Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global Stayed County Court Action cap1 card


potman100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3322 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I've browsed through this section looking for an answer to this but can't seem to find one !

 

I received a County Court summons from Wilkin Chapman Grange Solicitors in July on behalf of Arrow Global, who had purchased some outstanding credit card debt from Capital 1.

 

I filled in the forms online and denied the debt, I also submitted a CPR 31.14 request to Wilkin Chapman Grange Solicitors, they responded to the request and said they would grant an extension of 8 weeks so they could supply the documents and give me time to answer them.

 

It's now been 11 weeks and I still have not received an answer to the CPR 31.14, I have also contacted the court and they have said that the case has been "stayed".

 

My question is, Is there anything I need to do ?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

Regards

 

Potman

Edited by potman100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a written confirmation of the stay from the court? I believe this should have been issued if the case is stayed. If not request one from the court and wait for the responses to your requests for info.mI am no expert, but I am sure someone with more knowledge than me will be along shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact the solicitors asap requiring clarification of the statu s of the claim.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

tedney : No I'ved not received confirmation in writing from the court, I will contact them and request it.

 

BRIGADIER2JCS : Will do, Ill write to them so there is a paper trail.

 

Just wanted to try and stop them reopening the case in the future, from what I have read in the forum, Arrow Global

seemed to try any thing.

 

I was wondering if I could make an application to the court to have the case struck out, but I'm not sure about this.

 

Thanks for your reply's.

 

Regards

 

Potman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi potman,

 

It's a good job you submitted a defence denying the claim otherwise they might have got a judgement by default.

 

They would not have been able to grant an extension of that period, I believe the max would have been an additonal 28 days on top of the original 28 days and written confirmation would have been required by the court from the claimant.

 

The courts don't seem to send any further correspondence nowadays but I think that is simply down to not having the resources.

 

How old is the Capital 1 debt? Did you ever request a copy of the CCA from them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dotty50

 

Yes, think that's what they were trying for as I had ignored all there letters up to the court summons.

 

The last payment I made was about 3 1/2 years ago, no I did not request the CCA, but the CPR 31 was

worded as :

 

"a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement"

 

Along with the a default notice request.

 

Regards

 

Potman

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not really sure what the purpose of writing to the solicitors would be potman and I certainly wouldn't believe anything they said anyway!

 

If the court have said it's 'stayed' then maybe try to get their confirmation for your paper trail.

 

Andyorch's (site team legal expert) advise is usually to leave well alone for a little while and then request a strike out a little later, if you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dotty50,

 

Yes, I tend to agree with you, the bit I'm unsure about is how to request that the case be struck out.

 

Regards

 

Potman

 

I think you have to make an application to the court, form N244, download from the court web site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tedney

 

Yes, thought it was that form, not to sure on grounds or the order I'm requesting though, do you think I would make the application

on the grounds they have failed to complete the CPR 31.14 Request in the required time frame, I believe that

the reason it was stayed in the first place was this.

 

And would I be right in thinking that the Order is : Struck Out ?

 

Regards

 

Potman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah Tedney beat me to it, yes that's the form but I've never done one so I can't help but there will be someone on here that will or send Andyorch a pm with the link to your thread and I am sure he will put you in the right direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Potman responding to your PM.

 

Have you made application?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me have a quick scan of your thread and see if this is advisable at this stage.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so Summons issued in July claim stayed since August.Its personal choice potman whether to make application to force the matter..its not a case of make application to strike out rather ask the court to force them to disclose and if they don't force the issue with an or else order.

So poke the bear or leave it stayed..there is a fee for the N244 application to consider (this may require an hearing subject to how you make the application and which CPR requested).

 

If you made application and they did disclose and the claim proceeded would you be prepared and does you defence have merit?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andyorch,

Wanted to try and stop them restarting the claim in the future, if they did restart the claim, I would probs struggle with my defence, so it might be better to leave it stayed and see what happens !

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Potman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets say the claim has been stayed for longer than 6-8 months and you are prepared to fight the claim further you may consider application to lift the stay and force the claimants hand.Another angle is to invite the Claimant to withdraw on the pretense that you will make application request Summary Judgment in your favor and ask for costs...bit like poker and who blinks first potman...something for you to consider.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi

 

Ok, here's the back ground to the current issue I'm having with Arrow Global.

 

In July last year I received a Summons for an Credit Card Debt from Capital One, the claimant was Arrow Global.

I filled a defence that I did not know who Arrow Global was and I had never had any dealings with the company, and I request that the claimant provides verification of their claim, including a lawful contract; a hand signed invoice in accordance with Bills of Exchange Act (1882) and proof of agency in the defence.

 

Along with this I also submitted a CPR 31.14 Request to their solicitor, who wrote back and said it may take up to 8 weeks to complete the request and agreed to an extension.

 

I heard nothing more from either the solicitor or Arrow Global, in approx November last year I decided to contact the County Court to enquire what the status of the claim was, and they told me that the claim had been stayed as the claimant had not provided the documentation requested as promised.

 

Got home tonight and got a rather large letter from Arrow Global, the letter contained :

 

My Original Contract With Capital One (Signed)

Terms And Conditions

Statements of the account

Notice Of Assignment dated from March 2011.

 

The Notice Of Assignment is just a letter from Arrow Global.

 

They have given me 14 days to respond or they say they will put the items sent in from of the Court.

 

What do I do now ?

 

Thanks In Advance For any help.

 

Regards

 

Potman100

Link to post
Share on other sites

You were lucky you did not end up with a CCJ judgement by default if arrow would have pushed it

 

An example, i bet they never told you to apply for a strike out once the claim had been stayed. That is why it has raised its ugly head again

 

Not having a pop at you, why on earth did you not get a free 30 minute consultation with a solicitor the first time round instead of some garbage found on the internet

 

Bills of Exchanges Act is 1882

 

Law of Property Act is 1925

 

Which one do you think holds the statutory authority now in court???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Squaddie,

 

Yes I take your point, to be honest I did not thinl they would be able to provide the documents, and the thread I read at the time seemed convincing.

 

You live and learn.

 

Regards

 

Potman

Link to post
Share on other sites

They provided a letter with Notice Of Assignment with the papers I received this morning, but this is the first time that I have seen this letter. They say in the cover letter that they sent it on the 1st March 2011.

 

The only default notice i can remember receiving was from capital one, probably in 2010.

 

Regards

 

Potman

 

They provided a letter with Notice Of Assignment with the papers I received this morning, but this is the first time that I have seen this letter. They say in the cover letter that they sent it on the 1st March 2011.

 

The only default notice i can remember receiving was from capital one, probably in 2010.

 

Regards

 

Potman

 

The Wording on the letter titled : Notice Of Assignment is :

 

Capital One has assigned all of its respective rights, title and interest in respect of the above account (including the right to receive payment of the outstanding balance)

 

hope this helps.

 

Regards

 

Potman

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...