Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£100K Debt


GuidoT
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am trying to improve my negotiating position with the bank, I personally guaranteed a bank overdraft for a firm and the company failed, leaving me with £100K of personal debt.

 

This occurred about 3 years ago and for the past 15 months I have been paying off £1K a month and the bank has been content with this.

 

But it is time to negotiate with them again and I want to them to agree not to add to the debt charges and further interest.

 

Does anyone have anything specific that might strengthen my negoitating position, i.e. link to BCOBS stuff or similar that I can quote to the bank.

 

Thank you in advance.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably not much help, but I read a post from another CAG member earlier today who had also fallen foul of a personal guarantee. When he checked his guarantor agreement he saw a clause which limited his liability to less than what he had already paid out!

 

Here's the thread; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?366603-HSBC-debt-sold-to-Robinson-Way(3-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not looking for advice relating to the document itself, been through that already, I only need assistance confined to the charges and interest freezing.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a copy of the agreement from them recently then? To replace the original you lost yesterday?

 

Does it authorise the interest and charges that you are currently being debited with?

 

If it does you might want to get it defaulted. Stopping paying or reducing to £1 a month will do that.

 

Otherwise I would do your homework on how much your expenditure has increased recently and how much less you can afford. If you can - conduct the negotiation in writing.

 

If your credit rating is precious then ignore the above and put an excercise book down your trousers...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a copy of the agreement from them recently then? To replace the original you lost yesterday?

 

I think you must be getting me confused with someone else!

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be of help, if not google and see what comes up??

 

I looked at these and struggled to find my around them and anything specific on interest freezing.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a copy of the agreement from them recently then? To replace the original you lost yesterday?

 

I think you must be getting me confused with someone else!

 

I think that was meant as a rhetorical (not sure if that's the right word) question/suggestion. :wink:

 

i.e. have the bank still got a copy of the guarantee agreement should they need to enforce it? Only one way to find out .....

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see robcag, been down that road already, just need assistance with freezing interest.

 

Defaulting is not an option as the debt is secured on other properties that I do not want them to force a sale on.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How recently have you asked for and been provided with a copy of the guarantor agreement? It's just possible that if this was a while ago then they may not have one at present, bearing in mind that some of the banks have been particularly inept at retaining documentation in the past.

 

Sorry for sounding repetitive, just trying to help. :wink:

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Guido, both Bandit127 and myself I understand that you have a copy of the agreement, but as you haven't said otherwise, you've probably had it in your possession for some time, maybe it's the original copy you received at the time of signing.

 

The question that was asked was "how long since the bank provided you with a copy?"

 

Although you have your copy they may not have theirs, so if your paperwork was to be accidently shredded today and you needed to ask the bank for a copy of the signed agreement would they have the signed original in order to be able to provide such a copy?

 

I'll leave it at that. :smile:

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guido

 

Really not sure what to suggest beyond a time order perhaps, assuming its regulated and the securities are correctly stated within the PG it may be an option. My only concern would be possible costs exposure if the application fails.

 

Is the current default rate of interest charged simple or compound?

 

Can't think of anything that would be of use in leverage for an informal negotiation.

 

Which bank is this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the template I always use now, unless there's anything specific you're looking for that you think may speed up the response. Having said that it can sometimes be counter productive as most banks tend to 'lose' specific data if you give them the slightest indication of why you need it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

quite. eg, in one sar cred said no recorded calls available after 3 mths (luckily for them! and they did the 3 mths back from end of 40 day limit!). cf in another sar case (same cred, at around same time) they told a cagger no recorded calls after 6 mths!

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guido, you are not in a strong negotiating position as you probably know already. They know they have security for the debt. The only thing I can see where you might have an edge

is if you can pay off the debt quicker than the six and a half years or so outstanding. Then they might consider a reduction in the amount for a quicker return of their money.

 

It will be hard to get them to waive the interest and charges when they are holding that much collateral from you. That being said, it cannot hurt to ask and point out that you will be

able to pay them off quicker without the added burden of the extra costs. It might help if you could pay a larger monthly amount. Obviously you couldn't do that if you are having

problems maintaining your current payments.

Then you could try appealing to their better side by explaining you are having financial difficulties and would appreciate them removing the charges and interest from now under

BCOBS though I doubt they will agree to doing it till the debt is paid off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I forgot about this thread.

 

Various events unfolded, that led to my Business Manager becoming sacked and a whole load of revelations regarding his misconduct then followed, that I then took advantage that improved my negotiating position no end.

 

I just think the bank did not want their dirty laundry washed in public so they settled for £20K (of £150K in the end) a few months ago. A good result by all accounts.

Edited by GuidoT

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...