Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Goods under warranty and over 12 months old


peterhw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4202 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just read a thread detailed here about Samsung TV () can not post link) that has broken down. I have contacted bob.darke at comet.co.uk - as suggested and await a response

 

My situtation is more a matter of principal rather than the cost. I purchased a set of Wahl Hair cordless clippers in July 2011 from Comet @ £17.99. The clippers packed up in August 2012. I am the only user of the clippers and hence have only been used say 13 times in 13 months (my 'lack of hair' puts very little effort on the clippers!).

 

Comet have replied 2 or 3 times with a 'not their problem'. Wahl have said they will honour the warranty but I should package the goods correctly, send recorded delivery etc. (all cost). I have, now purchased a corded set of clippers (£9.99) but would like Comet to meet, (as I understand under SOGA) their responsibilities, and replace these goods.

 

If Comet (or other retailers) refuse to honour a 3 year manufacturer warranty on low cost items then surely the warranty is almost useless

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit of confusion here, I think. A direct manufacturer's warranty should be taken up directly with the manufacturer - and unless there is something specific in Comet's T&Cs, that they will deal on behalf of the manufacturer, then I think that Comet are probably right.

 

On the other hand, it may well be that you have some rights under SOGA. You are entitled to have the use of the clippers for a reasonable time. What is reasonable for such a low-value item - normally, not very long.

However Wahl clearly consider that the clippers should last you at least 3 years - because if not they would not guarantee them in the way that they do. I think that you have a very good argument to make to a court that you can reasonably expect the clippers to last 3 years.

Wahl are a very excellent make - the best on the market. I would have said that it would be worth taking up Wahl on ttheir warranty and going against Comet for the costs of doing so.

You would need to write to Comet to let them know what you intended to do and to give them an opportunity to honour their SOGA obligations before you take further action.

If you are interested in principle, that that is the solution.

 

Frankly people should steer clear of Comet. They seem to have a very poor consumer rights record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I accept confusion!

Many thanks for your reply and I think you answered my query in appropriate way.

Obviously one does not buy hair clippers as if they were a consumable.

One would expect clippers to last 3 - 5 years or more and then the rechargeable battery would probably have given up before the clippers themselves.

 

I will see also what bob.clarke (or his office) has to say.

 

My final point however was perhaps a question about the law - i.e. if manufacturers make a product with a 3 year warranty then there should be a 'simple' legal way of having that implemented - otherwise the warranty is all but useless. Perhaps Wahl should consider whether to sell via a retailer who appears somewhat hostile to 'customer service'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi peter ,

 

This is an interesting question you have raised here .

 

The product you purchased from the Retailer came with a 3 Year Manufacturers Warranty albeit this is a low cost product the same principle should be applied by the Retailer regarding honouring the Warranty included with the product .

 

Had the Warranty been 1 Year I could understand COMET`s take on this but in this case the Product which COMET sold has a 3 year Warranty .

 

They being the selller surely have to take ownership of the faulty goods in this instance and at the very least should offer an exchange product

 

Another Grey area here but another instance where COMET are passing the buck it would seem .

 

Further Information can be found here ,

 

http://whatconsumer.co.uk/is-the-guarantee-worth-the-paper-it%E2%80%99s-written-on/

 

The important paragraph being ,

 

" Furthermore, you should never be referred back to the manufacturer at any point. Your first and only port of call in the event of a claim is always the seller "

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

received the following reply from Comet on 13th September (by email)

Dear Mr X

 

Thank you for you e-mail, I was sorry to read that your hair clippers have failed after 13 months of use.

 

As you have advised the manufacturer Wahl have a 3 year guarantee. If you require a repair or replacement after the initial 12 months you will need to return the clippers to the manufacturer.

 

We would be unable to refund you the postage as the product is a low value product and we no longer stock this item.

 

I appreciate this is not the response you anticipated, however I trust this clarifies Comets position on the matter.

Yours Sincerely

[.. removed name..]

On Behaf of the Directors Office

==================================================================

 

This appears to be in complete contradiction of SOGA. This is a low cost item (I have replaced with corded clippers). I'd still like pursue if the process does cost loads of cash! Previous CAG suggests writing to Comet and advising that I will pursue for costs. It seems they have categorically stated that they will do nothing (i.e. replace , repair , pay any costs etc. No longer stock product)

 

Any suggestions?

Edited by peterhw
add reference to earlier CAG reply
Link to post
Share on other sites

Last Response from Comet. I suspect my argument is that I should have reasonable expectation that a pair of hair clippers , with 3 year manufacterers warranty should survive - at most - 13 very light uses

 

Dear Mr Williams

 

Thank you for your e-mail

 

I note your comments on SOGA please let me clarify.

 

The 6 year protection that you refer to is not a warranty on a product.

 

Under 6 year obligation,customers have up to 6 years to bring issues to court.

However it does not mean goods have to last up to 6 years and neither does it mean that we will repair free of charge up to 6 years.

 

This claim is for customer to prove that the product does not conform to contract, which in our terms means there is a manufacturers defect with the product.

 

If a product becomes faulty outside of the guarantee period,the customer must provide proof that the fault was apparent at time of purchase.

 

In closing, please accept my sincere apologies for any inconvenience caused, however I am unable to assist you further in this matter.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

[name removed]

 

On Behalf of the Directors Office

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi peter ,

 

Strange how they do not mention that the Product they sold you came with a 3 year Guarantee so therefore what has 12 Months got to do with anything as in their previous response .

 

If a product becomes faulty outside of the guarantee period,the customer must provide proof that the fault was apparent at time of purchase.

 

So why are they even mentioning this also ? as this statement does not apply in this case .

 

As in my previous link

 

http://whatconsumer.co.uk/is-the-gua...9s-written-on/

 

The Manufacturer has nothing to do with it as the Retailer that sold the product is ultimately responsible , even if they take responsibility by returning the faulty goods back for repair at their expense , which is the very least they should do .

 

As usual it would seem they are washing their hands of an issue, on a point of principal it is worth pursuing.

 

Also what has the statement " low cost product " got do do with it either ? .

Edited by GorgieBoy

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Comet continued to do nothing except refer me again to Wahl. I contacted Wahl and they gave me a link / information to print out a postage paid label for return to Wahl.

 

The goods were returned to Wahl and quickly replaced.

Job done !

Thanks to Wahl.

I realise it was their product but it was Comet who sold me the product. I notice Wahl no longer supplies Comet (as stated by Comet).

 

Points to Wahl 10 v Points to Comet 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...