Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds credit card debt , iQor and gpb solicitors


Red1983
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, haven't been here in a while but wondered if someone could help me please.

 

Credit Card pre 2006,

arranged a pro rota agreement in 2006,

and paid minimum amount,

went to a debt collector,

and arranged 20.00 per month.

 

Last payment made was in 2011, and decided to request CCA with the DCA at the time.

 

I rec'd a letter stating that payments had been made towards the debt however Lloyds have advised that they cannot provide a CCA as the debt is too old,

and although unenforceable it is still owing.

 

They went on to say that Lloyds have offered a settlement figure previously for half of the original debt, and this still stands.

 

I took that as Lloyds did not fulfill there obligations under the CCA act and thought to thyself that if they were to take me to court then they'd be stupid just because of the admission.

 

Have had a few DCA letters still attempting to chase the debt but I know of them so have ignored.

 

However, Rec'd letter from iQor, ..

. I ignored...

but have now had letter from gpb working on behalf of iQor stating that they want payment within 10 days otherwise a county court claim may be issued without further warning.

 

Now normally I'd egnore it, but I just needed someone advice as to wether the letter I had from the original DCA would be a defence in court if it did indeed go that far?

 

Should I send a whole new CCA request?

Or should I send a letter, including a copy of the letter from the original DCA

 

I just don't want to shoot myself in the foot by assuming, so any advice would be much appreciated as they are demanding payment within ten days and gpb seem to be a legit solicitors.

 

Thanks so much to anyone that can help.

 

Red

Righteousness & Justice Will

One Day Rule

:p:p:p:p

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

want payment within 10 days otherwise a county court claim may be issued without further warning

 

There is your answer in red.

they can issue without notice but the court will tell you what they are trying to do. i'd send them a copy of the letter you got stating no CCA

PHOTOBUCKET TUTORIAL IS NOW DONE HERE IT IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, I did think that too.

What do I do though if they turn around and say that you made payments to the debt so therefore you have accepted liabilty? I have'nt at all, just didn't know my right at the time of making the original arrangement.

 

How does this sound for the letter:

 

Dear Mr Doe,

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to any company.

 

A CCA request was made in 2011 to Blah Blah DCA, please find enclosed their response.

 

In light of this, you will see that Lloyds TSB have acknowledged that they have not been able to fulfill their obligations in accordance with the CCA 1978 and therefore is now unenforceable at law.

 

I look forward to your final response, as any further pursuit after this will be seen as a breach in the DCA collection guidelines.

 

Yours

 

Red (Not my real name) lol

 

Or something along these lines?

Righteousness & Justice Will

One Day Rule

:p:p:p:p

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are offering a discount

 

IGNORE!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To whom it may concern

I am in receipt of your letter dated xxxxxxx received xxxxx.

I must admit I am rather bemused at your threat for court actions in regards to the above debt, of which I DO NOT acknowledge.

Lloyds TSB are already in breach of providing a true copy of the original CCA agreement , and a copy of such admission is enclose for your per-usual.

I am sure that as a solicitor I do not need to remind you of the obligations a creditor is obliged to abide by under the CCA 1978 and the SI's contained within.

In short, let me reiterate, Lloyds TSB have not been able to provide a copy of the said agreement and therefore is unenforceable at law. I therefore request that any further pursuit stops now, or I will be reporting you and iQor to the relevant authorities for breach of the OFT debt collection guidelines.

I look forward to your final response.

Righteousness & Justice Will

One Day Rule

:p:p:p:p

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd not bother.

 

did you ever SAR LLoyds

if they are offering a discount

 

it'll be PENALTY charges &/or PPI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

gpb sols stratford? they are legit sols, but seems as if they like others are allowing their name to be used re dca threatograms. as said 'may'. not quite a letter before claim.what is the contact number on the letter? is it iqor? still owned by loyds? if so, up to loyds to decide on any legal action and if doing so they usually use their own sols. if decide to write, one 'dispute' letter to iqor should suffice to see them off.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, bless you thanks for this.

 

Theres about 1000.00 in charges and PPI, and yes I did SAR them and were only able to provide statements for the last two years, not the whole time which is about 12 years!

 

Didn't realise that Lloyds would use their own sol's. This has given me peace.

 

Thanks very much indeed.

 

Red x

Righteousness & Justice Will

One Day Rule

:p:p:p:p

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much. Will get on with this tomorrow. Off to bed now, but will keep updated incase it can help anyone else.

 

Night night

 

Red

x

Righteousness & Justice Will

One Day Rule

:p:p:p:p

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about something along these lines

 

Your letter is incorrect and frivolous, you are fully aware of legally valid reasons why no payment has been made on this account,

namely that the agreement which underpins this account has not been supplied despite a perfectly valid request and furthermore,

it is suggested that notwithstanding the failure to supply a copy, the agreement itself is improperly executed,

devoid of all prescribed terms and deficient in respect of detail relating to APR, total charge for credit and statements of rights ,

remedies and protections as required by schedules 1,2 and 6 Consumer Credit Agreements Regulations 1983

 

Therefore the agreement as outlined in section 65 (1) Consumer Credit Act must be laid before the court to be granted an enforcement order before any further action can be taken

 

It is my view that the court would not grant such an order due to the deficiencies that I have outlined within the agreement,

 

further more this has already been raised with (names of previous DCAlink3.gif's / Bank here)

yet I note they have still assigned the account over to yourselves and the absence of any documents disproving my points itself speaks volumes

 

Therefore, I would indeed welcome the opportunity to place this before the court.

 

furthermore should you proceed with the threats to issue a statutory demand or a court claim I will make an immediate application to have it set aside for the grounds outlined above,

also I shall refer the judge to this letter when the matter of costs falls due

 

I trust this outlines my position clearly enough for you

 

Yours faithfully...

 

(You could also add -

 

I am a great advocate of recycling and have enclosed your previous correspondence for your recycling operation

- Paper recycling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

- This site gives some useful information for your company's recycling effort

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Lloyds credit card debt , iQor and gpb solicitors
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...