Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debehams Visa & Store card unknown PPI charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Morning Everyone

 

After reviewing the Consumer Forum, I discovered that I might have a very strong case for claiming PPI charges back from Debenhams/G E Money.

 

I opened a Visa Card account back in 2002 and on looking through the statements (luckily I kept them all) it has an item each month described as

 

'Account Cover @ 150 Pence per £100 Bal'

 

I do not really know what this is. An analysis I did on Excel shows that I paid £773.84 for this.:?:

 

 

 

My questions are: -

  1. Is this something I can reclaim?
  2. If so, how do I go about claiming?
  3. What interest, if any, might I be due?

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning Everyone

 

After reviewing the Consumer Forum, I discovered that I might have a very strong case for claiming PPI charges back from Debenhams/G E Money.

 

I opened a Visa Card account back in 2002 and on looking through the statements (luckily I kept them all) it has an item each month described as

 

'Account Cover @ 150 Pence per £100 Bal'

 

I do not really know what this is. An analysis I did on Excel shows that I paid £773.84 for this.:?:

 

 

 

My questions are: -

  1. Is this something I can reclaim? - yes
  2. If so, how do I go about claiming? see below
  3. What interest, if any, might I be due? card rate

Thanks in advance.

 

 

you have them

you have the statements.

 

fill in the cisheet here>

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

 

fill out the fos CQ here:

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

and a covering letter like:

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Department

PO Box 9131

51 Saffron Way

Leicester

LE18 9DE

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Re: Providian Visa owned by Barclaycard Account **** **** **** 1459

 

I am writing in relation to the above payment protection (PPI) policy which i believe was mis-sold to me in relation to my visa card.

I believe you have not treated me fairly for the following reasons;

· The PPI was added without my knowledge..

· You have been punished by the Financial Services Authority for failing to treat customers fairly and I do not believe that the PPI I bought was sold in my best interest.

Unless you can prove that the policy was fair and reasonable and that I was treated fairly when I was sold the insurance, I demand a full refund of all premiums, and subsequent interest on these payments, that I have paid in relation to this policy. I also expect 8% interest to be added to each payment I have made as this is the statutory amount a court would pay.

I look forward to your full and prompt response to this letter. If this matter is not settled within eight weeks of this letter I shall be contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate my complaint.

This letter is in respect of the above account that was issued by Providian Credit cards.

Yours faithfully

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx thanks for the quick response. Before taking your excellent advice, is the reference to Barclay Card correct as it was a Debenhams Visa card through G E money?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have them

you have the statements.

 

fill in the cisheet here>

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

 

fill out the fos CQ here:

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

and a covering letter like:

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Department

PO Box 9131

51 Saffron Way

Leicester

LE18 9DE

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Re: Providian Visa owned by Barclaycard Account **** **** **** 1459

 

I am writing in relation to the above payment protection (PPI) policy which i believe was mis-sold to me in relation to my visa card.

I believe you have not treated me fairly for the following reasons;

· The PPI was added without my knowledge..

· You have been punished by the Financial Services Authority for failing to treat customers fairly and I do not believe that the PPI I bought was sold in my best interest.

Unless you can prove that the policy was fair and reasonable and that I was treated fairly when I was sold the insurance, I demand a full refund of all premiums, and subsequent interest on these payments, that I have paid in relation to this policy. I also expect 8% interest to be added to each payment I have made as this is the statutory amount a court would pay.

I look forward to your full and prompt response to this letter. If this matter is not settled within eight weeks of this letter I shall be contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate my complaint.

This letter is in respect of the above account that was issued by Providian Credit cards.

Yours faithfully

 

 

dx

 

See below

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx thanks for the quick response. Before taking your excellent advice, is the reference to Barclay Card correct as it was a Debenhams Visa card through G E money?

 

Thanks

 

no thats just an example to adapt

 

send your claim to ge money

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also got poi charges from capital one and mbna card (mbna card balance is clear). Is it worth a go to claim these as well?

 

YES!!

 

same process

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX alot. I am completely shellshocked. I have kept the statements for all the accounts (Capital One, Debenhams & MBNA). Before entering the details onto the spreadsheet, would the third one be correct for me?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

CISHEET if you want to poss go the court route if it fails

 

FOSrunning if you dont fancy court

 

this one is poss the best IF you have all the details

 

pers i'd use the CISHEET [no.2.]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX alot. I am completely shellshocked. I have kept the statements for all the accounts (Capital One, Debenhams & MBNA). Before entering the details onto the spreadsheet, would the third one be correct for me?

 

Thanks

 

This morning I received a call from FOS to say that my complaint with MBNA had been upheld. Apparently, I made a complaint about this particular PPI claim sometime ago and the initial assessment by the FOS has upheld my complaint. Sorry for being so dim, but what does this actually mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

money is yours

 

you claim is successful.

