Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Advice Please


MrNobody
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will be posting a friends ESA50 form for her today as it is due back this week.

 

If I put in a covering letter detailing what she is not capable of doing, will it help? Bear in mind I am on ESA too and I am due a medical which I will likely fail myself, so could lead to them chasing me up sooner than expected.

 

If she fails the eventual medical, will she lose her HB and CT benefits as well or will she go onto another benefit and keep her HB and CT?

 

Is the appeal process easy? For example, do they provide appeal forms readily?

 

Sorry for all the questions. I'm worried she will lose her ESA and be left with no money, but still have bills and rent/council tax to pay.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

If you have time to look at it, there's a very good sticky by leemack that tells you how to fill in an ESA50. I think you're on the right track though and a look at the descriptors might help you. Theres a link to them in the sticky I'm about to give you a link to.

 

I can't answer your questions about other benefits, but I'm sure the guys will know. If you fail the Atos 'medical' you need to ask for your case to be reconsidered by the DWP, who will probably uphold the decision. If that fails, you're off to a tribunal.

 

The way to start an appeal is to fill in a GL24 that you can find online or request from the DWP. Or I believe you can write a letter.

 

I think I'm right in saying that ESA continues at the assessment rate while you wait for the appeal, but the rules keep changing so it would be nice if someone confirmed that for you.

 

Here's a link to the appeals and tribunals sticky.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251737-Appealing-or-going-to-a-Tribunal-Some-useful-information%281-Viewing%29-nbsp

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I've read one of LeeMack's threads but the main ESA50 thread is missing the part for mental health unfortunately.

 

Thanks for all the info, we'll take it one step at a time and hope she can pass this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I put in a covering letter detailing what she is not capable of doing, will it help? Doubt very much it will make any difference at all

 

If she fails the eventual medical, will she lose her HB and CT benefits as well or will she go onto another benefit and keep her HB and CT? If she fails the face to face assessment (sorry, pet hate of mine calling it a medical - nothing medical about it!) she will lose her 'automatic entitlement' to HB and CTB but can immediately inform the LA of her incomings and savings and they will transfer it to income based and she will then continue to receive the same benefits.

 

Is the appeal process easy? For example, do they provide appeal forms readily? In some ways it is easy. They don't provide the forms readily as in I think they should be included with the decision letter so you don't have to ask for it, but the appeal forms are available on request. You need to inform the DWP in writing using the form of your intention to appeal within 28 days, you should state why you disagree with then decision based on what descriptors you feel were incorrectly scored. Once the appeal is in you then have time to gather evidence from the professionals providing care for yourself ready to go to Tribunal. It helps to be represented there in an official capactity, statistically. Also they should then pay ESA at the assessment rate from then on until the Tribunal decision.

 

 

Have answered within your post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MrNobody:

 

I'd forget the covering letter for now cos Atos are unlikely to read it. They have enough trouble reading ESA50s. A letter, sent to your friend's benefit delivery centre in support of her claim, and giving details of her problems with the prescribed activities should be read by the decision maker cos they're supposed to consider all the evidence.

 

Jobcentreplus admit to cross referencing claims to prevent fraud.

 

Eligibility for housing/council tax benefit is determined by low income, not other benefits.

 

Appeals. Way way ahead of yourself but I know you're anxious so;

The GL24 appeal form is readily available, to download from the internet, or for the asking, from Jobcentreplus.

Until the law changes next April, you can ask Jobcentreplus to pay assessment rate employment and support once they've acknowledged a valid appeal.

Appeals are dammed hard work and very stressful but winnable if the appellant meets the criteria for the benefit.

 

Best wishes, Margaret. :panda:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

'sorry, pet hate of mine calling it a medical ......'

 

disability assessment - sort of, maybe, possibly, if the assessors listened to us

 

face to face assessment - nah, the assessors hide behind their LIMA screens

 

interview under caution - feels like it

 

messical - says it all

 

Shall save 'health care professionals' for another day.

 

:flame:Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'sorry, pet hate of mine calling it a medical ......'

 

disability assessment - sort of, maybe, possibly, if the assessors listened to us

 

face to face assessment - nah, the assessors hide behind their LIMA screens

 

interview under caution - feels like it

 

messical - says it all

 

Shall save 'health care professionals' for another day.

 

:flame:Margaret.

 

Ha! Love it! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...