Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify then, should the reason I am disputing the debt be that they have not supplied all the relevant paperwork (CCA) and the debt is therefore unenforcable?
    • https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406231-the-pre-action-protocol-for-debt-claims-is-made-by-the-master-of-the-rolls-as-head-of-civil-justice-1st-oct-2017/#comment-5145126  
    • Quick update. I've now recieved a letter before action from them with a PAP form to return enclosed, still no credit agreement however. I assume just a case of following the PAP thread and returning form with no CCA as the reason?
    • Thanks for coming back and letting us know. Obviously we totally disagree with their decision.  Their remortgaging could only have gone wrong if they had ended up with a CCJ.  And how do you get a CCJ?  If you lose in court and then defy the court and don't pay.  Even if you lose in court, you don't get a CCJ as long as you pay within the 30 days ordered by the court.  Even had they lost in court the judge would have disallowed the interest and the £70 Unicorn Food Tax that PE made up.  There was no advantage whatsoever for giving in and paying now. But thanks to you for letting us know - a hell of a lot of users don't.
    • Hi everyone.   Before I say anything, TFL finally responded to the email I sent last week:   Thank you for your email, we acknowledge the signed documents you have returned in preparation for your hearing.   We note that this matter is causing you some stress and anxiety, however this is not a reason for TfL to discontinue proceedings. It is not unusual for passengers that have been summonsed to court to experience these symptoms, and we do have some empathy with your concerns.   However, as previously stated, TfL do not accept out of court settlements, and you will have the opportunity at your hearing, to provide your mitigation to the court prior to a decision being reached by them on how they intend to deal with this matter (usually a fine).   I am sorry that this decision is not more favourable.   Yours sincerely   James Vallis     At least he sounds more sympathetic in this email…   Only one week to go until the court hearing and I am so so nervous. I’ve prepared some questions and answers in preparation for what to say to the magistrate. It will help calm me down if I know roughly what to expect. If you could give feedback on it that would be great. If you have anything to add please do let me know.   As far as I know the court hearing will happen in these stages: Introduction and statement of facts Pleading guilty for the journeys I made with my mother’s card Penalty sentencing Appeal (if charged with a criminal record)   Am I guilty? Yes.   Why did I not pay the fare legally? Last year there was a lot going on in my life and I was struggling financially so to relieve some of this I used my mother’s Oyster card. I know it’s not an excuse and it’s still wrong.   Why do I not accept a criminal record? I really don’t want it to affect my chances of finding a job in the future. I will be the one earning money in my family so I am doing my best and studying hard to be able to get a good job. A criminal record would mean that regardless of how hard I’m working I won’t get the job I want after I graduate. This fills me with so much regret, sadness and disappointment in myself. I just want to be a good daughter for my mother because she’s already had to deal with many hardships in her life and I don’t want to make it any harder for her.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scotcall Doorstep Letter***RESULT***


undernie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Back again for more advice from you great people.

 

Have had a letter from ScotCall this morning threatening doorstep visit for an old SB Debt which they are trying to collect on behalf of Activ Capital.

 

Just a bit of history: Aktiv Capital have been passing around an old debt for sometime now, via Equidebt, Buchanan Clark and Wells etc. The ususal. Threatening letters from both which I ignored, then letters offering substantial discounts etc. I ignored all, and they disappeared. I always waited to see what they were going to do next before actually doing anything and because they all disappeared I didn't bother.

 

I knew it would only be a matter of time before they passed it on to another, which obviously, is now ScotCall. Never had a doorstep threat-o-gram before though so thought I would re-post.

 

This debt they are chasing would have officially become SB in 2007. I am a member of all the main credit reference agencies, Equifax, Experian and Call Credit. The debt is not showing on any of my files and I can see that my files were refreshed in 2007. I have never acknowledged the debt in any way since 2001 so I know it is definitely be SB.

 

For ScotCall though, should I send off one of Brig's simple SB letters or the full one? And should I include a doorstep related letter in the same envelope? Or should I just continue to ignore? Don't really want the neighbours knowing about all of this if they are going to call round. I've read that sometimes they will ask your neighbours about you?

 

Thanks in advance as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Back again for more advice from you great people.

