Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4266 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am new to this forum and am having trouble with bailiffs. I stupidly allowed bailiffs into my home on two separate occasions and received a levy on household goods against council tax debts.

They levied the same goods on three different liability orders and I think this is incorrect. Does anyone know if this procedure is right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first thing to do is send this to the bailiff firm with a copy sent to the council revenues department it can done by e-mail

Name

Address

bailifflink3.gif Ref: Account No: 123456

Council Ref No: 435672

Date

Dear Sir,

With reference to the above account please provide me with a breakdown of all fees charged and payments made for the above account

This includes:

a - the time & date of any bailifflink3.gif action that incurred a Fee.

b - The reason for the fee.

c - The name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - The name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificatedlink3.gif at.

e - The date of the Certification.

This is not a Subject access requestlink3.gif under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10.

The National Standards for Enforcement Agents state that if a written request is made an itemised account of fees will be provided.

Please provide the information requested within 14 days of this E-mail /recorded delivery letter

Yours faithfully

Ripped off customer

get this information from the council you should be able to get this over the phone so have a pen/paper ready

 

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

 

 

 

what council is it ?

what bailiff firm is it?

 

tell us exactly what goods have been written on all notice of seizure's

council tax outstanding balance and fees charged on all notice of seizure's

dates of all notice of seizure's

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiffs are Jacobs and they told me that if I did not let them in my home they would send round enforcement officers so I let them in each time. I have since paid one off which had goods levied on it. They have not sent a receipt but the amount was for the first one issued which had a tv, laptop, dvd player, old leather sofa and old cd player on it. They attached the same goods to the next two

The council is colchester borough council

Edited by fraujaeger
more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

can you tell us council tax outstanding balance and fees charged on all notice of seizurelink3.gif's

dates of all notice of seizure's

 

was the account you paid in full paid before they levied your goods the 2nd time

 

the answerers to these questions are important because if goods are already subject to a levy they cant be levied again

the dates of the Levy's outstanding balance to the council and fees charged are also important it helps us work out if the Levy's were charged correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the first visit 5/04/12 I had two liabilities given to me

first one for £448.41

second one for ££516.16

These were for a previous address which I had to move out from after losing my job

I was handed a notice of seizure of goods and inventory which included

laptop

2 seater sofa (very old)

32 inch tv

dvd player (very old)

stereo system (veryold)

These items were listed on two separate inventories

I arranged to pay £134 per month for both

 

first notice was for £423.91 plus £74.50 fees which now totals £522.91 (could he not add up)

second notice for £498.16 plus fees of £76.50 which now totals £592.66 (ditto)

I also had to pay £50.00 in cash to the bailiff

 

I paid the first instalment on 6 May 2012 of £134

 

I then received another visit for council tax arrears and again he persauded me to let him in

This amount was for £590.82 plus £102 fees which totals £694.82 (could not add up)

I came to arrangement to pay £60 per month on all three liabilities from 6 June 2012

I paid £50 cash again

He added the same goods which he copied from the previous orders

 

I was told to expect a payment card through the post to pay at a paypoint or post office

I waited for the card to arrive which missed the due date for payment and was sent three leetters telling me I had broken the arrangement and needed to pay all the outstanding amount otherwise the bailiff would come round to seize my goods

I telephone Jacobs explaining that I had not received the payment card and I had the £60 to pay. He threatened me with a seizure of my goods and said if I paid the £458.66 in cash within the next few days I could go back to the old arrangement of £60 per month. This amount was for my first liability order.

I received a payment card the following day and paid up.

I explained that I could not walk very far so needed the card to pay at a close newsagent.

I am on long term sickness until I collect my state pension in March 2013 and at present in receipt of statutory sick pay of £85.85 per week with little housing benefit

I am at present going through a debt relief order which is now with the insolvency agency and the arrears have been added to this although with a walking possession I have to keep paying them or leave my goods outside for collection when I shall be free of all debts to Jacobs.

I just need to know if after paying the first liability order with the goods on it if they have a right to seize them now.

They have not sent a receipt with an official ref no on

I then received another visit and again was persauded to let him in

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot levy the same goods for multiple accounts as ownership passes to the bailiff after the first one so any subsequent levy listing the SAME property would be void, Leeds CC v Throssel 1993 is indicative as it says that multiple fees cannot be charged on accounts enforced on the same day at the same time, so is an argument to use in a Formal Complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

first notice was for £423.91 plus £74.50 fees which now totals £522.91 (could he not add up) £498.41 over charged £24.50

a levy fee on a debt of £423.91 is £37.50 the walking possession fee is £12 (if you signed the WPA) total £49.50 not £74.50

