Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You're like, super helpful and unhelpful at the same time lol.   What do I search for, I searched form 4, and nothing, I searched claiming compensation and nothing about this.   I can't find the top squares logo.   Can you post a link or tell me what to search.   Sorry if I'm slow.
    • use our custom google search box  click our top squares logo it should appear on that page   dx
    • Apologies, I haven't used a forum for years!!   I defo wish to keep the 2 issues separate, sorry!   My only issue I need help with is the increased compo for marstons - if possible.   I don't know anything about claiming compo etc. (I only recently found out one of the NHS biggest costs are NDA payouts)   I don't know what form 4 is; so far, they've offered £250 and I haven't accepted or denied it.   So yeah, can you forward me to some more info?   Also, usually I'm good at google etc. but I can't find many stories on this stuff, regarding PCN/TFL etc.   Thanks again!
    • ok things are getting clearer...   I've merged 2 of your posts for clarity and removed the swearing, (behave please) I've also taken down the two images you posted should you wish to post things up please use PDF so we can zoom easily and don't forget to redect them read upload carefully.   I think you need to continue to keep the two thing sep. those being increased compo for marstons- if possible ( if you are raising a form 4? complaint through the court - it might be better you don't? - they are very hard to justify and can be costly - so the fact it might not be moving forward could be a good thing, but listen to others here too) and the issue of the PCN wasn't justified - which you need to further expand on please.   the more info you post up the better please but please use multipage PDF files only and carefully redact them    
    • Thanks for trying btw! It's kinda in 2 parts.   1 is that the PCN wasn't justified in the first place and I wasn't aware it had escalated. I received the initial fine from TFL which I challenged and heard nothing back from (for 5 months). Then another letter from a separate PCN which made me email TFL to inquire what was going on but again, heard nothing back.   (BTW I can see how confusing this is so thanks again for trying)   So, I had no idea my car was at the risk of being taken - that's the first part.   No 2. is:   I got a phone call saying my car was on the back of a truck round the corner from mine (they hadn't left any notices or anything, and the car was parked directly outside my house). My friend said they were attaching the straps and securing it to the van (so I think they got it on the back of the van and moved it before securing it).   When I ran round the corner I saw the EA's van. I went upto it and asked what was going on. He was rude and told me to go away. Then after I kept knocking he got out the van and was aggressive and refused to ID himself or tell me why he had my car.   He shouted at me, was rude and unprofessional, he then left with my car. I complained to Marstons and asked for the bodycam footage.   They gave me the footage but it was clearly edited and cut short (because in the beginning of the footage he was the most aggressive).   They then told me he wasn't required to have the camera turned on when he's in the van, only when he's 'actively pursuing a warrant' and I was only allowed the footage I was in. (which is 2 different things) So I asked them to clarify which is true.   Anyway, I reviewed the footage and sent in my complaint (talking about what happened in the footage) They replied and said they watched the footage and disagreed with everything I said.   So I wrote a more in depth response with the CIVEA code to reference + the TFL EA guide etc.    Then they asked for more time, called me and finally apologised and admitted he had acted untoward and was in the wrong.   They then offered me the goodwill payment.   This has taken up weeks of my time, caused me serious trauma and PTSD and even after I complained WITH video evidence, they still initially denied it which means they officially lied, on record, while representing TFL.   I told TFL what was happening they said I had to continue with Marstons etc.   £250 goodwill isn't enough, the car cost £800 to get out, the suspension is messed up and I'd like to claim compensation for everything.   I don't know if that makes me sound like i'm money grabbing or whatever but they shouldn't be allowed to get away with it.   The police had to come before they could call an ambulance cause I was having a panic attack and it was a HORRIBLE experience.    So any help would be great please    I have the whole file from Resolver in a ZIP file but it's a lot of writing and I think you've read enough of my writing to last a life time!   I did a statutory declaration of OOT, got it signed by the court etc. but it was rejected.   I then tried to take them to court but it cost £250 I think which I don't have. You can get it for free if your low income but they wanted bank statements that I couldn't get. They're waiting for me to reply with documents to get a free court date.    did you receive any of the pcn's - was that why you appealed? - Yes, sorry!   unless it's trying secure a greater level of compo from marstons? - Yes, sorry!   For the record I just saw this pop up, read it and now feel much less guilty about my enquiry!
  • Our picks

iklt

bailiffs at barclays canary wharf

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2749 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Three years ago it all went wrong work dried up i defaulted on personal loans, credit cards, overdraft, the options where bankruptcy or dmp as i am a home owner i went for the dmp option with no fees playplan plus i make monthly payments from my now reduced wages.

 

roughly it is 60k to about six creditors the biggest being hfc and barclays.at the rate i pay after essentials it will be cleared in 2045 if i dont croak i will be 81

 

i have had great success claiming ppi with the help of the template letters on cag (MBNA being the most difficult with there you ticked the box so it was non advised basis waiting for court date for that one)sent sar to barclays and got big envelope back had ppi on current account and claimed back £3500 of which £1950 they offset.

 

reading through the sar the account was changed to a additions plus account in 2006 but in 2000 to 2002 i had twenty pound charges totaling £780.00 pounds this got to me as the ppi was added to the account without my knowledge i might not have incurred these charges i knew they would be classed as statute barred because of the time but i wrote claiming financial hardship asking for a refund.

 

they replied saying sorry for inconvenience but the charges are statute barred and the charges where fair and where added because i could not manage my account properly.end off.

