Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suspended for of Breach of staff discount policy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This may sound off topic a bit, but I was suspended with pay last weekend for 'breach of staff discount policy'

 

What happened was I was called in by the Duty Manager and told that I was to be suspended with pay pending an investigation about my staff discount. It was relating to the purchase of an laptop and return of a laptop.

 

They had given me the dates at which it had occurred but I didn't remember it at the time. So I just commented as I didn't remember.

I came home and thought about what was said, and the dates that the purchase and return were made and then it clicked in my mind.

 

What I think had happened, was that my uncle came into my store to purchase a laptop on the date mentioned, and i had offered my staff discount for the purchase as you would, he is family of course. I was there when the purchase was made, but he had obviously paid for it at the discounted price.

 

Nonetheless, my uncle is happy with the laptop.

 

However, I went to purchase the exact same laptop for my dad's birthday (on the day of his birthday) as it was a good offer from another store but I didn't have my staff discount with me at the time, so i paid the full amount by cash. Low and behold, my dad didn't want the laptop in the end lol. So I ended up returning it back onto my card in the store i work at a few days later at the full price that I paid.

Why I put the return back onto my card was because I knew the till wouldn't have the £300-400 at the beginning of the day, so my manager's told me that its ok to return it back onto the customer's card if thats easier for them.

 

I did this well within the 28 day refund policy period and that was the end of it and I threw away the receipt.

 

 

What I think they are looking into is that the fact that I had returned the the exact same laptop a few weeks later back onto my card, at the full price, thinking that i have 'abused' the staff discount which is not even the case! But as I do not have my receipt, what can i do to defend my case? I was told i was to have a hearing next week.

 

So I don't know how I will be able to prove that I didn't just 'allow my uncle to purchase a laptop at a discount, then I return it at the full price on my card' - cos that's how they see it right?!

 

My uncle still has his receipt, so what can i do? I don't have the one i used to purchase my one any more! :( Please help. I don't want to get sacked or dismissed or disciplined, I haven't done anything wrong or harmed anyone and its stressing me out that something will happen to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was suspended with pay last weekend for 'breach of staff discount policy'

 

What happened was I was called in by the Duty Manager and told that I was to be suspended with pay pending an investigation about my staff discount. It was relating to the purchase of an laptop and return of a laptop.

 

They had given me the dates at which it had occurred but I didn't remember it at the time. So I just commented as I didn't remember.

I came home and thought about what was said, and the dates that the purchase and return were made and then it clicked in my mind.

 

What I think had happened, was that my uncle came into my store to purchase a laptop on the date mentioned, and i had offered my staff discount for the purchase as you would, he is family of course. I was there when the purchase was made, but he had obviously paid for it at the discounted price.

 

Nonetheless, my uncle is happy with the laptop.

 

However, I went to purchase the exact same laptop for my dad's birthday (on the day of his birthday) as it was a good offer from another store but I didn't have my staff discount with me at the time, so i paid the full amount by cash. Low and behold, my dad didn't want the laptop in the end lol. So I ended up returning it back onto my card in the store i work at a few days later at the full price that I paid.

Why I put the return back onto my card was because I knew the till wouldn't have the £300-400 at the beginning of the day, so my manager's told me that its ok to return it back onto the customer's card if thats easier for them.

 

I did this well within the 28 day refund policy period and that was the end of it and I threw away the receipt.

 

 

What I think they are looking into is that the fact that I had returned the the exact same laptop a few weeks later back onto my card, at the full price, thinking that i have 'abused' the staff discount which is not even the case! But as I do not have my receipt, what can i do to defend my case? I was told i was to have a hearing next week.

 

So I don't know how I will be able to prove that I didn't just 'allow my uncle to purchase a laptop at a discount, then I return it at the full price on my card' - cos that's how they see it right?!

 

My uncle still has his receipt, so what can i do? I don't have the one i used to purchase my one any more! :( Please help. I don't want to get sacked or dismissed or disciplined, I haven't done anything wrong or harmed anyone and its stressing me out that something will happen to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have moved your post to it's own thread - that way it is likely to be read by more people.

 

You say that you bought it from another store? Within the same company? If so, then could they not use EPoS data to prove the purchase and verify your story?

 

You say that you bought it on offer from another store but then returned it for the full price at your own branch? Something definitely sounds strange here, and in the way that you have outlined it, I think I would probably be suspicious!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Did you actually fully explain to the store Manager the circumstances of the refund, and were then given the Managers approval to refund to your card as a normal customer?

 

OR

 

Did you assume that the Managers policy is just to refund to customer so although you are an Employee but purchased the item as a customer refunding the money yourself would be within policy?

 

What is the companies policy on refunds to employees?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I did move it to my own thread.

 

And yes it was bought from within the same company.

 

Would they go through my history of staff discount as in the case of the person who originally posted this thread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the store manager has not been involved yet. It was a paid suspension meeting pending a further investigation.

 

I was told on a few occasions that by my line manager that in the event of such happening. It is ok to put the refund back onto the customer's card, if thats the easiest and the the best thing to do at the time.

As many people reading this may know, the tills would not contain alot of money during the beginning of the day, especially hundreds of pounds worth. But i did not process the refund myself, if thats what your asking. I had a colleague do it, and I was being a 'customer' off duty before my shift at the time.

