Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Desperately seeking help used car problems !!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am a new user after some advice.

I purchased a used Porsche Boxster from a trader last week paying for the car on Tuesday 07/08/2012 and picked the car up Friday 10/08/2012.

 

On the drive home I noticed a problem engaging 4th gear which continued for nearly all the gear changes on the way home.

 

I was offered a test drive but only got to drive a mile and only engaged 4th gear twice in that as it was on a country road and the problem did not show.

 

Also the car was advertised as having 77000 on the clock and actually has 80000, a stamp in the service book confirms it had done 79000 at the beginning of July.

 

The advertisement also states "Porsche service history" but on closer inspection only 2 out of the 9 stamps are actually Porsche.

 

Also before purchase I asked the dealer if there were any faults with the car to which he replied "No Known faults" I have this as a text message.

 

The dealer claimed to have driven the car some 200 miles to have a new rear screen fitted the week before, so must have experienced the fault.

 

Having contacted one or two specialist garages who say that there is a fault with the syncromesh on this gear, a serious and expensive repair.

 

I have written to the dealer stating that I wish to reject the vehicle on the grounds that it is not of satisfactory quality and the fact that I was mislead over the mileage and fault situation.

 

I am awaiting a response from the dealer and welcome any comments as to what I shoild say when the dealer contacts me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not notice the mileage discrepancy as I was concentrating on checking that everything worked.

 

The service book had stamps in it but at that time I was unable to verify whether they were dealers or not,

its only on later checking that I have confirmed them to be ordinary garages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would say that there is mileage (pardon the pun) in pursuing a claim for the mileage and service discrepancies alone as it is obviously a case of miss-selling. Did you give the seller a time limit in your letter? Also if you have indicated that you are rejecting the car, you cannot use it again.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. Yes I have given the dealer 7 days to rectify the matter i.e to refund and collect the vehicle. I have also stated that apart from the trip home I have not and will not use the car. Any advice on what I should say when he contacts me >

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fully understand what you are saying here, but I don't think you have much to go on the 'play of words' you are complaining about.

 

It's not tens of thousands of miles, just a couple of thousand and might well have been correct at the time the advert was written, it can hardly be classified as an attempt to falsify the mileage. The same goes with the servicing, a play on words, it says 'Porsche service history' and it has Porsche service history.

Gearbox problem! he said 'No Known faults', there may well have been no known faults when he said that. You didn't notice any problem with the gearbox when you test drove it.

 

We had this problem with I believe the same car a few years ago, (I can't find the thread at the moment), and that was sorted in the end with I believe court action or threats of such. Maybe the others involved in that thread will remember more and help in finding it.

 

It's a costly fault and you should get the opinion of a gearbox specialist on the cause of the fault so your complaint and rejection has a solid foundation, it should also be on headed paper with full company details to give it credibility.

The regulations say that it is up to the seller to show the fault wasn't there at the time of sale, so keep that in mind.

 

Let us know how he responds to your rejection request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No response from dealer as yet! Have booked the car in with a gearbox specialist for a diagnostic next week. If the dealer does not respond do I send another letter stating that I am taking him to court or just lodge the claim on line with the court system costs £210. Anyone had experience of anything similar and if I take him to court what are the chances of winning as I simply cannot afford to loose this money. Will post the dealers response as soon as I recieve one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...