Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unenforceable Debt - Advice/Suggestions Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All!

 

I have not posted here for a while mainly due to ill health.

 

However,as I feel abit better,I want to run through with you folks as written below:

 

Scenario as follows:

 

1.Obtained unsecured loan for doubleglazing just over 10 years ago.

 

2.The loan had PPI added to it

3.After obtaining a SAR it was revealed that there was a “secret commission”.

4.Original creditor sells debt to DCA .

5.Arrangement is made to clear the debt(Tomlin Order) with DCA.

6.Arrangement is broken and CCJ is obtained by DCA.

7.CCJ was then followed by Charging Order on my home.

 

8.Having read through various posts the original debt seems to be unenforceable mainly due the “secret commission” .

9.The commission was given to the dg salesperson that I was purchasing at the time.

10.The company that I had bought the dg went into liquidation a few years ago.

 

 

All the above happened several years ago.

 

I have been too ill to deal with this earlier but feel abit better and ready to deal with this now.

 

My questions are as follows:

 

a.What is the best way forward in order to sue either/both the original creditor and the DCA and get the CCJ removed?

 

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT….

 

1,The original creditor should have never sold the debt as there was an ongoing dispute.

 

2.Also as it seems that both parties knew that the debt was unenforceable.

 

3.I did receive a rebate of PPI from the DCA but I still believe the balance has an element of PPI remaining due to compound interest.

 

 

b. How can a DCA go to court,obtain a CCJ and then a Charging Order with the full knowledge that it has no right to enforce the debt in the first place?

Is this not a form of fraud or deceit?

Or worse i.e.contempt of court?

 

 

c.Can I obtain a refund of any of the payments that I have made whether to the Original Creditor and/or the DCA? Naturally I would have already made more than enough payments to cover the value of the “cash purchase” value plus some interest.

 

d.Is it correct to say that I would only legally owe the value of the item but not the interest as the secret commission voids the agreement?

 

 

If you have any questions,please just ask.

 

 

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

 

Note:I have NOT included the name of the DCA due to ongoing litigation.

Edited by Nightmare4banks
Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you find out about the secret commission ? Were you given any booklet at the time of taking out the loan (such as an FLA booklet ?) Is there anything in the agreement saying that they may/will pay commission to the company ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago was this ?...The high court cases you should look at are Wilson vs Hurstanger, Kelvin Jack vs Imageview, you should also look at Sealey and Winfield -v- Loans.co.uk Ltd (1) and GE Money Secured Loans Ltd (2) (2011) and Barnes -v- Black Horse Ltd (2011)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42 man,

 

Thanks for your prompt response.I am familiar with the first 2 cases that you have quoted but must look at the others too.

 

In reply to your question:

 

1.The loan was taken out in either 2000 or 2001 - I cannot remember for sure.

2.I found out about the secret commission by sending £10 to the original creditor for the DSAR and this information came back with the copies of the original loan paperwork.

3.No FLA booklet was given at the time.

4.I don't think there is anything there is to say in the paperwork that they will pay anything to the company.

5.Please remember it was the DG salesperson who sold me loan and ppi not a person from the original creditor or underwriting insurance company.

 

If you have any more questions just ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So am I correct in saying that they sent you the underwriters sheet with the commission stated ? May I ask how much the commission was (no need to be exact). Do check the agreement to see if there is any implied terms to say that a commission was to be paid. Have you thought about getting some advice from a specialist solicitor ?....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man,

 

Thanks for your last post.

 

I n reply to your question:

 

1.Yes it was a separate sheet amongst the loan paperwork copies.I cannot recall the commission amount.I will have to get back to you on that one,

2.I really do not think that there is any implied term in the agreement.

3.However,the salesperson most certainly never verbally or in writing at any stage told me about getting a commission for selling the loan and ppi or are there any documents other than the paperwork received in response the DSAR.

4.I did speak to a law firm recently but they have stopped doing cases that fall under this "enforeceability" category.

 

If you any more questions,just ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi N4b. Sorry you haven't been so good, and had these problems. Good to hear from you though.

 

How long ago were the CCJ and CO, and did you attend court when they were obtained?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caro,

 

Thanks for your kind words.Yes it is nice to be back but I have to be careful with my heslth.

 

Anyway,in reply to your questions:

 

1.Both were obtained a couple of years ago.

2.I attended both if recall correctly but it would hardly make any difference if there is a CCJ and instalment order breached too i.e. missed payment(s).

3.Therefore,it becomes in this particular case the creditor's "trump card" and mostly pointless therefore in challenging it.

4.However,there must be some exceptions in cases which naturally would depend on exact particular circumstances etc.

 

Just my 2p's worth!

Edited by Nightmare4banks
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...