Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS and wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided?. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NDR/ Empire catalogue debt


staceygarrity9
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4238 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I purchased a cooker from my mums catalogue around 9 years ago.

About 6mths after my husband had a mental episode and was hospitalised and i had to give up work to look after him and our children.

 

As i couldn't afford the repayment each month to my mum the account was passed to me.

 

The debts started mounting up so we seen a debt specialist at the CAB office who sorted out all the debts and offered them all £1.00 each

(apparenlty we had to offer all debt companies the same amount).

 

Empire catalogue accepted the £1.00(shop diect) payment and everything was fine.

 

Then the debt was passed to droyds debt and collections services who accepted the £1.00 payments.

 

The on the 14th july 2008 i receieved a letter from NDR saying that they had took over the account and to keep on paying the amount offered of £1.00.

 

On the 21st march 2009 i received a letter telling me they were adding on £12.00 as payment not receievd

even though it has always been paid by standing order every 28 days and that they require the full amount - does state on letter £1.00 received.

This was the start of my problems with them.

 

I sent them a letter stating that they had accepted the £1.00 offer, and a copy of the letter,

to which they responded that that was now out of date and they now require £40.00 per month.

 

I wrote to them explaining my situation which now included the fact that i couldn't work as our son was diagnosed with a life threatening illness

so i have become his fulltime carer and included income/expenditure form.

 

I received a letter telling me that they were not going to accept the £1.00 but would hold interest on the account for 6mths, if i paid the £40.00 per month.

 

Since then they keep on adding £12.00 to the account which now stands at £800

- all the other debt have now come off my credit file and most were paid off when we had to sell the house 8 years ago, but it was the large debts we paid off.

 

NDR will not accept my £1.00 offer, nor will they accept a settlement arrangement,

as i asked them if i could settle the amount for a lower figure and they have turned me down.

 

This debt is still on my credit file as they never defaulted the debt but shows up late payment each month.

 

I did send them a letter asking for copy of my credit agreement which they sent me a blank credit agreement, but this was back in 2011.

 

I have had phone calls to them to try to lower the amount since and letters but they always turn it down, lowest amount they will take is £39.00.

 

I haven't had time to deal with this debt until now due to personal reasons beyond my control

but now i want to try to resolve the matter but i am getting nowhere with NDR,

told by them to speak to a debt advisor and get letter off them saying i can only afford £1.00per month,

which i did last week and three companies weren't interested due to the amount owed only being small.

 

 

Any help will be much appreciated.

stacey

Link to post
Share on other sites

NDR are a well known [edit] dca. Never pay any of their charges, and never EVER contact them by phone. Only contact them by recorded delivery letter or email.

 

Again, dont worry about their charges, they are trying to unjustly enrich themselves, and are bordering on the criminal activity of obtaining money by deception.

 

Your next step should be to keep paying the £1 a month as they cannot refuse to accept it, and then enter a full complaint with both the DCA and the OFT who are the regulators. If you dont get a final response from the DCA in 8 weeks, you can escalate it to the FOS.

 

One thing to note is that you might get discount letters from them in the near future. If you do, then its assured that the debt is bad.

 

If you have any letters from them, could you post them up here minus any personal info or reference numbers? If they have added charges and amounts unlawfully, its a very simply matter to get them removed.

 

Again, stop worrying and ignore these chancers, and NEVER talk to them on the phone. If they call you, just say "in writing only please" and hang up. Overtalk them if you have to.

 

Also, can i ask if youve had any letters saying that they have bought the debt? Or are they acting on behalf of another DCA? Is anyone else chasing you for the debt at the same time as this outfit?

Edited by dx100uk
please do not bypass our word filter -dx

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, noone else is chasing me for the money only them.

The letters i receive are monthly statements from them with a letter attached which states : Notice of default sum, £12.00 charge for insufficient minimum payment.

Letters telling me to contact them regarding future repayments and an amount they want me to pay, between £39.00 and £40.00 on all letters.

Other letters are reguarding credit agreement which i am scanning to computer at the moment.

Edited by staceygarrity9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Those £12 charges are classed as penalty fees, and are unenforceable.

 

As i said earlier, just keep paying the £1 a month and keep all communication between you and them. Should they even attempt to take you to court, a defence about this debt is a very easy one to submit. However, it's very doubtful they will go anywhere near it as they wouldnt want the court to see that they have added on unlawful fees purely to make a "quick buck".

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please use paint and edit your letters. Names and account numbers can be seen when zooming in.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear curs

 

I am in receipt of your recent correspondence dated (XXXX)

 

It seems apparent from your correspondence and despite me making my payments ON TIME every 28days via standing order, that you are deliberately manipulating and deceiving me into paying your charges (which I totally dispute). Your letter makes it quite clear that they are a penalty.

 

You will be fully aware of the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 which are tied in with your own 'governing' body's 'code of conduct' I am sure I do not have to remind you of either that code or the Office Of Fair Trading's guidance on debt collection.

 

In order to gain a credit licence you should have a complaints procedure, I now require you to forward this to me. If you do not do this within 7 days, then apart from informing the Office Of Fair Trading, I will open up a case with the Financial Ombudsman Service who will charge you £450 just to investigate my complaint. I will also pass this on to my local MP.

 

I expect a response with your official complaints procedure within 7 days.

 

I trust this makes my position completely clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes time to get reclaiming!!

 

i've mved this thread to the mail order forum

 

plenty of like threads here to read.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...