Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Agency work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4217 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm trying to help a friend reclaim PPI on a Lloyds Credit Card, he opened the account in 1999 and at the time was a temporary worker for an agency.

 

I know that would be a reason for mis-sold if it was a loan but would it still count for a credit card?

 

He didnt get a full time job until 2 years after getting the card so would he just be able to claim for that period?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's another good argument to use then.

 

He's just had his claim rejected by lloyds, applied for the card in the bank and was told by one of the staff to add ppi as it would better his chances of being accepted for the card, yet has just been told the staff would never have said anything like that.

 

I don't know how the complaint handler knows what was said in a branch 13 years ago!

 

Also in his original complaint he just added 8% stat interest but am i right in thinking you use the interest rate they were charging then add the 8% on top of that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should get back the premiums paid plus any contractual interest added as a result of them. The account should be reconstructed without the PPI and if in any period the reconstructed account shows a credit balance then 8% simple is paid on that credit balance for that period.

 

If the account is closed and paid off, there will be a difference between the balance actually paid and the reconstructed balance and 8% simple is paid on that difference running from the date the account was paid off to the date of settlement of the claim.

 

Have you got ALL of the statements of account? If not you won't be able to calculate the amount due back.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was only sent statements to Jan 2000 so missing the first 7 months of the account.

 

Should i now use the 4th spreadsheet and work out the interest on each charge at the APR they charged at the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also i've noticed in their rejection letter that they state the policy booklet at the time would have shown any exclusions in making a ppi claim.

 

So would it still be a valid argument to use that he was a temporary worker or would they just say it was his own fault for not reading the terms and conditions correctly?

 

After a lot of reading and getting very confused am i correct in thinking you can only claim compound interest on each amount up until the account was closed? (2006)

Edited by shutmeup
Link to post
Share on other sites

Could anyone advise me if this calculation is correct as i'm getting in a pickle!!

 

PPi charges from 2000 to 2006 - £626.17

contractual interest until 2006 - £1029.23

 

Then do i add the 2 amounts together and claim the 8% simple from 2006 until now?

 

I've read too many threads today and my brains turned to mush now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should still complete the third spreadsheet I linked you to.

 

As you are missing 7 months then pick up the account at the point you do have information for.

 

Where it asks for the monthly spend, take the opening balance from the first statement you have and use that figure for the monthly spend. Then proceed as normal.

 

It won't be 100% accurate because you are missing the first seven months byt you could estimate that in the absence of any information.

 

If the account was closed and paid off, complete the sheet right up to the end of the account.

 

You will see that there is a difference between the actual balance paid off when the account was closed and the reconstructed balance per the spreadsheet. Enter that difference into this spreadsheet to work out the 8% due on that difference right up to date.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

You would be looking to get back the value calculated by the reconstruction spreadsheet plus the 8% interest calculated as described in this post.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...