day period for the reduced amount will start from the date they re-issue the invoice.

 

I have also been assured that under the following 2 sets of circumstances i will be refunded the admin fee (yes they have already taken it off my card before i could block the payment)

1) When the fine is re-issued it is re-issued without the reduced rate (they would also refund the difference between the reduced rate and the higher amount).

2) The invoice is revoked by the issuing parking company.

 

This strikes me here as i am basically being presumed "guilty" / liable for the Invoice the parking company has issued me by the car hire company before the issuing parking company has proven anything. It also strikes me as an unreasonable charge of £35 to take a total of 20 days to forward me a letter and also cause me the extra stress of thinking "oh crap i have to pay the fine tomorrow, i wont be able to appeal".

 

So my 2nd question is where do i stand with regard to the admin charge with the car hire company and is it worth fighting that battle or focusing on getting the parking company to drop it and waiting until they do (if they do) to get my £35 back from the car hire company. I would rather (if i have any hope) get my £35 now, even if it means i later have to pay it out of pure principle given the time its taken them to process the invoice and the cheek of presuming i am liable for the parking invoice.

 

 

Thanks for any advice you may be able to give in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 It is not a FINE and never was!

2 The hire company have no right or agreement to process INVOICES on your behalf (which is what it really is)

3 As they should never have paid or processed the INVOICE, it follows they cannot charge an ADMIN fee.

 

4 DEMAND a refund FROM THE CAR HIRE Co of the entire amount paid and charged to your card or proceed with a county court claim using MCOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank-you for the info you two, Though i would like to clarify at this point all they have done is forward me the invoice + charge me an admin fee, the invoice will be re-issued against me. Does that count as them processing it on my behalf as stated by the original replier? Please forgive the lack knowledge of the exact terminologically, but i'd rather get it correct than say something incorrect and hamper my efforts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you use a credit card ? if so report it as a fraudulent transaction, which it is as it falls outside the contractual obligations as it is an invoice, not a fine, only a court can fine

Expert on Parking matters, Banned by MSE ! along with other parking experts on orders of the BPA !

here to SAVE you money !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...