Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What is a new partner liable for?


Mother's Little Helper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4202 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If person A goes to live with a person B who pays for children through the CSA and person B then becomes unemployed but is not entitled to any support because of the living together rules and person A's income, what of the person A's income and capital have to be declared to the CSA?

 

I hope this makes sense and someone can help. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ros1609. I wonder if I could ask a further question. If the person paying child support is not receiving an income and gets no benefits because the new partner is supporting them does the ex partner, who used to get payment via the CSA still get those payments? As you may be able to tell this is all new to me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if the partner who was paying CSA isn't earning any money then he/she can't pay the CSA. However if there is an agreement then arrears will be accruing and the CSA will eventually chase them for some form of payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if the partner who was paying CSA isn't earning any money then he/she can't pay the CSA. However if there is an agreement then arrears will be accruing and the CSA will eventually chase them for some form of payment

 

Thank you Ros1609. So, for however long the person is out of work and no money is being collected by the CSA a cost will be accruing that will have to be paid? How would that be calculated? Also will the ex partner still be receiving a payment through the CSA or does that payment entirely depend on what is coming in from the person who has been paying the CSA until they lost their job?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok once an agreement is made via the CSA then it cannot broken until the child(ren) concerned are out of full time education or the parent receiving the CSA money advises the CSA the agreement can be stopped. Provided the CSA have calculated the amount to be paid and the monies are paid through the CSA (so the non resident parent pays the CSA who then pay the parent with residency) then if the payments stop arrears will accrue. However the parent without residency may well have informed the CSA whats going on so you really are better off speaking to the CSA and seeing what is going on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok once an agreement is made via the CSA then it cannot broken until the child(ren) concerned are out of full time education or the parent receiving the CSA money advises the CSA the agreement can be stopped. Provided the CSA have calculated the amount to be paid and the monies are paid through the CSA (so the non resident parent pays the CSA who then pay the parent with residency) then if the payments stop arrears will accrue. However the parent without residency may well have informed the CSA whats going on so you really are better off speaking to the CSA and seeing what is going on

 

Thank you so much. I am just a concerned parent whose grown-up child now lives with a (so called) non resident parent although they have the children for only a little less than the resident parent - something like one day per month. As I understand it my child's partner has always paid for the children but obviously now there is no income available my child is supporting the partner and the children when they are with them. My child seems to have been drawn into the ex partners anger at the loss of child support and I wondered just how much legal liability there was. I also wondered if the ex partner was still receiving the child support or if it stopped with my child's partner's inablility to pay. It is obviously a difficult situation all round and I thought understanding it might help me not to say the wrong thing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, if someone becomes unemployed, with no income, regardless of what their partner earns, they wont be liable for CSA payments? If they claim JSA, they would likely have to pay about £5 per week, but I wasn't aware that arrears will amount over time? Is that definitely right? My brother pays £5 per week out of Incap benefit & has done for years, but did used to pay more when he was working, but isn't in arrears?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok once an agreement is made via the CSA then it cannot broken until the child(ren) concerned are out of full time education or the parent receiving the CSA money advises the CSA the agreement can be stopped. Provided the CSA have calculated the amount to be paid and the monies are paid through the CSA (so the non resident parent pays the CSA who then pay the parent with residency) then if the payments stop arrears will accrue. However the parent without residency may well have informed the CSA whats going on so you really are better off speaking to the CSA and seeing what is going on

 

It is correct that the NRP cannot unilaterally change a CSA agreement once it is made, but just to be clear - if the NRP's circumstances change, the agreement will be altered to take account of this. So arrears will not normally accrue during period of unemployment as long as NRP pays the £5 per week standard deduction from their benefit.

 

In other words, if NRP stops making the required payments, then arrears can build up, but the required payments will be changed based on NRP's circumstances.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is correct that the NRP cannot unilaterally change a CSA agreement once it is made, but just to be clear - if the NRP's circumstances change, the agreement will be altered to take account of this. So arrears will not normally accrue during period of unemployment as long as NRP pays the £5 per week standard deduction from their benefit.

 

In other words, if NRP stops making the required payments, then arrears can build up, but the required payments will be changed based on NRP's circumstances.

 

Phew. That would have tipped bro over the edge if his original payments of £500 per month were building up whilst he's unemployed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...