 

i left it for a couple of weeks and after a couple of sleepless nights thinking i was hard done too i thought i don't have much to loose so i put a claim in with MCOL after fourteen days no acknowledgment so i entered judgement three weeks later i had first letter from barclays special investigations team telling me i was relying on legal arguments which have been considered and rejected by the high court and the supreme court and not to try and execute a warrant and withdraw this claim as they seek to have the claim struck out and i would have to pay there legal costs.

 

Two more letters followed as the hearing got closer they did ask for it to be heard without a hearing but a date of 24/09/2012 was set at my local county court wrexham. rather than shake in my boots i thought give it a shot take all my dmp stuff and as far as the statute barred went would try and go with section 32 c of the limitations act(the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud concealment or mistake(as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it).in that respect i paid the charges mistakenly thinking they where lawful and the bank concealed there true nature.(ie they where unfair and disproportionate).

 

any way day comes and they send young lady who tells me on the way in she is the barrister for barclays and gives me a look as if i am something she had stood in.

 

I was expecting it to be struck out and award them costs but he was not impressed with the legal team at barclays and he could not see a defence and was annoyed they had not acknowledged the judgement (at which i piped up there was a communication problem at barclays HQ as reported in the press last week bailiffs had been there to remove computers and art work

 

she lost her way at this and implied i was out of my depth which made him more mad and she quoted OFT V Abbey National supreme court 2009 decision which she had no case law with her.And then asked for case to be struck out and them to be awarded costs at this point he asked if i had incurred any costs for attending as i am self employed i said loss of earnings

 

i thought for a moment he was going to give me judgement and we could all go home but he criticised barclays legal team and sympathised with her for not being sent with a propper defence and expecting him to throw the case out

 

he has given them 28 days to get things together and send a copy to me.he told me to write a list of my expenses and for the next hearing i left feeling bewilderd but not really knowing what my next move is or if i can get a result any help and thoughts would be helpful thanks in advance ian

Edited by slick132
put in paragraphs to make it more readable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello these forums are littered with stories of Barclays contempt not only for its customers,but in some cases legal process.Your story is not too surprising therefore,it just goes to show that nothing much has changed.

Is there anything specifically that you need help with-or questions you want answering ?


Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello these forums are littered with stories of Barclays contempt not only for its customers,but in some cases legal process.Your story is not too surprising therefore,it just goes to show that nothing much has changed.

Is there anything specifically that you need help with-or questions you want answering ?

hi martin yes do you think i should ask them to give me a breakdown of the twenty pound charge even though the oft considerd it unfair is this my strongest point as i gather no bank has explained there pre 2006 charges regards ian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ian.

So can you confirm that this was a current account/savings account /loan or what ?

 

I had a claim for pre 2000 charges in the middle of the OFT v Abbey case.

Barclays applied for a stay pending the Supreme Court ruling.

My arguement was that Judge Smith in the OFT v Abbey case had not looked at any historical terms and conditions.

Indeed Smith did say that whilst he was confident to rule on those conditions he had inspected,it was not to say that other terms and conditions could not be viewed as penalty charges or unfair.This would be a matter for Courts to decide.

I know of one case where one building society did pay up rather than face this arguement after it was pointed out to them that none of their terms and conditions was looked at by Smith in the OFT v Abbey case.

Barclays defended the historical claims on 2 points.

1.That the Supreme Court and Smith summaries deemed their charges were not penalties.

 

2.They maintained that their historical terms and conditions were materially the same as their later ones,and so would have the same effect in consideration of Smiths findings for those Barclays ones he did look at.

 

Remarkably,Barclays were unable to supply actual terms and conditions for their historical accounts,and made a sworn statement that a full search had failed to retrieve them from their archives.

In the end they produced Tariff sheets from around 2000.

Despite a very big internet appeal,I was unable to find any one holding these terms and conditions from circa 1999/2000 but dont for one minute believe that Barclays do not hold them.

I found something on one of their websites which boasted of archive material going back to the early 1900s.

In fact it mentioned a warehouse on the outskirts of Manchester which held documents in an area comprising of 2 miles of shelving space !!

I pointed this out to the Judge and the Barrister was not to quick to comment. Ha Ha.

 

Anyway back to your case.

What have you used in your Particulars of Claim ?

What are you relying on insofar as case law/statute ?

 

The limitation aspect is easily got round using s32c (I used this myself and it was accepted by the Court despite a fight from Barclays )

 

Given that you had requested the charges to be refunded based on hardship,there may be a case to use BCOBS.

Whilst the FOS will say that there is no obligations for banks to deal with issues more than 6 years old,there have been some cases.The FSA handbook says they consider 3 years after discovery to be acceptable.

 

Barclays will of course come at you with all guns blazing,and their favourite tac is to say if you withdraw the claim they will not seek costs,but if you dont,they will make the Court aware etc etc.

3 times I have has costs schedules sent to me at 7am in the morning by SD on the day of Court appearances.

It is essential that you are well prepared to take them on.

Please can you answer the questions posed above ?


Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi martin sorry for late reply the account first started out as a normal current account with overdraft that is when the charges where added

and then in 2005 it was changed to a additions current account then in 2007 it was changed to a additions plus where you pay a monthly fee for overdraft, breakdown cover,mobile phone insurance ect thanks for your reply i will do plenty of reading you have given me some great inspiration thanks ian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...