Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

opos and a very urgent message


janis6670
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just had a "very urgent" message from the opos office (sounded like the Home Office at first) urging me to call back URGENTLY.

Could this be regarding an old Minicredit loan which I recently disputed on Noddle.

Have I unwittingly sparked their interest

Needless to say I won`t be calling

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite right, never get involved on the phone with these people, if you are unsure what they are chasing ignore until they explain in full in writting.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's Opos who have contacted you then It will be in reference to Minicredit, I have been going round and round in circles with them for several months. From experience Opos will not answer any emails or letters, however if you do send them a letter by recorded delivery they will reply....

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was a voicemail from a glasgow number but giving a 0844 number to reply to. and hr sounded very official

 

Ha ha 'sounded official' nothing official about these clowns.

 

And don't get into the habit of corresponding with DCA's with recorded delivery, if they can get away with using snail mail 2nd class post, then so can you, just obtain proof of posting from the PO counter.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ignore the idiots... do not phone them and if they catch you out and you answer your phone to them do not answer their security questions and tell them that you will only deal with them in writing. Have you sent them a telephone harassment letter yet? http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/Debt::_Letter_Templates

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they have now called you twice you could complain to your local Trading Standards office calling into question their fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

 

The Office of Fair Trading lay down standards that they expect companies to comply with-the document can be found below-

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/OFT664Rev.pdf

 

On page 11 the OFT lay out their definitions of what they consider to be unfair tactics in communication. What Opos are doing is almost exactly what the OFT say they should not be doing-

 

 

Communication

3.2 It is unfair to communicate with debtors, or their representatives, in whatever form, in an unclear, inaccurate or misleading manner.21

3.3 Examples of unfair or improper practices are as follows:

a. use of official looking documents intended to, or likely to, mislead debtors as to their status.

For example, documents made to resemble court documents.

b. leaving out or presenting information in such a way that it creates, or has the potential to create, a false or misleading impression, or exploits a debtor's lack of knowledge

c. those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who they work for, what their role is and the purpose of the contact

d. sending misleading communications or making misleading statements which may induce a debtor to make contact on the basis of a false or misleading premise

 

 

C and D are the two examples that Opos have breached.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha 'sounded official' nothing official about these clowns.

 

And don't get into the habit of corresponding with DCA's with recorded delivery, if they can get away with using snail mail 2nd class post, then so can you, just obtain proof of posting from the PO counter.

 

even better is to email, CC your own address and print out when you get the chance... Why pay 50p for a 2nd class stamp?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am frmly of the opinion that e-mail for speed BUT written confirmation by post is the security.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmm automated anything when it come to finacial matters is risky think on the banks IT melt downs!!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmm automated anything when it come to finacial matters is risky think on the banks IT melt downs!!!!

 

important letters then yeah send by recorded - but general DCA crap/letter tennis then there's no reason not to e-mail. automated response is as god as a signature evidencing receipt of a letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received your email , I am at a loss in what to say, you borrowed funds above and paid nothing back.

 

 

 

I have attached a letter we have sent to you today , I presume the client we represent want the matter heard at court due to your continued default, it’s also been with a previous debt collection agency who you were supposedly meant to make agreement/s to pay back the funds.

 

 

 

We have called you once at work but we certainly will not be calling again if you feel harassed.

 

 

 

I WOULD ALSO ASK YOU AT THIS POINT TO MAKE ANY COMPLAINT WITH OUR GOVERNING BODYS , I DONT THINK 1 PHONE CALL AND 3 LETTER SENT TO YOU WOULD STAND AS HARRASMENT IN ANY COURT.

 

 

 

My clients feel you have clearly took the funds without any intent to give back, we will be supplying the courts with the agreement you took and the statement of your account.

 

 

 

Think you would be best to get some form or representation for the hearing,.

 

 

 

Let us get the matter to your small claims court.

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

 

 

Download.html?IDMSG=15434&PJRANG=2&NAME=__PJ_FULL_NAME_ENCODED__&FOLDER=INBOX&STREAM_TYPE=IMAGE&EMBEDDED=true

This is the reply I had after requesting no urther contact by phone. As Victor Meldrew would say " I don"t believe it!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that via email or a letter they sent? Is that verbatim?

 

I would strongly urge you to forward that nice bit of evidence to the OFT&TS tomorrow.

 

Anyone talking to me in such a condescending manner will get short shrift and be in a world of hurt, unbelievable!!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have receivedno response to our previous requests for payment of£4,001.87 on the above mentioned account.

Wehave been asked to evaluate your file for transfer to a Doorstep CollectionAgent with the intention to visit youat your premises within 14 days in order to recover the above outstandingamount including costs and to assess you at your property.

Itis not too late to avoid this action and even at this stage we are prepared toassist you in resolving this matter. To do so please call now on 08443722459. You can also make immediate payment by creditor debit card via our automated payment line by calling 0844 557 8321.

THis is the attachment also sent with a duplicate of the first email

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hah they seriously sent that? The OFt would definitley be interested in that little number.

 

Also have a look in the library for info on doorstep collectors. These idiots just drop themselves in it, deeper and deeper each and everytime.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Janis Dont be worried by these fools

 

First of all they wont take you to court, its simply there to scare you. You dont use representation in the small claims court, it wouldnt go to "your small claims court", but the local county court. Talking utter rubbish!

 

With regards to them saying they are going to get someone to come and asses you, what are they going to do?, take a medial , put you in a strait jacket?

 

Just to be on the safe side, email him a copy of the "No door step visitors letters". also advise that if anyone calls you will call the police to have them assessed for removal from your premises!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...