Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell portfolio was compucredit was providan national bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello me again.

Got two threads going this one and Lowell portfolio was barclaycard

 

I have been getting calls from Lowell portfolio and have asked them verbally for a

copy of an agreement,

assignment notice,

default notice and

details of last payment to them as I am pretty sure that it is not a kick in the bum off being SB.

 

they have now provided a 'reply card' as a form of an agreement

now saying they are 'entitled' to payment now as they have produced this copy of a card?

 

I'm going to get it uploaded tonight if I can if not it will be tomorrow.

 

I have got the stop calling letter ready to send for this one in the morning as they had the stupid idea to call me at 8am on a Saturday morning,

before that they rang every morning at around half 8 just as we were trying to get ready for work and school!!

So they have officially annoyed me!

 

The date on the reply card is 2001 and it's for £2500.

 

No idea if this had PPI on but I'm going to do a SAR request this week to see where I stand and officially request the information.

 

Am I right in thinking that if they then do not provide all the information in the SAR then the account is then in dispute and they can not then technically take this to court??

 

Thanks people appreciate the input!!!

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking that if they then do not provide all the information in the SARlink3.gif then the account is then in dispute and they can not then technically take this to court??

 

 

No, you can only put the account into dispute if they fail to comply with a CCA request.

 

They are not obliged to provide the agreement or terms and conditions with a Subject Access Request. Bizarre, I know, but the agreement is covered under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

The SAR is covered by the DPA 1998 and if they dont comply with the request for data within the 40 calendar days, then you can either issue a claim against them in order to have a Judge force them to comply or you can make a complaint to the Information Commissioner

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm....passed three times around already

 

bet its SB'd

 

when was YOUR last financial transaction on it?

 

does this show on your cra file?

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, please bare with me, really new to all this,

 

I'm going to ask a few questions,

 

is it better to send the SAR or cca or do both?

 

Better half far more supiour at this.

 

And what's the best way to get on to your cra file?

 

I have been guilty of burying me head up my own bottom,

 

which Im finding to my cst is not the way forward.

 

Again thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

see below for the CRA file

 

noddle is free.

 

as for the other bits

 

lets see if this debt & your other one show first.

 

might just be a case of firing off a single letter

 

but get the CRA first please.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the signature date being Mid- 2001, I would also suspect this is SB. Do you know when the last payment or acknowledgement was for this debt?

 

Also the document they provided is non-compliant. No T&C's, No loan amount, No interest rates, No repayment terms.

If it's not SB, then its definately not enforceable.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

any late payments since 6yrs from today?

 

me thikns if you add up ALL the late payments and add their int

 

that will wipe the debt out?

 

use

This second spreadsheet is a compound interest calculator and can be used both for PPI claims and Charges Reclaims on Revolving Credit Accounts such as credit cards. Compound interest is not an award that foslink3.gif will give in respect of PPI claims but it can be used in PPI cases that are pursued through the courts. It is the standard sheet that is also used for charges reclaims both on credit cards and loan accounts where interest in restitutionlink3.gif is claimed.

 

CISheet v101.xls

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI DX thank you for your help.

 

I have looked through what they ahve sent me and its not all copy statements

its a computer printout of what looks like activity on the account.

 

The total late fees start mainly in feb 2005 and are every month.

Then overlimit fees are added.

 

Total for the whole lot is £708.

 

I need to do your spreadsheet and work out the interest

but I also need to look into a payment that they have on the account for June 2007.

 

I'd not paid anything prior to that one payment sinec the start of March 2007

so cant understand why I would have paid something in June.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah the old phamtom payment trick.

 

if push comes to shove

 

you need to ask for the complete details for that payment

 

like who paid it

from where

 

etc etc

 

VERY common trick for one of the DCA's in the chain to add a phantom payment record

 

esp in early in 2007 ,

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

GRR how unfair!

The letter that accompnied the printout (I'll not call them statements as there is only 2 copy statements the rest is an account activity print out from what I can gather)

stated that now they have provided statements they are ENTITLED to payments!

 

Can I string this out till worst case June next year do you think since its so close to being SB??

Link to post
Share on other sites

GRR how unfair! The letter that accompnied the printout (I'll not call them statements as there is only 2 copy statements the rest is an account activity print out from what I can gather) stated that now they have provided statements they are ENTITLED to payments! Can I string this out till worst case June next year do you think since its so close to being SB??

 

Yes you can correspond with them and it may take a while for you to have the information you need.

 

I would suggest that you sit down to look through what they have sent and to write down every entry that you can possibly query. You are entitled to know the details of any payment made. Who paid it, the method of payment. If by debit/credit card the card number used, if by cheque details of the cheque received.

 

You might also have a query regarding the calculation of interest added to the account and require a complete breakdown of the calculation.

 

Then send them a recorded delivery letter requesting the information.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha ha, silly little children.

 

Do they not realise that we all laugh at their silly letters? C'mon trolls, your no longer the ones with the power of knowledge, so stop wasting paper and sending out your junk mail in the hope that someone falls for it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well Lowells have been very busy!

 

Had 4 letters from them.

1) We regret to note despite previous correspondence regarding your account we have not recieved payment or a valid reason for non payment.

 

2)Despite the fact that we have offered you numerous oppotunities to resolve the debt it remains outstanding.

Payment in full is required in 5 days or applying to have the debt secured on your home, deductions of earnings along with court costs and interest.

 

3)FROM RED DEBT COLLECTION SERVICES (REGISTERED ADDRESS EXACTLY THE SAME AS LOWELLS)

Recovering what you owe.

Lowell have passed your account details to us so that we acn collect the money you owe on their behalf.

you must now pay us £XXXX.

We are specialists in assessing accounts for litigation.

so we will be obtaining a copy of your credit file in order to review your financial circumstances

and the information in it will help us decide the best way to recover what you owe.

 

They then go on to say possible CCJ with the same as the 2nd letter from Lowells

or they could serve a statutory demand upon where you do not then repay petition for bankruptcy.

 

Letter 4 to follow!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter 4 from LOWELL GROUP

 

in regards to the letter recieved into our offices from you on XX Of October which referred to concerns raised by you.

 

I have investigaged your concerns and this letter sets out the results of those investigations.

 

Summary of complaint :

Telephone calls

 

.Findings:

I apologise for any distress or if you have felt harrassed by our pursuit of this outstanding balance.

I woudl advise that this is not our intention and the all our proceedures comply with regulations and codes of practice laid down for the industry which we operate our business,

 

however following reciept of your letter all telephone numbers have been removed from our systems.

 

I have investigagted all calls that have been made and I would advise that we hold 2 accounts in your name.

 

In regards to this account I feel it is fair to advise that following your request for documentation the account was put on hold and no further calls were made.

 

I would also advise that the documents have been provided to substantiate our claim for both of the accounts held in your name.

 

As a result of this you would need to contact us to discuss a payument plan.

 

The accounts have been placed on hold for 28 days to allow you sufficient time.

 

It then goes on to give details of the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...