Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Shire Leasing/Total Digital Solutions Limited Anyone had dealings ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4059 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Total Digital Solutions Limited were the subject of Administration and RSM Tenon Recovery were appointed

joint Administrators on 1st August 2012.

An immediate disposal of TDS was the business and assets was done by sale to Apogee Corporation Limited on the same day.

TDS appear to have used Shire leasing for customer agreements.

TDS core business was described as supply of latest technology,document,printy,copy,scan,and management services,and traded from premises in North West.

 

I have been made aware that there are some business owners who are now questioning the validity of the contracts they entered into with TDS.

I have seen evidence which shows that TDS mis sold an agreement,and when challenged,agreed to take over the remaining liability and continue the payments to Shire.

For almost a year the business concerned made no payments and assumed that TDC as indicated in writing was paying.

The dispute around the legitimacy of the agreement involved a number of things.

1.That the Customer was led to believe that the contract was only for 12 months which turned out to be 5 years.

2.That the customer was then offered a telecoms marketing package which comprised of bluetooth technology being provided outside his premises.

Although a printer/copier was listed on the agreement,no printer was provided.When questioned about this the response was unacceptable.

No mention of the bluetooth or associated services was made on the agreement

3.TDS applied a personal guarantee on the agreement,which the business man assures me he did not agree to or know about.

 

The Business is now recieving telephone demands for arrears on 2 accounts from Shire.

Shire have been informed of the situation,and in fact an email exists from when the arrangement was made by TDS to take over the account liability.

 

When asked to provide these demands in writing,Shire said they had no need to do so and would be taking proceedings if he did not pay.

 

Shire themselves are no strangers to controversy,and an internet search reveals that they were a party to previous regulatory investigations.

 

Shire are holders of a number of Consumer Credit licences.

 

If anyone has been affected by the TDS Administration and sale,please post details in this thread.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I have had similar experience with Shire Leasing and a telecoms company called Global Telecoms & Technologies that went bust in February 2010. We specifically took out a 2 year contract with Global, underwritten by Shire Leasing. After Global's demise, we had to transfer to BT. We paid out more money to have BT pick up our telephone services, however we continued to honour the two year contract, only to find that Shire Leasing held a copy, supplied to them by Global which had been changed to a 74 month contract from a 24 month contract!!

 

We are going to go to court on 27 March 2013 and have issued a Counterclaim against Shire. We have the original bottom carbon copy of the documentation that we signed, which clearly differs from the document Shire are relying on. We also discovered that the delivery note given to Shire quite clearly had a forged signature (name was spelt wrong!)

 

Does any have any similar stories involving Shire that we could include in our court hearing?

 

Iain Bailey - BDS architects Cambridge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...