Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I really need some advise please.

 

Stupidly I took out a loan with Speed-e-loan.

 

The amount was for £250, due to unforeseen circumstances I lost my job around the time the loan should have been paid back £397.50 Feb/Mar 2011.

 

I was paying token payments till January when someone told me to stop, as I only owe the £397.50 and nothing more....

 

Now Speed-e-loans are chasing an astronomical amount (well it is to me) of £1090.51 including interest and charges. (three phone calls today from them despite me requesting everything in writing)

I've emailed them today stating to provided full statement and also stuck to contact in writing only

and this is what I have received from Speed-e:

Thank you for your email. Please find attached a brerakdown of your transactional log with Speedeloans.

You borrowed £250.00 capital and was due to pay back a total of £397.50 in Feb/March 2011. To date your current outstanding balance is £1090.51 (inc. Interest charges etc)

Since you took out this loan you have paid back a total of £154.50.

Therefore taking everything into consideration the best settlement offer I can accept is £704.50 (I cannot offer you anything less than this).

If you wish to split this over 2-3 monthly payments I am willing to accept this also to make it more feasible for you.

 

 

Please examine and reply in which way you feel to proceed, interest is still incurring on this account so i do urge you to respond quickly so we can find a solution to this loan and get it paid off as quickly as possible

 

I've attached what they sent in the email as well, this was supposed to be a statement of account but it shows no Account number or Account holders name - It could be anyone's

In addition to this, the interest applied doesn't seem right as there's 3x of the 6th June, 2x 14th June there is no pattern to the charges is it daily/weekly/monthly or when they feel like it?

 

Really need some help, Is my friend right that I only owe them the £250 plus one months interest? Im on JSA so my money is budgeted but I know I can pay the remaining £245 within two months. [ATTACH=CONFIG]38339[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]38338[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]38337[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit agreement ended the day you where originally due to repay, which is why they can't charge their 4000% or whatver interest anymore.

 

For the unfair charges see here http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/unfair_contract_terms/oft311.pdf relevant bit is under Section 5

 

Yep. Thats why you DEFAULT on a loan and not simply miss the repayment. If the contract was for 3 months for example, then a £300 loan can be paid £100 per month. If you miss a payment, then they have the right to charge interest.

 

However, they offer 30 day loans, upon which the contract is legally ended, you have defaulted, and are in debt with them. It's also why multiple PDL's claim a rollover fee creates a new loan with the company. It's how they TRY and get around laws that involve interest.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm a little confused.

Are you saying that I am liable for the full £1k or just the £250?

Also how can they charge multiple interests the same day?

 

I would like to write back to them and sound intelligent by quoting something that proves I should pay a penny over £X amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are only liable for the original loan plus original interest. I quoted an example which is basic how things are calculated. However PDL's only offer 30 day loans. So the interest cannot be charged as they try to charge it. They would have to agree to an initial contract of a few months to be able to do this, and in doing so, would have to abide by different rules.

 

What they are doing is trying to pretend that they are offering proper loans, like credit cards/banks do, but operate under PDL regulations, of which there are very little.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are only liable for the £250.

 

Below quote is from a different thread on this forum where someone complained to the FOS about a different PDL Company that tried to add fantasy charges:

 

Just received the judgement from fos and low and behold they have agreed with my complaint!!!!

 

They have basically said that I owe them the initial loan +1 months interest + the 1st default fee less the payments that have already been made! They also go on to say that an appropriate repayment plan should be agreed to if needed!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?343976-Response-from-Minicredit-about-FOS-complaint&p=3945846&viewfull=1#post3945846

 

Don't worry about the default fee bit, while that is theoretically correct fees can't be disproportionate, unfair or anything else as outlined in the OFT document linked earlier, so even if the FOS says a default fee would need to be paid that default fee itself still needs to meet the guidelines and comply with any and all applicable laws to actually be enforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to approach S-e-L with a repayment for the £250. My email is as follows:

Hi, I’ve reviewed the information sent with the help of the CAB and another Consumer Advice service.

Both have informed me that the only amount due is £243.00 ( £397.50 less payments of £154.50).

 

They have stated that “you (Mr XXXXXX) are only liable for the original loan (£250) plus original interest (£147.50) as Pay Day Loan's only offer 30 day loans. So the interest cannot be charged as the company are trying charge it. They would have to agree to an initial contract of a few months to be able to do this, and in doing so, would have to abide by different rules.”

