Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How bad is the work programme?


reallymadwoman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Unbelievably, I posted this thread nearly 2 years ago :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?284285-No-experience-no-job-no-experience.

 

Unfortunately, despite taking and using all the advice given my poor daughter still doesn't have a job and we're getting desperate enough to ask JCP for help. Apparently, as a carer (she gets carer's allowance and IS) she could volunteer for the work programme. However, having read some horror stories we're very wary.

 

For example, if she volunteers to join, is it then compulsory? Could they sanction her benefits if she couldn't turn up because she's in A & E with me or if she refused a course because it was too many hours? Even if they technically can't do that, how likely are Work Programme advisors to have any experience of dealing with carers? Are they going to just push her into caring jobs because that's the easiest option?

 

Does anyone know of any more guidance about support for carers other than the standard DWP leaflet? Or have any other suggestions at all?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Volunteer for the Work Programme? Lunacy IMHO, you have read the threads, how many positive stories are there?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feels like a lifetime ago now, but the year they brought in New Deal (remember that?), my OH was on incapacity benefit following an RTA. Being 23 at the time, he decided that he didn't fancy a lifetime on benefits and got his consultant to sign him off as fit and then volunteered for New Deal, despite not having been unemployed for 6 months. He wanted to train to be a landscape gardener - he spent 6 weeks on an advanced Microsoft user course and one day building a replica iron age round house. He was then forced to take the first job that came along from a New Deal employer under threat of benefit sanctions. The job in question was as an "apprentice engineer" (read: bucket carrier), he ended up working in excess of 60 hours a week for what worked out at £4 an hour, and that's when he actually got paid. The company went bust after 8 months, owing us a fortune and having helpfully paved the way for an almost lifetime cycle of debt. Despite the fact the company was glaringly obviously in massive financial trouble and dragging us down with them, the JC insisted that if he quit, they'd sanction our benefits.

 

Looking round this forum, nothing's changed - I'd say only do anything that might involve sanctions if they drag you in kicking and screaming.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we're all agreed the work programme is a no then?

 

Any positive suggestions other than carry on doing what we're doing - volunteering and applying for anything that seems remotely suitable.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would not advise volunteering to attend the WProg, it may voluntary to go along but once you have volunteered and attend the voluntary meeting you become mandated to continue to attend with them.

 

All the providers will be looking at with your daughter is the rather larger than normal "bonus" payment they receive if they help her to move away from IS and Carers Allowance to take up employment. They appear on most levels to inadequate to help the long term unemployed let allone someone is considered more vunerable due to their home circumstances and caring requirements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I volunteered to go on the New Deal for the disabled with A4e when it started. It was a complete waste of time, the venue was completely inappropriate for any one with physical disabilities. The staff had little idea about disabilities and seemed to think exersize was the cure for all disabilities. To top it off i was told that the HE diploma I had taken years to achieve was worthless. They effectively removed all thoughts of me ever getting back to work.

 

I am now on ESA SG, don't think I'll bother again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Daughter would have absolutely NO benefit from the Work Programme, the opposite in fact.

 

And even when you "volunteer" for it, once you volunteer, it then becomes mandatory iirc.

 

It is seriously not worth getting involved with, remotely.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems we're pretty much on our own then. If she was a couple of years younger, 'Young Carers' might provide some help but otherwise there's nothing locally. Not even help with travel costs and fees to do a course or something, not that I think that would help much.

 

Back to the bank of Mum and Dad then!

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we're all agreed the work programme is a no then?

 

Any positive suggestions other than carry on doing what we're doing - volunteering and applying for anything that seems remotely suitable.

 

My only advice is not join phoney volunteering projects but keep on applying for jobs. Don't lose sleep over it. There's not much work around, but the only option is to keep on applying and hope that some other applicants give up before your daughter does. It's bit like joing a very long queue, eventually someone in the middle will give up and the queue will get shorter.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pimps are just car parks for claimants, they have no access to any special 'secret' job lists, they use the same resources as anyone else. IMO it's more likely that a claimant would come out the other end of a two year stint with the pimps less equipped for the job market than when they started.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Voluntary work in local charities can lead to permanent positions and training. Local youth centes are alays looking for young volunteers, and their hours are ussually very flexible week by week. If the local council is involved with the facility this opens the door to free places on council youth training courses which are for a few hours or days at a time. This can eventually lead to paid placement work in the facility with the council. Not sure how old your daughter is but council youth facilities often run job clubs and access to training and benefits for up to age 25.

 

Imagine it would be the same with some other voluntary organisations. Your local volunteer centre could probably advise you further on this. Our local Volunteer ADvice Centre asks companies who advertise in them , if the work is paid, expenses are met and what sort of support and training will be offered to a potential volunteer. And they also usually have some knowledge on effect on benefits for volunteers as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would not advise volunteering to attend the WProg, it may voluntary to go along but once you have volunteered and attend the voluntary meeting you become mandated to continue to attend with them.

 

Have they recently change the participation groups?

 

The last time I checked the "Work Programme Provider guide" (chapter 2) it stated that those on IS or where a "full time carer" are placed in the "Voluntary Participation group" along with those on "ESA support", if they volunteered to enter the work programme.

 

Those on ( for example) ESA WRAG or JSA, if they volunteer to enter WP, then yes, they then become mandated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...