Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hitler showing off  Won't here a thing Dx
    • Yes it was all car parks if you look at the PDF you can see where I went in. IMG_0230.pdf
    • little hitler. can't do anything. no entry sign was probably in a carpark did you get his name. reg. badge.  number? dx
    • Hello today I mistakenly went through a no entry sign on Silverlink Retail Park by Pizza Hut/Five Guys, there was no near miss and no other vehicles were affected. Unlucky for me I was spoken to by an off duty police officer who showed me his ID, he said he was going to report me for it and was a bit shirty! I said to him it’s private land and I didn’t realise. He didn’t take my name and he didnt ask for it, he was with his wife and young child at the time. IMG_0228.pdfHe took photos of my car and tried to take a picture of me, I covered my face. I took a picture of the sign as you enter the estate and it clearly says the roads within the retail park are not part of the public highway. Anyone think anything will come of it?   IMG_0228.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capability Issues

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4285 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

So this has happened to a friend of mine. I haven't been at the company for a while now but I often catch up with him from time to time.


Recently he hasn't been doing to well in his job, he's been there a good few years now but his targets have started to slip, so a few months ago he was placed on capability, understandably a bit miffed but accepted it.


A week ago the line manager apparently sent out letters informing my friend of the date of his capability review, he did not receive this letter so the line manager asked verbally if he could attend. My friend told the line manager that he "will not verbally agree to be there as I am attending my daughters parents evening".


The line manager then wrote the following in a letter sent to head office: "


XXXX has not attended their capability review, I was informed that they had not recieved their letter but XXXXX would not verbally agree to the meeting as XXXX said they had to attend a parents evening, I have not had any written confirmation of this to this date."


So my friend went to the parents evening and then on the same day took said letter from the school into the line manager and asked if the letter to H/O could be amended or a new one sent to reflect the now current evidence. The line manager looked at the letter and refused to send the evidence or a new letter or the amended letter.


My friend was so angry they were about to resign on the spot, the only reason they didn't is because of their kids.


I think the concern here is that H/O take the, now proven false, information and use it to discipline my friend - what rights does my friend have? Any help would be much appreciated.


Many Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems simple, but if it were me I would write directly to Head Office putting your friend's side of the story - ie that he understands that a report was submitted which indicated that he was due to attend a parents' evening on the day of the review - an appointment which had only been requested verbally - but that no evidence of this had been provided. Your friend has provided proof of the parents evening and asked the line manager to resubmit the report to the office confirming this, however for reasons unknown he was unwilling to do so. Conscious of, and concerned that the tone of the original report appeared misleading in that it stated that no proof had been provided, he would like the enclosed copy proof of the parents evening added to the file as an indication that a prior engagement was the the genuine reason for not being able to attend the review meeting, which was not apparent from the way in which the line manager's letter was worded.


Hope your friend is seeking alternative employment - it seems from the tone of your post that they are in the process of managing him out of the business!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.






If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...