 

With that said I wish to resolve this amicably.

 

Section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 is an Act of Parliament which over-rides charges/penalties being taken or applied to an account if the person is in receipt of any of the following benefits: Income Support, Tax Credits, Child Benefit, Job seekers allowance, Incapacity benefit, Disability living allowance, Attendance Allowance, CSA payments, Other DWP payments.

These social security benefits are granted to stop hardship and are designed to meet *basic day to day needs*, and are exempt and are protected under the Social Security Administration Act 1992 sub section 187. from arrestment in terms of section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (see Enforcement of Civil Obligations in Scotland, Scottish Executive report, at paragraph 5.245).

Basic day to day needs as per the DWP: food, water, shelter, sanitation, education, clothing, transportation and healthcare including personal care.

 

Due to myself receiving Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) at a rate of £71.00 per week (previously was on Employment and Support Allowance), so I would require a re-payment plan for the £243.00.

As mentioned in your email below the maximum period of time you were proposing was 3 months. At £243 this would nearly be a 3rd of the monthly rate of JSA and would put myself in further financial hardship.

 

I therefore propose the following:

Should there be any, a removal of any Default entered on to any of my credit reports (Experian / Equifax / Call Credit)

A repayment for £250 (£243.00 + £7.00 admin costs to set up this arrangement) over a period of 6 months. Commencing 28th September 2012 and further payments on or before 28th of each calendar month. (£41.67 x 6 monthly payments on or before 28th each calendar month).

 

If I am in a position to pay more than the £41.67 pcm, I will do so with no prejudice/charges/penalties or fees being applied to the account.

 

As I am hopeful of re-entering employment, I suggest that this schedule be reviewed no earlier than the 28th November, to see if I am in a position to make a final settlement on the account. Again if I am in a position to settle the account at any time, I will do so with no prejudice/charges/penalties or fees being applied to the account.

ALL PAYMENTS will be made by bank transfer to the account details used previously (Sort Code: XX-XX-XX; Account Number: XXXXXXXX with client ID XXXXXXXX)

 

Should this not be correct, or any of the details change, please inform myself in writing via email with at least 7 working day’s notice.

 

I hope that the information provided and the proposal will be acceptable. (please reply to this email with confirmation).

However should this proposal not be accepted by yourselves, I will deem the account as in query and exercise my right to approach the FSO to seek resolution.

Regards

Mr XXXX

As previously mentioned: Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone and these have been duly logged by time and date.

Each call received will be greeted with a response of “Everything in writing as previously mentioned” and then the call will be ended

 

What do you think? I was going to originally put £300 instead of £250, but thought why do I want to give them money? I think £7 is reasonable admin costs (as if there would be any).

I thought to include a bit of jargon that was given to me when I first made a claim for JSA about charges & penalties etc.. as they have been made fully aware (proof of benefits) my situation previously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Result!!!!

Just received an email from Speed-e-Loans:

Dear Mr xxxxx,

I apologise for the late reply, i have been discussing your account with management most of the morning and they have authourised me to put your agreement in place. £250 will be needed to be paid over 6 months with the first payment being made on or before 28th September of 41.67.

The bank details you hold for Speedeloans are correct so bank transfer/standing order is fine.

I hope this has helped you

Kind Regards,

Andrew Wright

 

so thats gone from the balance of £1090.51 to the minimum acceptable settlement of £704.50 to £250.00

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good one pal ;)

 

I suspect the "discussing your account with management most of the morning" is another term for we know we ain't gonna pull one over on you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice job. And radgie hit it right on the nose :)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just checked and the email didn't leave my outbox till 12:47 Today and his response was at 13:03!

 

Oh well - time to start the whole process with CashChoice (apparently I owe them £1400 from £200) and Payday Express.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it amusing how they make out they've went through thorough procedures and discussed the account in-depth to arrange a repayment plan.

 

Makes me laugh lol

 

Keep us updated on payday express ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, usually PDLs do know exactly well where they stand legally with their unfair fees, of course if one wanted the apparent lack fo procedures to follow to wipe off the fees could be used s a basis to question the procedures for approving the loan in the first place:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...