 

Have had a letter from ScotCall this morning threatening doorstep visit for an old SB Debt which they are trying to collect on behalf of Activ Capital.

 

Just a bit of history: Aktiv Capital have been passing around an old debt for sometime now, via Equidebt, Buchanan Clark and Wells etc. The ususal. Threatening letters from both which I ignored, then letters offering substantial discounts etc. I ignored all, and they disappeared. I always waited to see what they were going to do next before actually doing anything and because they all disappeared I didn't bother.

 

I knew it would only be a matter of time before they passed it on to another, which obviously, is now ScotCall. Never had a doorstep threat-o-gram before though so thought I would re-post.

 

This debt they are chasing would have officially become SB in 2007. I am a member of all the main credit reference agencies, Equifax, Experian and Call Credit. The debt is not showing on any of my files and I can see that my files were refreshed in 2007. I have never acknowledged the debt in any way since 2001 so I know it is definitely be SB.

 

For ScotCall though, should I send off one of Brig's simple SB letters or the full one? And should I include a doorstep related letter in the same envelope? Or should I just continue to ignore? Don't really want the neighbours knowing about all of this if they are going to call round. I've read that sometimes they will ask your neighbours about you?

 

Thanks in advance as always.

 

You could send then in the first instance a formal letter withdrawing the right of access to your door..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies people:-). Is it the doorstep letter you are referring to? And should I send the SB letter with it in the same envelope? Or better still make it part of the same letter?

Edited by undernie
Link to post
Share on other sites

No reason why not.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed them

 

Before reporting you to the OFT thought i'd give you the chance to explain why you are sending out threatening letters regarding an alleged debt that your fellow bottom feeders in kilmarnock were advised is statute barred in may 2011

your response is eagerly awaited

good Afternoon

Thanks for attached, this account was passed to ourselves by our client CABOT FINANCIAL , in view of the content we will return this account to them noting your comments and you should hear no more from ScotCall concerning this account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the email just in-case anything surfaces in the future.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is though, that I haven't actually written to any of them before pointing out the statute barred status. Can I do this via e-mail then instead of post? i.e. just type out in an e-mail the letter I would have posted to them? I was under the impression you have to do it in writing by post and send it recorded delivery for proof it was received?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do, but make sure it is CC'd to your email address or another one, so the headers prove that it was sent, should the DCA try to say otherwise.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you send an email, there will normally be another box near the place you put the recipients address, that says CC address. CC means carbon copy. Some email providers will let you use colons or commas to separate addresses. If you send an email, you need to do this to prove 100% that the message was indeed sent and you therefore have a pristine copy should a DCA try to change it and say you said something different. We've seen it a few times in the PDL forums on this site.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to yes, but that will incur a cost to you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember, that in almost all circumstances, an email acts just like a letter in the eyes of the law.

 

However, for all legal requests, such as lba's/SAR's or CCA requests, it is much better to send the request or statement by "snail mail".

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate. They didn't put that on my letter! There's no e-mail contact addy at all. :!: I wonder why?

 

In any case, I have decided to skip the e-mail after reading other threads and just go with the recorded delivery post.

 

Thanks though for all your advice and I will post back when/if I get a reply from them.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Just to update people. I posted off the SB/Doorstep letter to Scotcall.

 

I basically got a reply from them saying that they have noted my dispute and closed the account. I will not be hearing from them again regarding the account but that they are sending the account back to Aktiv/BCW group and that if I want more info to contact them directly.

 

I am just gonna wait and see which one I hear from next, if at all, and then go from there.

 

Just thought I would let you all know.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If scotcall have sent it back, then the debts well and truely unenforceable. They are one of the lowest forms of dca there are.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i new to this but as far as i know they can only come to you doorstep if they have an appointment (OFT rules) and if u do not wish to make and appt with them u dont have to, withdraw their implied right of access, they have very little power. if they do come knocking on ur door after u have done this u can call the police and have them upp for tresspassing.

 

all the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I know, I have already written to them about all of that and they have stopped chasing this debt. I was just updating the thread so that other readers can see what the outcome was. There is nothing worse than reading threads and not knowing how the person ever eventually got on with their case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will mark the thread as sorted.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...