Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC & MBNA PPI reclaim - info / guidance required


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone - new recruit here.

 

These posts are fascinating

- thanks so much for sharing all this expertise.

 

I'd be very grateful for some advice on the following.

 

I had an HSBC Gold credit card that I paid off in 2003.

 

I closed the account then and didn't save the statements (probably a big mistake).

 

I'd like to find out if I paid PPI on them (I suspect I did).

 

I've called the normal HSBC credit card number and they have no record

and the Ombudsman also confirms that there's no legal oblication for banks to keep records for more than 6 years

but I should try putting in a subject access request.

 

Can anyone tell me of any other measures I can try and how likely it is that the information will still exist?

 

If part info exists,

how will my claim be calculated,

as I became self-employed in 1999 s

o think that I can only claim a refund from that time.

 

Thanks again for any advice. Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Clare I have started a new thread for you

IIt is a good chance that you will get some or all of the info by doing a full SAR.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually if they are saying they have no statements over 6 years old,they are telling porkies.

Have a read here;

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?347468&p=3808418#post3808418

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Martin

 

Thanks so much.

 

The plot now thickens and I'd be grateful for your further advice.

 

MBNA sent me a form to fill in which was based on some official form possibly the Ombuds or FSA docs.

 

I explained in there that I'd had a payoff when made redundant in 1999 so never needed to claim against my PPI

and that subsequently I became self-employed and so couldn't.

 

They claim that:

 

1. A&L set up the account and the PPI was sold before MBNA bought the account.

2. When MBNA took over, ts and cs were sent to me and I had 30 days to cancel - which I don't remember. They say that I had enough information to make my own decision.

3. When the PPI was transferred I was eligible (aged 18 to 70, UK resident and in permanent employment).. They don't say when they bought the account but I see that it was in 2003.

4. The complaint is being referred tot he previous lender but this is their final response. They suggest that I go to the FOS if I want to complain further.

 

I see that the FOS is held in low esteem on this site. What do you suggest I do next as I think I'm being fobbed off by a well oiled machine? I have some statements showing PPI.

 

Thanks very much.

 

Regards

Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi claire [hope this is not your real name]

 

your claims are both squarely with the current owner [mbna/hsbc]

 

i'd still fire off SAR's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10/10

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx thanks again. Do you think it's worth going to FOS - am I accepting this as MBNA's final response if I do or should I dispute their statement while talking to the FOS? I see that some people issue small claims court actions - at what point should that be an option and how much evidence do I need?

 

Kind regards

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

dispute mbna findings

 

they shold not be refusing a reclaim on one letter and upon mostly speculation.

that things should have happened like this & our systems are foolproof

 

the 'seller' if the PPI would have got a nice commission selling that to you too!

 

if you've not got the sar back yet, i'd await your reply til then.

 

poss put a holding letter in with the SAR

 

explaining you wish to see the the evidence they are using and will reply when

you have it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Dear Dx

 

Hello again

- I've now put in an SAR (dated 5th December) and checked on Fri that they had received it and the money; apparently it had just been put on the system that day.

 

So now MBNA are telling me that they have 52 days from my letter to get back (I've explained in my letter that I don't take this as their final response).

 

In the meantime I wrote to the Ombudsman and have had a questionnaire to fill in.

 

Should I do that as one of the questions is whether I've had MBNA's final response?

 

I've had what they say is their final responsoe and I'm saying that I don't accept that - what to do?

 

Thanks again for your help Kind regards C

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no need to yet fill out the FOS CQ

 

await the SAR return.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Mike

 

Hello again to you.

 

I am determined to sort this out in tribute to Martin 3030 as well as making donation to the site.

 

I've now had various print outs but some of the most salient abbreviations don't seem to be listed (no surprise there...).

 

Do you think an entry saying ins. cancel reason back in 2003 would be re a conversation about the unsuitability of the insurance as I was self-employed?

This was in Nov 2003.

There's also a ref to a conversation in April 2003 sayin that I wa sunhappy with charges on the account as I'd had no statements.

 

It also shows me ringing to complain in 2005 that the acc was still open though I'd asked for it to be closed 12 months earlier,

so much for the stance "ou gsystems never get anythign wrong" if proof were needed!

 

What else should I be looking for and is this the right moment to fill in the fos form?

 

Thanks again C

Link to post
Share on other sites

so it looks like the PPI was cancelled in 2003

 

have you statements for that period?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

D

 

I paid it off in 2003.

 

I do have some sample statements preceding that but not the full set.

 

However, the bank hasn't ever disputed that I was paying PPI.

 

I became self-employed in 1999 but never claimed on it even when made redunmdant in 1999 as got settlement from the company that made it unnecessary.

 

So, there was no way that I needed it.

 

Plus the fact that I never realised that it was optional.

 

Thanks again

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

await the sar then

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the FOS state you can use an AVG figure from what you do know

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx

 

Hello again - so the best thing for me to do now is to fill in the fos form? Is there anything that'd in the SAR that I should use as evidence? Or will the basic facts below do it ie:

 

1. I'd had a payoff when made redundant in 1999 so never needed to claim against my PPI

2. Subsequently I became self-employed and so couldn't. I was self-employed when MBNA took over in 2003.

3. Never realised that PPI was voluntary

4. MBNA saying that their ts and cs were sent in a leaflet doesn't mean that their systems are beyonf reproach, witness the fact the acc stayed open for a year after I'd closed it.

 

Thanks again - really appreciate your help and hope I'm not being too labour-intensive!

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

3- optional.

 

spread sheet

FOS CQ

statement copies

covering letter

 

all to the OC

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx

 

Thanks -is the OC the same as the FOS? Presumably I'd have to guess at the average amounts paid because I dont have statements for the full period? I think there will be info held by MBNA that shows amount that they maybe haven't sent if it's not covered by SAR so could they be forced to use that to work out compensation accurately?

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

OC is original creditor - MBNA

 

you calc the avg from the months you know already

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...