Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • example You have an aged parent/grandparent, with compromised immune in a separate household You have children, with children which you help with to school and after school - in separate households all at work none on furlough Your other half (second partner) has the same   Want to count how many 'laws' you are breaking by assisting with grandchildren from 2-4 different households, alongside two aged parents in two separate households   Let alone the pair of you then seeing each other Let alone actually seeing any of your friends .. Let alone the other members of your family seeing each other   ... Unless you all go on a fox hunt or grouse shoot that is
    • Your supports mean to me a lot. What I have realised is money can’t buy happens and I have made a mistake which I have never done it before. I don’t save that much money and looking a job at the moment. As long they can send a letter to where I can collect it then I don’t mind but I’ll call them tomorrow.   you have been supportive and May Gold help you too. Thank you 🙏🏽 
    • so all in all you failed to reply to all the court letters? and you got them all well in time to do so? and the last thing you did was write to TfL before you ever got the court letters?   if i were to sum this up.... you have got off extremely lightly here!!   you knowingly bought a fake 16+ card on the black market and fraudulently used it some 128 times to travel for free at the expense of the public purse.    if we were to break that down into its best possible picture... that means for 25 WEEKS (almost 6mts) you fraudulently used it to travel backwards and forwards to wherever ...5 days a week.   you got off VERY lightly!!   we have seen people fined £1500+ for less usage of a fake card. you were very very lucky not too be charged with the more serious offence of multiple fraud.   sorry but i don't think you have anywhere to go with this and doing anything bar arranging payment ASAP once you get the judgement letter , will result in a far greater punishment.   you should have come here months and months ago then we might have been able to have helped, and p'haps gotten an out of court settlement but it would have been the same sum i expect.   but if i were to again be totally honest here had you come here and asked for help..and the result was £370 fine , i would view that as a good win for us too.    
    • See what dx says, you may need to contact the court.   I understand you're upset but it's not the end of the world. Why didn't you go to the court two days ago?   HB
    • I’m living with my friends now and looking a job. The only address I can give them is the one reside now but how would I communicate with TfL. I’m really shaking now and not how should I not think about this situation.   My previews house mates used to tell me if I received letters when they used to live there but there are no longer reside there.
  • Our picks

Employment Tribunal soon and I still feel bullied


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3001 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I worked for a company for nearly five years, I used to love it. Then the last few months, the company started to struggle and the boss was hardly around. Out of the blue I got handed a long list of 'evidence' constituting in the whole to gross misconduct. Earlier we had been given a contract to sign which had changed and I hadn't signed it and written a letter stating I wasn't happy to. I think it was this that angered the boss who then knocked my hours down and spent the time I wasn't in trawling my computer and printed off so called evidence. Silly things like joke emails and banter, that sort of stuff. I'm pretty sure it's not gross misconduct. I was the hardest worker there. And I was accused of being a detriment to the companies success. I feel victimised and bullied, and because of my treatment all the other staff members left within the space of 2 months. There isn't anybody there anymore. Both disciplinary and appeal hearings seemed to have already predetermined outcomes and the sheer tone of voice in all the letters I have received is extremely upsetting. I logged it with the tribunal as unfair dismissal as I believe whole heartedly that I have done nothing wrong.

 

I am now currently going through the process of case management orders. I have met all the deadlines and adhered to them. The bundle of documents has been sorted, even though I had to make the respondent aware quite a few of my documents had not been included but listed, and both parties have exchanged witness statements. It has been a month now and the respondent has suddenly decided to add an additional set of documents to the bundle. I suspect he is only doing this now as he has read my witness statement and is trying to cover himself. Is he allowed to do this when the date has passed for the case management orders? It seems a little unfair as he could just keep adding more and more up until the day itself, and I have to prepare myself for it all. It's messy enough as it stands without any extra in there. The message has come through his solicitors who basically say in no two words they are adhering to the respondent. I'm surprised a solicitor would allow it. I would have thought the dates on the case management orders are there for a reason. Any help on what to do would be most appreciated. I don't have a solictor, I'm going this alone as I can't afford one sadly. Mainly because I'm out of a job now due to all of this. I'll be glad when it's all over to be fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

define "banter." One man's banter is another's racism, sexism, etc.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
define "banter." One man's banter is another's racism, sexism, etc.

 

Oh gosh, not racism or sexism. It was things like daft pictures, jokes. One in particular was a photomontage of a colleague which he then put on Facebook afterwards. Out of everybody who worked there I'd say I was the person who did all of this the least, hence why I felt singled out. Even the boss privy to this sort of thing. Nobody else got investigated either. Although I think the threat was there, hence why everybody upped and left. I feel like I've been made a scapegoat. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I don't really understand what the reason they gave for your dismissal was?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they have an electronic usage policy? This should be in the staff handbook. If you have breached this, it doesn't matter whether others breached it or not, although you could argue that you were treated differently from them. However, you would have to show the company knew about the others' usage but failed to issue any reprimand.

 

Not wise to access social networking sites during working hours or send "amusing" mass emailings as your bosses will have the right to retrieve the downloads and take action if you have breached rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reference to electronic usage policy.

it is possible that your boss has brought one in recently just to cover his back.

if you have one, i would get it checked out, because the use of social networking sites and the internet use at work being freely available and fairly new, the policy is quite a new thing, its not that old, if you had a handbook when you first started, 5 years ago, it is doubtful that this policy is in there.

i was told that handbooks are given every year (??) i have yet to get another one, ive been with my employer 3 years and there is nothing in the handbook regarding the use of the internet or social networking sites. we have since got a policy, it is on a piece of paper, kept in the union office, and a lot of employees, if not all of them, have yet to see it.

 

id get the policy checked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your emails, banter, etc., were reasonable and no objections were raised at the time, you could have a case, particularly if your boss was privy to it and you were treated differently from everyone else with regards to action taken. You can usually use internet and social networking sites 'reasonably' for personal use in the workplace.

 

What was the 'evidence' you were presented with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bluelemon27,

 

I believe both sides can continue to add to the bundle - even on the day of the hearing either side has the right to roll up with something they may wish to include. (The other side may ask for a short adjournment to consider the effects of the inclusion of the documents at such a late stage). So, maybe additions to the bundle are not uncommon.

 

Maybe the following website and blog might help you. http://etclaims.co.uk/tag/bundle/

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...