 

if you have a quick serch on MBNA

 

you'll see a couple of recent MBNA threads

 

whereby they produce very nice [& apparently correct] FOSRUNNING type spreadsheets

 

thats what you'll get back.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

money is yours

 

you claim is successful.

 

if you have a quick serch on MBNA

 

you'll see a couple of recent MBNA threads

 

whereby they produce very nice [& apparently correct] FOSRUNNING type spreadsheets

 

thats what you'll get back.

 

dx

 

Hi Dx, thanks for the quick reply. I still bit unsure as the lady from the FOS said this was initial assessment and at this stage MBNA can get a review (not sure what this meant). What exactly does the FOS mean by this?

 

The FOS also says that nothing has been logged for Debenham's.

 

In relation to the Debenham's claim:

(1) I have drafted the letter as set out above.

(2) Filled in the complaint questionnaire.

(3) Started putting in the statements on to the spreadsheet.

 

My questions are:

 

(1) Do I need to send the questionnaire with the letter?

(2) Do I need to put any amounts on the letter?

(3) Was the best way to send the e.g email, recorded delivery?

 

Thanks again Dx for making sense of all this for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as i know

 

you dont need to do anything more yourself.

 

mbna will be told to cough.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as i know

 

you dont need to do anything more yourself.

 

mbna will be told to cough.

 

dx

 

Hi all. Thanks for that. This might sound like I am being greedy, when do you believe I am likely to get the money?

 

Also, if you have the time, could you please give me advice on the questions about Debehams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

anything up to 8 weeks if this is the firs they have known about it.

 

.. as for debs PPI

 

post 2 detailed what to do

 

FOS CQ + SOC + covering letter.

 

to GE Money

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
anything up to 8 weeks if this is the firs they have known about it.

 

.. as for debs PPI

 

post 2 detailed what to do

 

.

 

FOS CQ + SOC + covering letter.

 

to GE Money

 

dx

 

 

Good Morning All

 

At last I have manage to complete

(a) Initial letter

(b) Completed the PPI questionnaire

© Spreadsheet that works out what is due.

 

After discovering some more paperwork floating around my loft, I discovered that a claim of mine was rejected in 2010 as a result of a head injury suffered in 2002. I remember at the time asking if I would be covered for sickness, in particular any secondary problems I had as a result of my head injury and the sales person said YES, which was obviously a lie. Therefore, I am looking to be fully compensated for this useless PPI I took out.

 

Now to start the Cap One claim!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont want to slow you down in anyway but be aware this is a pre 2005 GE Money storecard.

 

All the reasons in the world why it was a missale wont be looked at.

 

If you look around the forums you will find they will defend by saying they were not regulated and FOS will agree.

 

You will be sent to the FLA who will want nothing to do with it and then perhaps be sent down the underwriter route. There are people who seem to be stuck about 3 years into these claims being batted from pillar to post by different organisations none of which want to take responsibility.

 

Still worth complaining as you never know what will happen in the future but just to be aware there are many many threads about pre 2005 GE Money now Santander storecards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont want to slow you down in anyway but be aware this is a pre 2005 GE Money storecard.

 

All the reasons in the world why it was a missale wont be looked at.

 

If you look around the forums you will find they will defend by saying they were not regulated and FOS will agree.

 

You will be sent to the FLA who will want nothing to do with it and then perhaps be sent down the underwriter route. There are people who seem to be stuck about 3 years into these claims being batted from pillar to post by different organisations none of which want to take responsibility.

 

Still worth complaining as you never know what will happen in the future but just to be aware there are many many threads about pre 2005 GE Money now Santander storecards.

 

Hi KEN

 

Thanks for the message. I got the card and loan out in Nov 2005. I believe this is OK because the new guidelines came in Jan 2005. Does anyone know whether this is correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cgowers.

 

Apologies if I have miss read this thread just your initial post stated a GE Money Debenhams card taken out in 2002. The storecards were sometimes upgraded to dual store visa cards.

 

dx is correct 2005 is the date Santander will entertain a PPI reclaim as normal (if you have a good enough reason)

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning All

 

Received a pleasant surprise in the post yesterday, an offer for Santander to pay me money!!

 

The breakdown is as follows: -

 

Premiums £260.22

Interest £287.81

Loss of Cash £131.49

 

Total £679.52

 

From my own analysis (kept all the statements) I paid premiums of £773.00. If I accept this amount (will be able to afford xmas) could I still in due course make a complaint about the remainder of the premiums I believe I am due or if I cash the cheque, that is that?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you have PPI payments that total £773 even before intererst?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you have PPI payments that total £773 even before intererst?

 

dx

 

Yes, based on an analysis I have done on Excel. From what I understand, Santander are only offering £260.22. That is why I am asking advice whether I should chase the remainder?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

then surely if your PPI is £773 BEFORE interest,

the comp int will at least double the £773 figure!

 

so you're prob £1k short here?

 

not something i would accept

 

post up your SOC

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...