 

The company's policy i think is to refund it the way the customer had paid, but in this situation. That would of been hard to do with hardly any money in the till?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 threads merged

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Remember yes you were told that by your line manager as a "CUSTOMER" but you were also an "EMPLOYEE" and put that refund through to your own bank account without speaking to or getting authorisation from the store manager.

 

You need to remember the way the Employeer is seeing this.

 

1. You already gave Staff Discount to a Family Member/used your staff discount for same laptop.

2. You then purchase same laptop at full price for a cash purchase.

3. You the return the same laptop to the store your employed in for a refund.

4. You then proceed as an Employee to put through your own refund through the companies equipment to your Card without discussing and getting the store managers authorisation.

 

can you see what the employers may be thinking?

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid by credit card just take in the statements. If you laid by cash take in the cash withdrawal slip or statement showing you took out cash. Borrow uncle's laptop so they can see you still home one.

 

Job done.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you paid by credit card just take in the statements. If you laid by cash take in the cash withdrawal slip or statement showing you took out cash. Borrow uncle's laptop so they can see you still home one.

 

Job done.

 

Theres no cash withdrawals, as I had the cash on me, I guess I had it at home. I never specifically went to withdraw the money if I already had it. But yes, as you have mentioned, I have the laptop at home, well my uncle's home which is like next door to me. How can I use that in my favour? He's got the receipt for it too.

Edited by dj1234
Link to post
Share on other sites

check the policy allows you to buy for family members, show that you still have the item you got on discount?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they not keep record of serial numbers of laptops in stock? You could show that the one returned was not the one that was purchased by your uncle

 

You are right, there are serial numbers and EAN's of the laptops. BUT, as the laptops are 'all the same' - as in the same model, the same make etc, they have the same EAN barcode if that makes sense? They just keep track of the stock they have, not each individual serial number of the item.

Link to post
Share on other sites

check the policy allows you to buy for family members, show that you still have the item you got on discount?

 

I'll check, but I think it states they have to be in the same household, but how would the store know if they lived in the same household as me? He's my uncle right? Although If im honest, he lives a few doors away from my house. But technically I'm at his house every other day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

um. So you have breached the policy. Just in a different way to the way they think you have.

 

Well, you can lie if you like but it's easy to get caught out. I'd fess up and expect a warning.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right, there are serial numbers and EAN's of the laptops. BUT, as the laptops are 'all the same' - as in the same model, the same make etc, they have the same EAN barcode if that makes sense? They just keep track of the stock they have, not each individual serial number of the item.

 

Oh ok, was wondering if it was like mobile phones where they track the IMEI number against stocks

Link to post
Share on other sites

um. So you have breached the policy. Just in a different way to the way they think you have.

 

Well, you can lie if you like but it's easy to get caught out. I'd fess up and expect a warning.

 

I will go and tell the truth that it was for a family member. and that member still has the product and receipt.

 

The one I returned, was unwanted by myself bought from another 'branch store' and returned onto my card as there was not hundreds of pounds in the till at the time of the transaction and my line manager has OK'd the fact that if that is the situation, it is at the discretion of the customer as to whether you would like it go back onto your card.

 

It was signed by another manager to ensure it was a valid return and that the item was behind the till and for what reason it was returned. If they were unsure of this, they should of not of signed for the refund to be clear?

 

I don't know if that's the right thing to say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should of been clear about the refund, and how it was done. It was done like any normal refund is done.

 

check the product > Check the receipt > check its within the 28 days > ask if they would like a refund or exchange > scan the returned item and check it matches the price & description on the receipt > issue refund in form of how it was paid, but in this case it was OK'd to return it onto the card as It was at my discretion. I didn't mind having that. As long as I got the money the back.

 

So what would be your advice? To produce the item and unmarked receipt? Although they have just said I was to be suspended with pay pending an investigation to what they find.

 

Which I obviously know what they are going to find, but they don't know that I know that if that makes sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And should I really be disciplined for this? Just out of interest. I can understand they wish to investigate it and they have the right too, as I can see how it looks. But if they know the facts, that I've outlined, should I be disciplined?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to move the 'proof' thing along. Stores are required to complete a TV Licence registration when selling items capable of receiving TV broadcasts - would that not be the case here as that registration would be adequate proof of purchase?

 

Was this a laptop as in your first post, or an iPad?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But laptops do not require registration, I don't think they do. And as I never filled any form out, I don't see if that would be needed. The product I returned was unopened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - so was a Wireless telegraphy Act registration completed at the time of purchase of either device?

 

EDIT - crossed post. The Act is supposed to cover every device which is capable of receiving TV broadcast live or 'as live' including screening. I know my daughter had to fill in a form when she bought a laptop.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your problem is 2 items the same, one for someone not resident with you. That'd be a minor disciplinary to me, may be a major to them. (What are the odds you need 2 identical laptops in the house? Looks most odd.) I don't think the sale and return to cc is as big a problem - is he problem the other way round where purchase and return is used as a cheap cash advance facility!

 

However we an only guess what the sanction wold be, we don't know how seriously your employer regards this. Some of the supermarkets have sacked for this. Some would give you a slap on the writ.

 

If you are given a policy you stick to the letter of it or yes, you can be disciplined.

 

All you can do now is sit back and fully cooperate with the investigation.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...