Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help with next step re: Bryan Carter/ Arrow Court Proceedings


OHW
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

B Carter are acting on behalf of Arrow Global, who have for some time alleged I owe them over £350.

 

a few weeks ago BC sent me an offer saying they will knock £50 if I pay immediately.

 

I have now received court papers from Northampton for this alleged debt and bizzarely the court and solicitors fees add up to the original amount.

 

What is going on here?

 

They are also not claiming statutory interest, why not if they think I owe this debt?

 

This allaged debt is from 2006 and yes, it shows on my credit file (until 2007).

 

I dont really know how to proceed.

 

Its all CC charges and interest on charges (CC is not from Arrow either). Really annoyed by whole situation.

 

Anyone any advice or similar experience?

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks so much for replying,

 

POC:

 

The claimants claim is for the balance due under an agreement which is now all due and payable

 

The defendant agreed to pay monthly installments under account numer xxxxxxxx but has failed to do so.

 

and the claimant claims the sum of xxxx

 

The claims also claims interest thereon pursuant to s.69 count court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to 0.00

 

The amount claimed is xxxx + court fee (£15) plus solicitors costs. Which amount up to original amount owed before they knocked money off.

 

Looking at on my credit file I originally opened account in 2005 and its marked as defaulted the beginning of 2007. No payments recorded on the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was CC agreement. About 2/3 is charges. Id be happy to pay the original amount owed although I guess if I counterclaimed then it would be wiped out with stat interest. I dont know how things work really and this is all new to me. Im guessing they are randomly doing this either because its about to drop off my credit file or that I recently got a job (at last).

Link to post
Share on other sites

send the letter below by recorded delivery to brian carter on monday, i take it the claim is from Northampton CCBC so have you acknowledged online. on the claim form will be a password

 

we will prob end up getting a 28 day extension to file a defencelink3.gif as to CPR 15.5 but please acknowledge the claim on line and send to uncle bryan what i have posted below by recorded delivery first thing monday

 

DO NOT TOUCH THE DEFENCE OR SUBMIT ANY DEFENCE (MOST IMPORTANT) until advised

 

if uncle bryan fails to come up with the documents, we file an application noticelink3.gif to strike out the claim

 

 

PLEASE CONFIRM THE CLAIM IS BELOW £5000

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name)

 

Case No:

 

CPR 31.14Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the(Name) countycourt.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court inwhich I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR31.14 for the disclosure and the production of averified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s)mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 The agreement.

 

You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reasonof the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where aclaim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constitutingthe agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim andthe original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any generalconditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 The deed of assignment.

 

3 The notice of assignment including proof of service.

 

 

4 The default notice.

 

5 The termination notice. (not mentioned in the POClink3.gif but no harm asking just might not get)

 

 

Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and willin all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination uponmy delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defenceand the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisionsof CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 dutiesby claiming otherwise

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to andreceived by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable andproportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, thebetter for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provideme with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document,the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will havea right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case.You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose ofthis case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more thanone version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration orother marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you mustprovide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making areasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligationto recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of athird party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake tobe responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying withthis CPR 31.14request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tellme in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with thisrequest has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me whatsteps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this requestand also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In additionyour statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to anextension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must benot less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with myrequest and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you willnever be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail torequest more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of mydefence, I will make an application to the court for an order that theproceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costsorder.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully (print name)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, this is great, Ill up date you as I go along. I did file acknowledgement yesterday. Will the court tell me when i need to do each step?

 

Oh and my name has changed, what kind of issues will this entail? (do you know)?

Edited by OHW
added question.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, this is great, Ill up date you as I go along. I did file acknowledgement yesterday. Will the court tell me when i need to do each step?

 

 

AFRAID NOT

 

we have to abide by strict time tables now

 

if uncle bryan has not contacted you by 6 august by letter we go for a strike out, but knowing him, he will agree to a 28 day extension

 

let me know when you get a reply or if not, update your thread on 6 august

 

keep your original name for now

 

uncle bryan normally withdraws the claim if any sort of defence is submitted

 

he likes the easy life "judgement by default"

 

he is hoping you will just ignore the claim

 

no chance of that happening

Edited by squaddie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would update as I think I know why he has knocked off money and then added it on (and charged no interest). Its so he can pay less fees! So what hes actually done is reduced it so he can get a discount on the fee, and I guess hoping I will panic and call them up. Well, considering I disagree with the whole process and the amount, and well, everything, I dont really care for these tactics. Its strange they are trying to take me to court for a debt of less than £300 now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Can I just clarify, BC only mention an 'agreement' and none of the other documents, am I able to request the other doucments purely because they relate to the agreement? Will they send me a statement with how they come to this figure I allegedly owe?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I remember that I had to register while acknowledging. Do not lose your log in/ registration details. If you still cannot gain access you will need to call them up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...