Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing Benefit and Income Support Overpayment - due in Court next week


hine moa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

s111A is an either way dishonesty charge so could be heard at Magiistrates or Crown. So if you wanted you could insist on a Crown Court Trial & deny dishonest intentions. When an overpayment is over £25,000 then the magistates have to refer the case to Crown for sentencing. As your intention appears to be pleading Guilty at the earliest opportunity it should stay at Magistrates. However it is unlikely to be done & dusted in a day. The court will usually request a probation report to consider your suitablility for community work - so expect to be bailed for a fast delivery probation report & then return for sentencing. The magistrates will reduce the sentence by 1/3 for an early guilty plea.

 

Thank you sunny jim, I've got a 15 month old son, two other children of 10 and 15 (one has aspergers) my doctor currently thinks I am unfit for work. Do they expect someone with a young child to do community work, I can't afford child care, surely they don't pay for it!

If I don't get the community work what else is there?

I've not spoken to my solicitor, seems I get a half hour before the appointment on the day. I admitted being guilty at my interview, but not knowingly so at the time. I didn't withhold information thinking oh goody I get all this money, I just got into a mess which I still am in, where I am not dealing with life at all. Things were said to me that I don't recall at all, they obviously have records of all this so I am in black and white guilty as hell.

Kind of just wish I could walk away from it all, leave it all behind

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you? Our council wont give us a copy until they have decided the next course of action. I couldn't ask for it straight away at the time.

 

When I got the court papers there was a copy of the Interview under Caution all typed up.

I know you can get a copy at some point after the interview, not sure how long you have to wait before you can apply for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you should be given a form detailing how you can obtain a copy of the IUC on whatever media it was recorded on, ie tape or disk. You would be unlikely to be given a transcribed copy - lucky if you are though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a two year conditional discharge. The debt is already being collected from my benefits at source, there were no further fines and the magistrate told the prosecution they had to cover the costs in this case. Magistrate was horrified that I am still living in fear of ex husband after seven years and along with other things that have happened in the last seven years is not at all surprised that I appeared to have some form of breakdown in 2007 when I stopped dealing with things.

Just relieved it's all over, my solicitor was brilliant, feeling emotionally drained and have a headache that won't go away. I guess it will after some proper food and some sleep tonight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant news. That headache will go once your head registers that you don't need to be so stressed & on tenderhooks constantly. It's a heck of an ordeal you have been through, no doubt about that.

Time to come back down to planet earth. Glad you updated x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the ins and outs, but my impression is that this will show up on an enhanced disclosure check (or whatever it is called these days), even when spent. So, you will have to declare this on applications until it is spent, but if you plan on working in a situation where you are working with vulnerable people etc, it will show up.

 

That being said, I have read posts on here with people being upfront with their employers about benefit fraud court visits, and their employers still offering them a job/allowing them to stay in a job. I would not assume that this automatically decreases your employment prospects.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you everyone.

 

Still feeling like utter crap and there's a good chance it could be in the local paper tomorrow :-(

 

 

I was aware that they were taking money from my housing benefit well before the situation got to court. They've been deducting £10 per week. I have had a letter today stating that:

 

There will be an ongoing deduction of £17.75 against the invoices listed below.

The deductions will be from your normal payments starting with your payment due on or around 15th October 2012 until the overpayment is recovered.

Invoice - £181.70

Invoice - £1039.39

THIS IS BECAUSE YOU WERE SUCCESSFULLY PROSECUTED FOR BENEFIT FRAUD ON 28.09.12

 

I'm already struggling to top up the £100 a month now for the rent with them just deducting the £10 per week!

I fail to see why they can suddenly up the payments because of a prosecution, it's not like I haven't been paying it back already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed it's not in the paper, it's quite random when reporters turn up, do you remember seeing any there at the time? Sometimes they're easy to spot.

 

It's in there, apparently they don't go to the court but they just ring up and get a round up of all that happened. So far we'd kept this from my elderly Mum, I've spent the morning on the phone to her telling her what happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in there, apparently they don't go to the court but they just ring up and get a round up of all that happened. So far we'd kept this from my elderly Mum, I've spent the morning on the phone to her telling her what happened.

 

Oh no, so sorry to hear that, why do they have to put names! There really should be circumstances where they aren't allowed to do that in my opinion..

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's in there, apparently they don't go to the court but they just ring up and get a round up of all that happened. So far we'd kept this from my elderly mum, i've spent the morning on the phone to her telling her what happened.

 

was it ur local papaer - or the metro??

 

Did anyone recognise and ask you about it?

 

At least it was in the paper just 1 day. Its all over now.

 

Well done

Link to post
Share on other sites

was it ur local papaer - or the metro??

