Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS and the Army


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6563 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My son went through Army basic training last year at Pirbright. While he was there, his course was given a presentation by someone from the RBS Farnborough, telling them all the advantages of opening an account with RBS. A number of them signed up and arranged for their pay to be paid into their brand new RBS account, including my son even though he already had an Abbey National acount.

He (my son) then arranged for two direct debits to be collected from his account. He then saw his error and emptied his account and then arranged to send his pay to his Abbey account but forgot to cancel his direct debits from the RBS. This started incurring charges, surprise, surprise. When he tried to cancel his RBS account four months later, he discovered that he would have to pay £170 in accrued charges first.

We discovered why his charges had escalated without his knowledge. When he passed out at Pirbright, he was posted to Deepcut but his address was changed to Aldershot??? How did this happen?

The Army use a system where anyone with an RBS account has their address changed to their new unit automatically and without the account holder's knowledge.

Is this legal?

Therefore all of the bank's letters were being sent to the wrong address hence the accrued charges.

Initially, the bank refused to repay the charges, but soon after a telephone conversation between my self and the so called military manager, the charges were repayed in full. I simply threatened the bank with Ombudsman action.

There are a few other anomalies which I won't bore you with here, but I have complained to RBS customer service and they have replied saying that they have done nothing wrong.

i.e. It is OK to open an account without the neccesary photo ID and proof of address.

It is OK to change an account holder's address without their knowledge.

I have now received the bank's final response letter and am about to contact the Financial Ombudsman Service to inform them of the RBS' policies, but would like to hear some other opinions on the matter.

Are there any soldiers who have had similar problems with RBS which would strengthen my case?

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a soldier or a lawyer, but I would have thought that to be in the army, then you would have had to have gone through quite thorough background checks. The army surely would want to know exactly who was in its ranks. Because of this, maybe the army was able to pass on enough details to teh bank to satisfy the anti-fraud measures.

 

I would have thought getting verified by the army would be stricter than getting verified for a bank account?

 

Just my £0.02

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your twopence worth Candice. I agree with you and that is the answer the bank has given. However, why don't they apply the same rule to others whose identity is not in question?

Are you aware that long term prisoners in their last year of sentence can go to work for a regular employer, provided they have earned the privilege through good behaviour? These prisoners cannot open a bank account because they cannot provide photo evidence of their identity and have no utility bills.

Some employers will only pay staff through their bank account. Prisoners, therefore, have a limited choice of where they can work.

Surely prisoners' identity cannot be in question either and have they not been stringently checked out to find them guilty?

I feel that banks should play their part in rehabilitating these men and women who have paid their debt to society and have proved their eligibility to rejoin the general public.

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never thought of that but it's a good point. I'm not going to debate whether it's right for this to happen (giving convicted citizens automatic jobs per se) but maybe if they already had a bank account open it won't be an issue.

 

I'm either going crazy or can't find reference to the government saying that everyone in the UK should have right to a basic bank account. Lots need them for benefits also. In a way it's a shame that TSB isn't government owned any more, as that seemed to be the logical solution.

 

I wonder if one can apply for an account at the Bank of England? lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I know is that army or police id can be taken to open an account but we are not legally allowed to photocopy it.

We need some address verification too (bank statement, utility bill, driving licence, voters roll search etc etc (full list is about two pages long!) If it's not possible to provide anything like this then I suppose we could potentially have a letter from the army but this would need authorised specially by a head office dept before we opened an account.

 

I once heard a story that a new member of Sir Fred Goodwin's (chief exec of RBS) household staff did not have relevant id (she was foreign) and they had to phone Sir Freds office and politely ask for a personal reference before they were allowed to open an account!

 

If the branch you are talking about regularly opens army accounts they may have different systems in place however.

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you thegoodsamaritan. What do you think about the RBS changing account addresses without the knowledge of the account holder? This actually happens throughout the soldier's career whenever he is posted!

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to help.

I'm not quite sure what you mean though. Is it when a soldier is moved from say a base in Nottingham to a Glasgow base that the army automatically tells the bank of the change of address?

 

I've a feeling these may not be set up as regular personal accounts because of the way they sound like they're run, could you tell me what type of account they have? (Interest Paying Current Accounts or Royalties or R21 or Key are the usual accounts for personal customers)

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The bank gets a print out when a soldier is posted and the bank then changes the address without even informing the soldier. Too bad if the Army gets the address wrong!

 

These are normal bank accounts that Joe Public opens.

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I haven't heard of this before, maybe its an army branch thing and unfortunately I don't know of the legality of the army changing soldiers addresses automatically.

If the army have wrongly changed your sons address I'd say they are liable for the charges. Obviously though you could just claim them back through the systems as laid out here.

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Initialy, the bank refused to refund my son's charges but following a heated telephone conversation with the so-called Military manager, the charges were refunded in full. I think that the word Ombudsman did the trick.

 

I have six months to write to the Ombudsman and am waiting a while to let them think I have gone away. Then they will be hit by an Ombudsman investigation when they least expect it. :o

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/08/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Don't let the fatherless chillen get ya! :grin:

 

Barclays - settled in full £4799.38 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6563 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...