Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Particulars of claim Business accounts


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The claimant has held a current account with the defendant, conducted on their

Standard terms and conditions since (DATE) , The defendant from

(DATE) to present day has applied charges to the claimant account,

totaling £XXXXX. The bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable. Penalty charges are irrecoverable at common law. The precedent for this was Dunlop Pneumatic v New Garage [1915] AC 79.along with Murray v. Leisure play [2005] EWCA Civ 963. The claimant has repeatedly asked the bank to refund their charges or offer proof that they are true pre-estimate. They have declined to do so.

 

The claimant claims £XXXXX, being the sum unlawfully debited

 

The claimant claims interest pursuant to S69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the

rate of 8% per annum, being the sum of £XXXX

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Re: Barclays:confused:

 

I need your assistance please.

 

Barclays sent me letter dated 30 November an offer of £80 out of £580 as their gesture of goodwill but I am not accepting it. Am I correct to use the rejection of settlement offer letter?(Response to settlement offer letter). I have not sent barcalys the LBA as they responded to me on 30 Nov received on 2 December.

 

The Response to settlement offer letter, last para " My letter before action sent previously indicates that you have until xx/x/xx... ( do I have to put a date here knowing for well that I did not send them the Sticky 3 the Letter Before Action (LBA) please help:confused:

 

Thank you and kind regards

 

davaom2

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi

 

I need some guidence here;

 

Had a company which closed last year, had a business account with Barclays, charges est. £16k, I had to pay all the bank charges and payments as the personal guarantor (Sole Director) The question is, If I paid all the charges and costs, even though the company was limited, and is now closed and so is the bank account, can i pursue the reclaim of charges on behalf of the company from the last 6 years?

 

sg51bmw

:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

i am going to court on the 13 th april as Barclays will not release my notifiaction of charges for more that 3 years, as you were in business you will no what these statements are , both our names are on the account but i am pursuing the claim mysel as a partner, so i don,t see the problem with you pursuing your claim as the director of the company if you have your name on the account, however you will need you Notifaiction of charges to reclaim an accurate amouont, a guess- t- mate amount is very dubious in court as they[ bank] may defend an unaccurate claim.

 

HTH

 

Hels

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hels

 

thanks for the reply, I have the notification of charges, however as a limited company I think anything claimed would go back to the creditors via the liquidator anyway - limited company , so slightly different rules to partnerships

 

I will look into it further - thx :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi sg51bmw

 

even with a limited company the person or persons who are on the cheque book have a right of claim, if you have gone bankrupt then after three years the dept is clean anyway so yes your right in that it the time has not lasped the liquidators will come calling if you claim money back, perhaps you should wait, or at least makew sure you have all your data so you can claim at a later date, thie time is drawing near when someone will test going back more than 6 years and probably start a president for the rest of us to follow.

 

HTH

hels:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I am about to post a claim against Barclays for a Business Account.

 

Have just received the data re charges from Barclays, within the DPA limits.

 

Can you confirm whether I use the same spreadsheets to calculate interest and charges, or are there different ones for Business accounts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welshaman,

 

would you mind elaborating on what you have received from Barclays, do you mean monthly statements or Notification of Charges, or both, this is purely personal interest.

 

thanks

 

hels

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello,

 

I also have a business account and have 2 seperate claims pending for siginificant amounts. My issue is that after the letters were sent to the business manager my business was placed in administration (not really connected to th claims).

 

I also believe that any claim contiuned will benefit the administrators of the company.

 

I also wish to find anyone who has claims against a factoring division of a bank with regards to charges etc.

 

Many thanks

 

Silversamosa.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...