Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

On ESA WRAG - Wondering about self employment


deathbycrayons
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been on ESA since January after being migrated from IB. I have M.E. and mental health issues. Working for an employer isn't an option for me. I've been self employed before when I was younger and know what it entails. I make cards and jewellery and am considering becoming self employed again, even though I know I won't make very much money. What I need to know is:

 

When I come off ESA, will I be eligible to have my earnings be topped up with income support? What will happen to tax credits?

 

I have a son who is disabled, and he gets DLA middle rate care, and my husband gets carers allowance for him. Will this be affected? Also child tax credits, how will these be affected?

 

I am receiving DLA lower care and lower mobility, I understand these won't be affected.

 

We rent our house and receive housing benefit - will be still be able to claim housing benefit if I am self employed? Do we need to register the business and if so I wonder if this will affect our tenancy (private).

 

Thanks in advance :)

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to claim income support, (your husbands' carers allowance would be grounds for claim) you have to work under 24 hours a week and earn under a certain amount per week. Carer allowance is counted as income. The 24 hours apply if the claim is in your husbands name.

 

Your husbands carers allowance won't be affected. Unless he went into business with you and earnt more than £100 a week.

 

Child tax credits (you might be able to claim working tax credits too) and housing benefits are based on your income. If you claim working tax credits, they'll be too high to claim income support too. As someone receiving DLA, you only need to work 16 hours a week and can claim the disability premium of working tax credits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can commence self employment under the permitted work scheme (as long as the work you do isn't something that the descriptors you scored on says you can't do).

 

Here is a factsheet:

 

http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/f35.htm

 

as long as you are within the permitted work scheme, any income is disregarded for other benefits.

 

Once you are working and earning enough to come off the permitted work scheme you should be able to claim working tax credits.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :) I've just read through our tenancy agreement and it says that we're not to use the premises for any trading or business whatsoever - but I wouldn't actually trading from the property, I'd be selling my wares in local shops. So I'm not sure where this leaves me..

If I have been helpful in any way, please tip my scales :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been on ESA since January after being migrated from IB. I have M.E. and mental health issues. Working for an employer isn't an option for me. I've been self employed before when I was younger and know what it entails. I make cards and jewellery and am considering becoming self employed again, even though I know I won't make very much money. What I need to know is:

 

When I come off ESA, will I be eligible to have my earnings be topped up with income support? What will happen to tax credits?

 

I have a son who is disabled, and he gets DLA middle rate care, and my husband gets carers allowance for him. Will this be affected? Also child tax credits, how will these be affected?

 

I am receiving DLA lower care and lower mobility, I understand these won't be affected.

 

We rent our house and receive housing benefit - will be still be able to claim housing benefit if I am self employed? Do we need to register the business and if so I wonder if this will affect our tenancy (private).

Thanks in advance :)

 

Personally I can't help with the rest but these points..yes you can claim housing benefit when self employed, you need to have an estimate of what your profits will be when you first claim.

Yes you need to register self employed. You can do it all online on the HMRC website.

I rent from housing association, doing similar to what you want to do, & it doesn't affect your tenancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to register your business with HMRC. Not sure anout the tenancy issue, if you're not seeing clients or selling in your house I don't see it makes a difference. My husband is self employed and works at home on the computer all day - we haven't told the landlord, and quite frankly, as long as they get their rent each month, they don't care about much - haven't even inspected the property in three years.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to register your business with HMRC. Not sure anout the tenancy issue, if you're not seeing clients or selling in your house I don't see it makes a difference. My husband is self employed and works at home on the computer all day - we haven't told the landlord, and quite frankly, as long as they get their rent each month, they don't care about much - haven't even inspected the property in three years.

 

I rented a house like that, they were even paying a letting agent to over see it, but they never once visited!

Pretty sure if you're only using one room in your home for business, it's all hunky dorey. Another lady I know that uses more than one room did need a visit from the council for some reason. But should be fine for one room.

