Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Loose wheel nuts!


Graeme Taylor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

When driving out of town, and getting up to speed, the day after paying over £1,100 for a service and the recommend remedial work my front wheels nearly fell off. Can anyone tell me what sort of compensation I should be accepting for having the lives of a friend, other road users and myself put at risk?

Thanks in advance for any advice proffered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you suffered any damage to the car, for example the hub bolts, hub or wheels / alloys or anything else?

 

How were they loose? were all four/five nuts loose/off on each side or was it one/two? etc..

 

I think a complaint to the place that carried out the work would be a start. They may offer a discount on the next service, although your rear wheels might fall off too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When driving out of town, and getting up to speed, the day after paying over £1,100 for a service and the recommend remedial work my front wheels nearly fell off. Can anyone tell me what sort of compensation I should be accepting for having the lives of a friend, other road users and myself put at risk?

Thanks in advance for any advice proffered.

 

Nearly fell off would suggest that the studs have been rocking against to holes in the wheel.

 

Both the studs and the wheel should be replaced. The slightest mark on the wheel of stud can cause the wheel not to be central.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The slightest mark on the wheel of stud can cause the wheel not to be central.

 

Simply not true.

And it won't be the studs rocking against the wheel either.

 

Post #2 is the way to go or though I'd ask for the discount to be refunded straight away.

 

No a lot more can happen without getting into what car, what type of wheels, how many times had the wheels been off before etc. etc. etc. etc. etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After driving at speed for only a few miles we had to pull over because of the dreadful noise and vibration. When we checked the wheels pretty much all the nuts on the front wheels were able to be tightened or removed by two fingers.

My question is regarding the level of compensation, whether financial or in free service, I should reasonably expect the garage to be offering. If anyone has suffered or heard about this type of negligence, I would be glad to hear about the final settlement between the car owner and garage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My brother had similar problem with his Vauxhall zafira he had rattling noise in passenger front wheel when local garage removed wheel cover they found one wheel nut lose in the cover. He spoke to dealer they could not give a **** they were then reported to Vauxhall uk with a report from local garage. Do not know any more that that.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ring the garage and ask them to come out and check the car to see what was wrong or did you just do them up and drive home. I no they were loose but would have been worth playing dumb and getting the garage to come and find out for themselves then you would have more of a chance to claim something back from them after the amount you've just paid them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've had this happen twice. New tyres fitted all round to a van and the next day there was an odd noise, I looked in the mirrors, the wheel didn't look right as as I pulled into a layby the wheel dropped off and there was a row of nuts up the road behind me. Problem is the invoice, not that anyone reads it, does say that you should check your nuts after 20 miles. Whether they correctly did them up and torque set them I don't know and I think it would be difficult to prove.

 

Last time it happened I didn't even have an invoice as hadn't been charged - had a slow puncture, or so I thought so dropped into a garage. They had the wheel off, dropped it in a tank of water but no visable air leak hence nothing they could do, so they dropped it back on. Not much attention seemed to be paid to putting it back on but I'm a belt and braces person so when not much tightening force was applied I just thought well they're the pro's. Few days later wheel dropped off.

 

Both times no damage was caused, just lost a couple of nuts so had the inconvenience of sourcing new ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After driving at speed for only a few miles we had to pull over because of the dreadful noise and vibration. When we checked the wheels pretty much all the nuts on the front wheels were able to be tightened or removed by two fingers.

My question is regarding the level of compensation, whether financial or in free service, I should reasonably expect the garage to be offering. If anyone has suffered or heard about this type of negligence, I would be glad to hear about the final settlement between the car owner and garage.

 

 

Alloys or steels ?

 

Best advice, don't go back to the same garage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grahame, i know you don't want to hear this but in law it is the driver who is responsible for the safety of the vehicle. In practice, the vast majority of us put our faith in tyre fitters and servicing mechanics--sorry, technicians.

Im my area, all the wheel fitters zip up wheel studs / nuts with an air gun then put final tightness on with a torque wrench. More than that they really can't do.

The above posts offer excellent advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is set procedure for tightening wheel nuts (studs) and it sounds like it hasn't been followed.

 

Wheels nuts cannot be tighten enough while the wheel is suspended in the air.

 

After initial tightening, the car is dropped to the ground and torqued up (tighted) while the wheels are on the ground.

 

If a car is driven with loose wheel nuts. The studs and perhaps the wheel may be damaged. It is possible both may need replaced. You need to take the car to a garrage to get this checked. IF they are damaged, you can expect them to pay for the corrective work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you even show that they had the wheels off during the service? You will run into difficulties trying to prove it was their fault as you presumably tightened them up yourself after noticing (I would have) and also you have done a bit of driving since the service. And if the garage is being crafty they'll say that you could have had the wheels off yourself. It's going to be hard to prove a causal link. Best thing to do is see if they'll offer any form of redress and if so take it and move on (and go somewhere else next time)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...