Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Complex Debt Situation


DennisTheDog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Dennis looking in as you requested.

 

SAR: Yes PO is fine, mark it clearly on the back and front '' FOR STATUTORY FEE ONLY''.

 

Take note also a SAR most probably not produce an agreement, the ICO says that ''although we might expect the agreement to be supplied there is actually no obligation for the creditor to do so, section 77/78 of CCA 1974 deals with this.

 

The SAR is addressd to the Creditors DATA CONTROLLER at their head office, PO payable to the creditor trading stlyle.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Dennis looking in as you requested.

 

SAR: Yes PO is fine, mark it clearly on the back and front '' FOR STATUTORY FEE ONLY''.

 

Take note also a SAR most probably not produce an agreement, the ICO says that ''although we might expect the agreement to be supplied there is actually no obligation for the creditor to do so, section 77/78 of CCA 1974 deals with this.

The SAR is addressd to the Creditors DATA CONTROLLER at their head office, PO payable to the creditor trading stlyle.

 

Wow this is starting to confuse me now. Really sorry for being obtuse, but if they don't have to provide a CCA I don't understand the ability to ask them for one. Plus one of my agreements is prior to 1985 - the Lloyds TSB credit card, whicj was an access card which was changed over to a mastercard then to a visa then back to a mastercard.

 

SAR's cost £10 each, not much I know, but at the moment I am counting pennies from my JSA so I will have to do this 1 at a time.

 

Thanks for all the help everyone but my head is spinning at the moment, I thiink I will have to lie down!:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be confusing CCA 1974 deals with the production of regulated agreements the DPA deals with the production of ''personal'' data, it was postulated some years ago that

the regulated agreements were not pd as a copy is provided at the inception of the agreement, so custom and practice applies and most creditors will not supply an agreement with aSAR.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be confusing CCA 1974 deals with the production of regulated agreements the DPA deals with the production of ''personal'' data, it was postulated some years ago that

the regulated agreements were not pd as a copy is provided at the inception of the agreement, so custom and practice applies and most creditors will not supply an agreement with aSAR.

 

If I were to ask for a CCA what would be the consequences for the Creditor if they could not produce one? Essentially it does not make any difference in the UK?

 

I am still trying to get my head round this - the medication does not help:lol: - but at the moment I have not had any letters from any of them except MBNA, even though I ended the DMP a month ago. It all seems very quiet, what could they be up to?

 

I tried to get my credit record through wobble, but it seemed not to accept my coop visa card for some unknown reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little really apart from the fact that they cannot enforce the debt in court..

Try Equifax or Experian they have 30 day free trials.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes from Lloyds TSB, under a debt collection company called NHA - who have even written to me saying they may send a representative to my address - I got one this morning I recognise the number - I don't even answer the phone anymore.

 

MHA are loyds internal 'debt collectors'. after a couple of letters from them, loyds' BLS Collections will be next on scene, also internal (both not really dca's as such just different headed template letters from within loyds collections dept). after that would prob go to an external DCA (the likes of westlot, robbing way, lesscroft, etc), either sold on or on instruction.

 

when/if writing to them, instruct them communication in writing only.

 

ps re sar re agreement. an agreement/application form would obviously be personal data as defined as it would be clearly identifiable by name/address just as a bank statement which the ico regard as personal data. thing is, there is a statutory right under the consumer credit act to supply a copy agreement (or accurate recon) the failure of which has more significance then that under the data prot act. hence why ico sees the ccact as more appropriate re that. irony is, that under a cca request a reconstruction as defined can be supplied whereas under a sar it would have to be the actual copy agreement (if there is one, and they can find it!). so, best bet do both. and if a cred doesn't send one under a sar, don't rely on that re unenforcement.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Little really apart from the fact that they cannot enforce the debt in court..

Try Equifax or Experian they have 30 day free trials.

 

Not having any luck with these either. Its to do with the name of the house. My debit card says one name - as on my rental agreement and the post office say another

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing to do is notify all creditor you are dealing with your bank and the CRAs of the postal address as set ou in the Royal Mail Posr Code Directory.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

yea dont panic

 

it shows they cant get you to pay

so haave given up

 

here you try!!

 

i thought it had already been sold to varde?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea dont panic

 

it shows they cant get you to pay

so haave given up

 

here you try!!

 

i thought it had already been sold to varde?

 

dx

 

So they said originally but they gave no address, but then after weeks they did nothing, so I sent them a recorded delivery letter asking to which account number I should pay a token amount to. They replied with this company plus their address and telephone number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you recheck your cra file to see what it says now?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week I made a token payment to my Lloyds TSB credit card, stating that I would review the amount last month. In response this week I got a letter from SCM threatening immediate court action if I did not pay the full £16 K. I've told them my situation and that I have no assets. Isn't this unfair practice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not in their eyes, you need to restate your situation which I would doubt SCM have seen.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter from Apex Credit management, I have no idea who they are - has anyone heard of them below is the contents.

 

"Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the above account, the contents of which have been

duly noted.

In order for Apex Credit Management Ltd to accept your ofier of repayment, we will require an up to date

financial statement from you. This statement should include full details of your income, expenditure and

other creditors.

Please contact the office on 0845 849 8920 with the above details so we may confirm your offer and

prevent any further recovery action. Our office opening hours are listed below:

Monday - Thursday 8.00am - 8.O0pm

Friday 8.00am - 5.00pm

Saturday 9.00am - 2.00pm

Yours sincerely,

Administration Department"

 

I have made no offer to these people, I made a token offer to LloydsTSB about two weeks ago on an overdraft balance. I paid the token amount but the transfer was rejected. LloydsTSB did not respond to my recorded delivery letter - below

 

"

Lloyds TSB

Lloyds TSB Bank

PO Box 487

 

Re – Overdue amounts

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

From your records, you will see that we have been in financial difficulties, as a sign of good faith I wish to make a token payment of £3.19 to be reviewed monthly. To this end, I would be grateful if you could send the following details to me by post as soon as possible so that I can set up payments.

 

Account name

Account number

Bank name

Bank Sort Code

 

Furthermore I would be grateful if future communications were in writing only.

"

 

I am not sure I should reply to these people, they have not produced any legal documentation and I certainly made them no offer, I made it to LloydsTSB.

 

Can any one advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

that a std phishing letter they send out to try and spoof you

 

ignore

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is Lloyds have farmed this out to Apex and passed on your offer, all wrong if you have not had Notice of Assignment (NOA) from Apex and or Lloysd.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is Lloyds have farmed this out to Apex and passed on your offer, all wrong if you have not had Notice of Assignment (NOA) from Apex and or Lloysd.

 

Not only have they not informed me, they did not respond to my letter at all. On top of which the overdraft was on a joint account and my name only appears on this letter from Apex.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...