My housing association even started running self employed classes at the begining of the year, how to register, sort your tax returns etc, no idea why. I nearly went along but didn't bother in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I have read a number of cases where people with disabilities have done this and HMRC review their working tax credit entitlement if their profits show that they are not earning at least the minimum wage. They are not supposed to as minimum wage does not apply to self employed but they are doing it. When Universal Credit comes in anyone self employed will be classed as earning the minimum wage for benefit calculations, this hasn't been 100% cast in stone yet but it will be because it has been suggested.

 

So if you claim WTC and claim you are working the minimum 16 hours that disabled qualify under you need to make a profit of 16x6.19=99.04 a week or 5150.08 per year. If you dont they are stopping peoples entitlement. Under UC it is suggested that your income from self employment will be calculated using these figures whether or not you actually earn that much, so it lessens the amount of benefit you are entitled to in tax credits.

 

They want people to work but now they are telling you what you must earn. This is not fair on anyone, never mind those with disabilities trying to give themselves a bit of dignity and feel worthwhile in society.

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I have read a number of cases where people with disabilities have done this and HMRC review their working tax credit entitlement if their profits show that they are not earning at least the minimum wage. They are not supposed to as minimum wage does not apply to self employed but they are doing it. When Universal Credit comes in anyone self employed will be classed as earning the minimum wage for benefit calculations, this hasn't been 100% cast in stone yet but it will be because it has been suggested.

 

So if you claim WTC and claim you are working the minimum 16 hours that disabled qualify under you need to make a profit of 16x6.19=99.04 a week or 5150.08 per year. If you dont they are stopping peoples entitlement. Under UC it is suggested that your income from self employment will be calculated using these figures whether or not you actually earn that much, so it lessens the amount of benefit you are entitled to in tax credits.

 

They want people to work but now they are telling you what you must earn. This is not fair on anyone, never mind those with disabilities trying to give themselves a bit of dignity and feel worthwhile in society.

 

 

Not everything that is suggested ends up happening....

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it isn't that is quite true but the White Paper has already stated;

 

For Universal Credit we are considering introducing a floor of assumed income from self employment for those registering as such. The floor will be set at the National Minimum wage for the reported hours; clearly profits above this limit may be received and reported."

 

It has been well reported that this transfers into the self employed will be treated as earning the minimum wage and this will be used for the calculation of tax credits, housing and council tax benefits. I am not in agreement with this myself but sadly it is still 99% certain it will happen. Sadly a lot of people have used becoming self employed as a loophole to claim maximum tax credits while not actually operating a proper business and then claiming they don't earn any profit or little profit year after year.

 

 

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure I've read people on here having issues with HMRC, WTC and minimum wage. The thing is, when you work 16 hours self employed, you're doing things like advertising, sorting out a website, accounts, etc. and not actually seeing clients or doing work for someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more, I think it is wrong that they are doing this and a lot of genuine s/e people are suffering as a result.

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which means you're going to many s/e people packing in their business and going on to benefits.

 

Indeed! My husband is self employed but earns nowhere near minimum wage. Come UC, he will have to give up self employment and just be a carer (he gets carer's allowance for me).

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I shall be giving it up too, because I don't earn minimum wage out of my self employment. So there we have it, 2 people just in this thread. The unemployment figures are going to be looking good aren't they lol

Tbh that's the only reason I think there's a chance it wont happen.

I think it should happen if people are making zero profit all year & claiming full tax credits, but they wont like the unemployed figures taking the nose dive that will be inevitable. So.....

 

Just worked mine out, about £3.30 an hour I make in profit. That's based on £100 for 30 hours. For the next 2 yrs I could drop to 16 hours on paper I guess, (I work at least 40 hours to get that £100 a week because I enjoy it) but once daughter leaves school something will have to give anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a thought I have had about this situation, no doubt it is full of pitfalls and danger because it basically means telling porkies, so I don't know if it's doable. (Is that even a word?)

 

At present HMRC are taking people to task to provide s/e details regarding income and profit. If you don't earn the minimum wage, you risk being told they are taking your WTC away and I know some people who have had to pay back a lot of money. One I have read about has to pay back over £6000, which gets paid back out of her benefits because she isn't earning from her business anymore.