 

Did anyone recognise and ask you about it?

 

At least it was in the paper just 1 day. Its all over now.

 

Well done

 

A local paper that comes out once a week, not been out much to see anyone yet, got all three kids poorly with a stomach bug.

Chances are not many read it, but on the flip side, chances are many more read it than I realise, who knows hey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im so glad its all over for you , im still to face the fires. God is my only strength and ofcourse the kind people on here.

 

did they put in detailed information -like the personal problems u had that had you end up in that situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

im so glad its all over for you , im still to face the fires. God is my only strength and ofcourse the kind people on here.

 

did they put in detailed information -like the personal problems u had that had you end up in that situation?

 

In the court yes,the solicitor can only say what information you give obviously. I find the whole situation so difficult to portray without being in floods of tears, so I sat and wrote seven pages for her to read, she did so, clarified points of it and then picked out what to use in court. It was harrowing to sit and listen to the facts I had told her, like re-living a bad nightmare for me.

She gave in-depth detail on me being dumped by the roadside at 31 weeks pregnant, the outcome of which was eclampsia one week later and an emergency ceasarian to save the baby, both of us were seriously ill. She went through the years of our marriage pointing out things that happened, how he verbally and emotionally abused me for years. When I plucked up the courage to leave this man and divorce him I thought that was it. She outlined all the times he's been to social services to report me, all the times he's verbally attacked me, his children and members of my family since the divorce. It's this continued harassment of me and me not dealing with how I was feeling that's got me in this mess. Two years after the divorce I had a breakdown and part of me switched off, he still is trying to control and abuse from beyond divorce now and this seemed to anger the magistrate along with the fact I am still physically scared of him.

 

 

Are you waiting to go to Court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays newspapers are tomorrows chip papers..so what if people see it?,,you lived it and you survived when you thought all hope was lost.And everyone has skeletons in their cupboard,yours just happen to have escaped..Take no notice of other peoples opinion hun,concentrate on yourself and your family.

Lillibelle

 

I only know what I know cos I know it,I only give advice,I'm not legally trained nor do I pretend to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes on 25th.

 

how long did the whole thing take? e.g 1 hour?

 

how many people where in the room at the time?

 

did they put all that personal information of your abuse and troubles with ex in the paper?

 

My case was scheduled for 11.30, and I was told to be at Court for 10am to see my solicitor. I turned up on time and then the court failed to notify my solicitor I was there, it was all a bit messy at first! Then the solicitor saw me in a side room, she checked up on all the facts and prepared the defence. She said that the courts were running early and wanted to see us as soon as possible. At a guess the whole thing of speaking to my solicitor and then immediately being called into the Courtroom with the hearing took about an hour in total.

I don't know how the system works really, they seem to have several people in one court room on charges at a time. The list I saw on the wall for my room stated that at 10.45, 10 people were up before the magistrates, then at my time of 11.30 there were two names, mine and another chap.

On the morning when I saw my solicitor she explained that my charge had been changed anyway from a 111(1a) to a 112, which meant little to me the state I was in, I think she mentioned the words 'down graded' but I'm not sure. I'm not sure if they bunch people altogether on the same charge or not, but be prepared to have to sit through other peoples. Luckily for me I was first up and the other guy had to sit through mine.

Once I went into the court room I was told to enter the door to go into the dock, a glass room, so be prepared to feel like a really dangerous criminal. The door was locked and I couldn't get in!! I wasn't sure at this point whether to laugh or cry! Anyway the magistrate told me to stay where I was and then when they'd finished the first part of the proceedings I was allowed to sit in front the dock.

The prosecution put forward their ramblings, there were three of them so be prepared for that too, although only one spoke.

Then my solicitor put forward the defence. I pleaded guilty from the outset, even back in the IUC, I pleaded that I accepted that I had received an over payment but I hadn't done it deliberately, ie I didn't intentionally set out to receive more benefits than I should have it was illness that caused me to become unable to cope with day to day life.

Once my solicitor had thoroughly outlined all that happened to me the three magistrates shuffled lots of bits of paper around holding them up to one another and nodding and then they passed sentence.

 

I don't mean to upset you with any of the above, just to forewarn you of what happens, forewarned is forearmed and all that! I had no clue what to expect on the day at all. When the guy that was after me came into the courtroom we were already started and I spotted him coming in with a lady who was probably his wife but I went into an almost melt down thinking it was the press lol

 

And no, not all the details were in the paper, just the amount overpaid and the outcome.

Hope I've not worried you any further, I'd hate to do that, I remember well the awful impending doom in the weeks before hand, it's hell and I'd not wish it on anyone. Be strong, hugs and good luck to you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...