 

second notice for £498.16 plus fees of £76.50 which now totals £592.66 (ditto) £574.66 over charged £18

levy fee £41 walking possession £12

 

your bailiff may get away with one of the Levy's being lawful but not them both as they can only levy your goods once multiple fees/Levy's are not allowed to be charged the same day

 

This amount was for £590.82 plus £102 fees which totals £694.82 (could not add up) £2 over charged

this levy is unlawful because goods are subject to a previous levy

 

as you can see you have well and truly done over not only with the fees charged but also with the multiple Levy's

 

before we can take this further we need the information from Jacobs (breakdown of fees )

 

you say that some this is for a previous address the questions you have to ask the council need to done to confirm you have not been charged for a period after you moved out the property and also the liability order amounts are correct

 

your bailiff has been very bad he should have broken down the fees as in

 

previous visit fees £xxx

levy fee £xxx

walking possession fee £xxx

 

is your bailiff certificated to Jacobs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?210956-On-line-search-to-check-if-a-Bailiff-is-Certificated.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told to expect a payment card through the post to pay at a paypoint or post office

I waited for the card to arrive which missed the due date for payment and was sent three letters telling me I had broken the arrangement and needed to pay all the outstanding amount otherwise the bailiff would come round to seizelink3.gif my goods

 

and i can bet you have been charged a van/attendance fee on one or both accounts because of this

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now a breakdown of Jacobs fees

1st order charged £40.00 plus £12 levy and walking possession fees £24.50 other fees plus paid £50 cash to bailiff

original debt outstanding £498.16 balance ended up £592.66

I have paid this outright after being bulliedon the telephone and being threatened with my goods being taken although they used the same goods on the other two liability orders.

I have now been granted a debt relief order on the two outstanding debts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now a breakdown of Jacobs fees

1st order charged £40.00 plus £12 levy and walking possession fees £24.50 other fees plus paid £50 cash to bailiff

original debt outstanding £498.16 balance ended up £592.66

I have paid this outright after being bulliedon the telephone and being threatened with my goods being taken although they used the same goods on the other two liability orders.

I have now been granted a debt relief order on the two outstanding debts

 

You can still reclaim the overpayment from Jacobs although it may involve som work.

 

First Formal Complaint to council, and copy to MP, Caggers will help with what was lawful charges, and what was overpaid.

 

Jacobs are a nasty bunch and need to be taught a lesson.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your advice and I shall formally complain to the council today with a copy to my mp

I am concerned though that if I do not pay jacobs on the other two debts that have a walking possession on them they will return because although they are subject to a debt relief order because I have a walking possession on them I am still liable to pay the instalments asked for although they are void as you have pointed out because they levied the same goods on them which were already on the first order

I agree with you Jacobs are a nasty bunch and use bullying tactics and unlawful means to get their money

Can you tell me what Jacobs could lawfully charge me for the first order please and what was the £50 cash for that I was asked to hand over

Also when the first bailiff arrived I told him that I would not let him in but he told me that if I did not allow him entry he could apply for an enforcement order

Is this correct

I am trying to get as much info as possible to substantiate a claim for overpayment

Thank you very much so far for all the help you have given me

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still don't have to let them in no matter what they say, the second and subsequent levies are void as they levied the same goods, also you must include the info on bullying to pay even though it is included in the DRO,. He could apply for an order but that would be quite a time away, and may not even be granted given the circumstances. If and when he returns film him with a mobile phone to capture any threats and bullying. he cannot stop you from doing this it is legal, and he can do nothing about it. If he tried to or did snatch the phone he is open to charges of assault theft and criminal damage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have written to Jacobs today pointing out their adding up errors along with their extortionate fees and also their unlawful pratice of levying the same goods on different liability orders. I have asked for a total of £140 to be reimbursed and told them that I have made copies of all paperwork and intend making a formal complaint to the Council with all the paperwork plus a copy of everything to my MP

I will keep you informed of the response and once again thank you so much for all the advice received. Could not have got this far without you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My Debt Relief Order has gone through and Jacobs have sent two liability orders back to the council. However after writing to them asking for an overpayment to be refunded on an order I paid off (overcharged £18.00) they have written back to me with another liability order from September 2011 which I have no correspondence for and was not included in any letters received from them so I can only assume that they made a mistake.

I could have included this in my debt relief order and would like to know if I can still include this debt even though the order has gone through because the debt was incurred before this time.

Jacobs letter is full of errors regarding fees and breakdown of charges and makes comical reading saying that they included and levied the same goods on multiple liability orders to save the debtor any unnecessary stress !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! anyway they know that because I paid one order with the levied goods the remainder are now void and the two included in the debt relief order have been returned to the council which leaves one outstanding as mentioned above for £473.66

Please advise whether this remaining one can be included in my dro

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...