Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

safeloans want intrest after 60days


chezelle82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4181 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok as said before you need to dispute it in full.

 

I'd submit the following as a defence to the Court:

 

On xxx date I borrowed £200 from Safeloans LTD which is a payday loan company, offering short term loans at xxx interest rate.

 

On xxx date I failed to repay the full amount of the loan due.

 

On xxx date I repaid the amount of xxx

(list payments made here)

 

Having repaid £380 I feel I have settled the debt with this company in full, the Claimant is adding fees and charges on this settled debt.

 

The additional charges and interest are not listed so I do not know how they have calculated these.

 

(Include any correspondence trail here for reference)

 

The Defendant would also like to draw the Courts attention to the fact that the Claimant has falsely claimed that there would already be a Judgement and claims the Defendant would have failed to make payment in accordance with the Judgement Order.

 

(add email you got on 12th oct here)

 

This is a statement of truth by xxx on xxx

 

You will need to insert some details like dates, but its essentially just an adapted version of the defence sillygirl1 posted here, cause why reinvent the wheel?

 

Then just send it off to the Court, recorded delivery of course.

 

Its a wee bit sneaky to put in the reference to the false claims from that email in the defence, but frankly safeloans deserves their tactics to be exposed to the Courts, plus it can't hurt if you can drag their credibility down to subzero with just one email.

 

 

 

t is essential that you contact us IMMEDIATELY, you are now in breach of the terms of your Loan Agreement, It may be that your debit card details have changed, or that there were insufficient funds in your bank, or that personal circumstances made payment impossible yesterday. Whatever the reason, you need to ensure that your payment is made today without any further delay.

 

At this point you can just ignore any such drivel safeloans sends you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fab thanks for your help in this matter I will get it written up and posted tomorrow, shall I send copies of payments I made to them and copies of emails they Sent or just copy and paste the email and add it on???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would add copies of proof of payment yes, plus a print out of the email from the 12th.

 

You could also still show it at the hearing in Court if it ever came to one, but frankly there is a reasonable chance Safeloans will be too scared to pursue you any further anyway after the Court has seen the email of a made up Judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We wrote to you just over a week ago but as yet you have not responded to our letter. You have still not made any contact or any attempt to pay the outstanding (CCJ) judgment debt of £227.81. We are now left with no option but to seek enforcement action in requesting an Attachment Of Earnings Order at your local county court on the 26/10/2012. We wish to advise you that if we obtain the attachment of earnings order this process will involve your employer providing the court with a certificate of your earnings and if a full attachment of earnings is granted the court will order your employer to make deductions from your salary. Additional fixed court fees will be added to the (CCJ) judgment debt.

 

This intended action can be avoided. We would rather mediate the repayment of this loan with you and have 3 repayment options for you to consider. Special Note: If you have previously entered in to a repayment plan with us and you have failed your repayment, the below options and offers will not apply to you. You must contact the office on 0208 6800990 please press option 2 and you will passed to a collections operative who will be able to assist you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely, what they've sent now is so bad it will put their claim with the court as well as their credit license in very serious trouble.

 

If you want to you can reply, something along the line of:

 

Something simple along the lines of this would do.

I have been in contact with the Court and what the Court said about the case does not match your version.

 

It should be enough to tip them off that they are in very serious trouble and hopefully they would then leave you alone.

 

If they then still keep sending stupid stuff, reply with a short time line:

 

April 2012, Court claim filed, no Judgement has been made according to the Court.

8th October 2012, Email received mentioning intent to file court claim.

12th October 2012, Email received with claim that a Judgement was obtained.

20th October 2012, Email received with different sum for same debt an d again the claim that there would have been a Judgement as weoll as the claim that the debt would have been passed to collections.

 

Above information complete with full supporting evidence will be presented in Court if there ever will be a hearing about eh claim, in the meantime it has been forwarded to the OFT, FOS, Trading Standards as well as the Media.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may think they are like the bullies at school who can get away with whatever they want cause the teacher has no real power, but this is the real world and there is no Teacher but rather a Judge and they won't get away with their bullying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So gets a letter off the court today along with my defence back saying i was over the 19days to get it back in from when the judgment Was requested???? Hold on there wasint any judgment when I rung up and If there Was it was well back in time :( they now want £80 to continue with the application....