 

What is there to stop you inflating your takings to make it look like you earn at least the minimum wage. I know it is illegal but how can it be proven if you put down you have taken more money than you have? If you reduce your hours to 16, which is enough hours if you are disabled then that would be worth £100 a week in wages. You would get full WTC (less the £790 30 hour element), full HB & CTB and not pay tax because it is well below the tax free allowance.

 

I realise it can't be as simple as that and it does involve being rather naughty to say the least but if you are earning the minimum wage, the chances of any HMRC check are minimal anyway. So what is to stop people doing it?

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a thought I have had about this situation, no doubt it is full of pitfalls and danger because it basically means telling porkies, so I don't know if it's doable. (Is that even a word?)

 

At present HMRC are taking people to task to provide s/e details regarding income and profit. If you don't earn the minimum wage, you risk being told they are taking your WTC away and I know some people who have had to pay back a lot of money. One I have read about has to pay back over £6000, which gets paid back out of her benefits because she isn't earning from her business anymore.

 

What is there to stop you inflating your takings to make it look like you earn at least the minimum wage. I know it is illegal but how can it be proven if you put down you have taken more money than you have? If you reduce your hours to 16, which is enough hours if you are disabled then that would be worth £100 a week in wages. You would get full WTC (less the £790 30 hour element), full HB & CTB and not pay tax because it is well below the tax free allowance.

 

I realise it can't be as simple as that and it does involve being rather naughty to say the least but if you are earning the minimum wage, the chances of any HMRC check are minimal anyway. So what is to stop people doing it?

 

You can't really put down that you have earnt more than you have as people like me that sell on line, have the evidence right there. I don't ever worry about proving I am working the hours I am down for, the things I make actually look like they should take longer lol & that's before taking into account photo taking, advertising time & post office trips/accounts etc.

The only worry is, since I became self employed in April I have only earnt £100 per week in the last month. Even though tax credits & housing benefit are based on me earning £100 per week & have been since april. The last thing I want is to be paid too much housing benefit though, been there done that bought the t shirt! So I prefer to be under paid. I only have to pay £26 per week towards my rent anyway. I can deal with that. It wouldn't be worth me having them pay more. My LA have not followed up on my estimate of £100 per week when I first claimed, even though they asked for my first months accounts, & I earn't about £75 per week. And also even though I asked a couple of months ago, I still haven't got my accounts back which I need for my tax return eventually!!

I think it's safe to say my LA are pretty pants from my experiences lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never thought about the online bit but take the point. I just think it is a crying shame when people who are trying their best to scratch a living and in doing so contributing to society, they get screwed over. We all know that minimum wage rarely happens for the self employed, especially in the early years of a business. It is especially hard for people with disabilities, self employment for people in this position is very common and very often this is the only way they can work. At least if you're s/e you can fit in what you can, when you can, you can't do that with an employer.

 

I have no doubt that this in an enormous faux par by the Government and completely against their beliefs of entrepenuerial spirit to boot, that as you say will result in more people being unemployed.

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never thought about the online bit but take the point. I just think it is a crying shame when people who are trying their best to scratch a living and in doing so contributing to society, they get screwed over. We all know that minimum wage rarely happens for the self employed, especially in the early years of a business. It is especially hard for people with disabilities, self employment for people in this position is very common and very often this is the only way they can work. At least if you're s/e you can fit in what you can, when you can, you can't do that with an employer.

 

I have no doubt that this in an enormous faux par by the Government and completely against their beliefs of entrepenuerial spirit to boot, that as you say will result in more people being unemployed.

 

It's going to be epic. I know of one lady doing what I do, & she makes NO profit at all, & hasn't done for the year she's been self employed now. Pretty sure she buys a lot more supplies than she probably has to if you know what I mean! So she needs to sort that out! But even so, she'll be no better off than me so we'll both be on benefits for a while.

I'm a bit stuck between a rock & hard place, my son is in 6th form, some days goes in at 10am, comes home at 1pm, some days 9am til 1.30pm, sometimes only there an hour etc etc, it varies everyday. He can't get a bus to school. So it's only me to get him there & back.

I could work nights, but when do I sleep in the day then?

At the moment this works round 2 kids in school. I'm lucky that by the time the changes come in you're talking about, my 2 will probably have left school. Phew!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...