Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would have thought so but I'm no lawyer. What did the one that you spoke to say? You could also google about how/when a will trust is set up to get more of an idea before you speak to the original lawyer. HB
    • While I am waiting for the original solicitor to ring back about the will can I ask. After my dad passed they were informed about this an released a copy of the will to me and my brother, should they have set the trust up then as they were informed of his passing?   Thanks again
    • .. A tired little trump simply run out of wind ..  for a little while ...
    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Finn v Barclays **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6065 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Sent my inital letter 1/9/06.

I got a 'sorry you're unhappy' letter shortly afterwards.

Been working a way for a while so not been able to follow up.

Got a phone call last week apologising for the letter they'd just sent and saying that they were prepared to offer me £500 without any admission of liability.

next day I got two letters - one saying 'no chance', the other offering the £500.

 

As I hadn't had a chance to send a Letter Before Action, I've had to weld that and the Rejection of Offer letters together.

Does this look right:

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Mr McCoombs,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated 3 October 2006.

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totalling £1020.00.

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £1020.00 .

I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original letter of the 1 September 2006.

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Thanks for any comments in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good to me StevieFinn.

 

Just remember stick to your guns when the 14 days is up and do your moneyclaim.

Good Luck.

 

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hey Guys,

 

Bit of an update.

Entered my MCOL claim at the end of October.

 

Now, did I miss a trick here - I didn't keep an eye on the MCOL site? Should I have requested a judgement when the time was up which would have defaulted the judgement in my favour?

I didn't and the claim has now been transferred to the local county court.

Ah well, too late now...

 

I've got my N149 to fill in now. Looks like I might have a wait right through into the new year now - didn't reckon on it going on this long! I suppose its the attrition principle - the longer it goes on, the more who will drop out.

 

I got the full defense from Mr Ruffhead about how they think their charges are fair and how I must have known about them from the start of my dealings with them. They restate their charges (it even looks as though some of them have gone up, not down recently!!)

 

They also say that the 'Particulars of the Claim do not provide details of particulars of the precise charges alleged to be unlawful, or the date thereof'.

Now I sent a schedule of charges and dates to them initially. I didn't include the list of charges in the MCOL claim - there wasn't enough space. I suppose I didn't say what they'd described each charge as, but surely they can't claim I didn't tell them enough details?

 

Does anyone know if Barclays have got as far as going to court anywhere yet? If so, what were the outcomes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received my letter from the county court the other day.

 

It has two dates on it that I can see:

 

1) I need to send a list of disputed charges to the Court and Barclays by next Tuesday. I guess this is just my schedule of charges that I'm claiming back, including interest to date?

 

2) I then need to send all the documents I intend to use for the case to the Court and Barclays by another date a few weeks later (can't be more specific cos the letter is at home!). I assume this is the full court bundle which I intend to base on the one from this site (thanks!:cool: )

 

The one date I can't see is the actual hearing date. Does this come separately?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Notice of allocation from the court read "The hearing of the claim will take place on a date to be fixed at XXX County Court and should take no longer than an hour and then went on to list directions.

 

So it is possible that the judge is waiting for you to respond to directions before he fixes a date.

 

I would double check the letter again.

 

Peter

PETER RABBIT V BARCLAYS Settled in Full 05 March 2007

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Peter,

 

You were spot on. I have to send both sets of documents as part of the judges directions, then the date will be allocated.

 

One quick question.

I sent off my list of disputed charges, including interest upto that date.

I'm just about to compile my court bundle, which of course will include a copy of this list.

Do I keep the interest rolling up?

i.e. is my claim frozen when I sent the list last week, or can I claim interest up to the date of the court hearing/settlement (fingers crossed)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Thanks - With my bundle I sent two schedules one just showing the charges and another showing charges + 8% and clearly marked the second one "Schedule of charges plus 8% interest claimed under s69 Country Courts Act -interested calculated 21/01/07" - date I put together my bundle

 

Peter

PETER RABBIT V BARCLAYS Settled in Full 05 March 2007

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just putting my court bundle together.

 

This 'Statements' item on the suggested contents...

 

Is this a copy of all my bank statements which feature charges?

 

Or is it some other kind of statements? e.g. what I said in my particulars of claim on MCOL, what barclays said in their defence statement & what I said in my Allocation Questionnaire??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Whoah, that took a long time.

 

Sent my court bundle off back in January and have only just got a court date for July. Thought for a while that I must have made some kind of mistake and it had been thrown out. I guess the courts are just bogged down with these types of claims now.

 

Anyway, as the date approaches, I've started to get worried again (after months of putting it out of my mind). All the usual stuff about 'what if they choose my case to be the first to take to court?', 'what if I have made a mistake and they can pick holes in my case in court?'... all that kind of stuff.

 

I keep reminding myself that their defence boils down to 'well we think the charges are fair, but we can't or won't explain how'.

 

I haven't been on here for a while. What's the general situation at the moment? Have they been to court yet or are they still settling at the last minute?

Link to post
Share on other sites

which court are you at, Stevie? It must be REALLY busy!

 

You haven't missed any real changes: they still leave the settlement till the last minute...

 

But they're still settling.

 

don't know if you know about the recent BBC 'whistleblower' programme about banks, but I think it's really done them some harm.

 

Shame!:rolleyes:

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My case is being heard in Manchester.

 

Good to hear that they still settle. Does this mean they haven't let one go to court yet?

 

Just wondering, especially after the Lloyds judgement today. Not sure yet, but some posters on the Lloyds thread seem to imply that that case was lost because the claimant hadn't prepared properly (e.g. included statements to support the claim).

Did this go to court because Lloyd don't settle before the hearings, but Barclays do?

 

Oh, by the way, how does this Court Buddy thing work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was going to post this on the Successful claims thread, where I originally asked the question, but thought it better to put it under my own thread.

 

I'm due in court early next month.

I haven't heard anything from Barclays (or the court) since I got my date. In fact I don't think I've heard anything from Barclays direct since last year! (Apart from their 'defence' in the court papers.)

 

The question is, should I have received a copy of their court bundle, just as I had to send a copy of mine to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be time to give the litigation team a ring :)

Barclays Litigation Team Good or Evil? You Decide.. - Consumer Action Group

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone EVER actually SEEN a Barclays court bundle???

 

;)

 

 

Well, that's kinda what I meant.

No-ones seen them in court either, have they?

 

Are they supposed to send me a court bundle, though, as part of the process?

 

Just asking, cos I'd like to use it as an excuse for getting in touch with the litigation mob.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes .. they should send to you anything that they are going to rely upon in court to defend their claim ....... phone the lit team http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/94602-barclays-litigation-team-good.html several contacts on their . you might be advised to email Dino to find out who is dealing with your claim :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Mods: Please add **WON** to thread title.

 

Settled in full a day before court date.

 

Litigation staff (Sharon and especially Krysta) were great.

Friendly and professional.

 

 

:D

 

 

Oh, and a massive THANK YOU to the CAG guys. Brilliant website and a superb, warm and helpful community.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! Patience pays off!

 

nickyc

nickyc

 

26.06.07 Prelim letter sent

02.07.07 Acknowledgement received

12.07.07 LBA sent

28.07.07 Received Barclays standard OFT letter

29.07.07 Lost it :?

14.08.07 Recovered and back on track :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...