Link to post
Share on other sites

they said they obtained a judgement on friday and she said i didnt get my defence back in quick enough i explained that i hadint recieved any paperwork and that i rung up last week and nothing was on file that they had requested or anything only saying about april where they sent a claim form out etc, and she said i must of done which i never she was a horrible womon i just checked my credit report and theres a ccj on that now!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets just sum up the basic info for now:

 

April 2012, Court claim filed by PDL Company Safeloans, no Judgement has been made according to information from the Court as per phone conversation on the 15/10/2012, you where not aware claim existed as no paperwork received from Court, Court promised to resend paperwork for defence and did so.

 

8th October 2012, Email received from Safeloans mentioning intent to file court claim if alleged debt is not settled within 14 days.

 

12th October 2012, Email received from Safeloans with claim that a Judgement was obtained and you supposedly defaulted on it.

 

20th October 2012, Email received from Safeloans with different sum for same debt and again the claim that there would have been a Judgement as well as the claim that the debt would have been passed to collections.

 

23rd October 2012, Letter received from Court that defence was submitted too late, phoned Court, information received that there was a Judgement made on 19th October 2012.

 

Correct so far? I'll see if I can get someone else to help on this as its seriously getting complicated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh thats correct they sent my defence back, no court order or anything If i want to appeal to pay £80 there as bad as safeloans, their saying(safeloans) i need to pay £227 its gone up within 28days plus my credit report now Has a ccj on it.....

Dunno Where to go from here

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they want the 80 for is having the judgement set aside, which would then essentially remove the ccj and safeloans would have to file a claim again giving you again time to defend.

 

but i'll see i I can find some other angle to attack from cause why should you pay for the Courts mistake?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what is needed here is a clear bullet pointed letter to the Court Manager as a Formal Complaint and ask for a judge to look at the case - state that you want mediation here as clearly neither the court nor the company seem to know what they are doing.

 

I would also copy in the Solicitors Regulatory Authority and the Ministry of Justice to be on the good side.

 

This lot seem to play dirty - you could also complain about the individuals who run the organisation to Croydon Trading Standards, the individuals also have another loan sharking company under the name of N Bolton in nearby George Street - I know because I go past their offices quite a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chez

 

You have 2 options here:-

 

Pay the difference outstanding (diff from what you have paid v the judgment amount) you have time yet and the CCJ will not be registered.

Make application to set a side N244 (£80 fee) and re defend the matter...assuming you have a defence with merit.You wont have a problem with the Set a Side as there is bad service here..but there is no point making application if your defence is not successful..just puts you back to where you are now.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defence is not a problem, the problem is getting the Court to look at it.

 

Yes, the usual way to go about it would be asking to have the Judgement set aside (which does cost a fee), but in this case the Court resent the paperwork to submit a defence just 4 days before the Judgement, surely the handling of the case can't be right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem lies with the Claimant on not ensuring it was served correctly (ie Address).As far as the court are concerned it was delivered correctly (or to the last known address).

 

Once the summons as been delivered the clock starts to tick (ie 5 days deemed served so 28 days (14 to AoS and another 14 to submit a defence ..if defending) the rest is just auto processed.No response to summons no AoS no defence therefore default judgment applied.This is requested by the claimant so they can hold this request indef (N225).

 

So now we have judgment with a time limit to pay the amount (usually 21 days in most cases unless forthwith) if chez pays the amount no CCJ is registered.End of the matter.

If chez wishes to set a side the claim starts again from issue.As I have stated no problem getting the set a side but this will only be granted if a reasonable defence is offered.Bad service is a reason for set a side but is not a defence.

The defence would be paid xxxxx already i think I only owe xxxx then the plea would be part admittance and a defence submitted. However he still gets a cCJ.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for the advice

 

Ive rung the court up and they said the judgment was obtained 19th so does this give 28 days to pay safeloans?? safeloans emailed and said i have till the 7th to pay as the judgment was obtained before the 19th they said, and they will remove the ccjs otherwise i will have to pay to get it removed..

Im confused What you think i should do pay the application or just give up an pay sl any advice will be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...