Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 31 March 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 8 April 2024   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 15 April 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y   7 Who is the parking company? Horizon   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Iceland Chester   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Horizon parking Horizon Iceland Chester.pdf
    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equifax Old Defaults and Date Changes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am trying to understand my credit file and would appreciate your help if possible.

 

It is a long story but I had to go away in 2006 and all my creditors were left behind. I returned last year, and I am finally getting around to looking at this. I've been burying my head in the sand with it all.

 

On my Credit file I have the following as outstanding, once i've listed them Ill ask the questions as to what confused me if that is ok?

 

Communications Supplier from Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

Current Balance £1134

Default Balance £393

Start Date 17.05.2006

Default Date 07.07.2007

Date Updated 21.12.2008

 

Current Account Natwest Telford

Current Balance £1707

Default Balance £1779

Start Date 02.10.1996

Default Date 07.07.2007

Date Updated 14.01.2009

 

Current Account Natwest Telford

Current Balance £322

Default Balance £336

Start Date 21.03.2000

Default Date 07.07.2007

Date Updated 14.01.2009

 

Loan from Natwest Personal Loans

Current Balance £801

Default Balance £801

Start Date 21.05.2004

Default Date 05.05.2007

Date Updated 17.05.2007

 

Credit Card from Egg Plc 1

Current Balance £0

Default Balance £1926

Start Date 15.01.2001

Default Date 17.08.2006

Date Updated 17.08.2006

Date Satisfied 17.08.2006

(this isn't satisfied but it isn't mentioned anywhere else on my file)

 

I have a few questions:

 

  • Why does the balance and default balance differ and which one is right?
  • When does it get taken off of my file is it from Deaful date or Date updated?

I don't know what they have updated in some cases there is dares in 2009?

I basically want to know when they will come off of my file?

They are basically 2 bank accounts a loan a credit card and a mobile phone. It is seriously affecting my credit rating and just want a clear picture of when I can expect them to go?

 

 

Thank you in advance and sorry if these are silly questions :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there - the only thing you have to be concerned with here are the actual 'default dates'. The updates shown are when accounts sometimes get reviewed by the lenders and have no baring oher than to give you an indicator as to when they were last interested in the accoun. You may also want to look at the searches on your file to see if there have been any debt collection searches - theses searches stay on for two years.

 

All these account will come off your file after six years from default date, so the Egg one should be due off any time - the rest coming off mid next year. Many people, including myself wouldn't really agree with deliberate failures in paying debts off, but if you are in a position, you may want to contact the creditors and offer them a settlement figure.

 

In short, your file should be clean mid next year. The thing that you would still have to take int consideration would be that, despite searches would not bring any negative information up, lenders may still have their on internal records if you have had dealings with them or any of their sister companies in the past. You will also find it difficult getting credit as you effectively will have no credit history at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default sum = the arrears that were unpaid, if the arrears were paid in line with

the default notice the default would not be placed.

 

The Egg account will have been sold on that is the reason it shows satisfied,

expect contact from a debt collection agency in the near future.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default sum = the arrears that were unpaid, if the arrears were paid in line with

the default notice the default would not be placed.

 

The Egg account will have been sold on that is the reason it shows satisfied,

expect contact from a debt collection agency in the near future.

 

Satisfied on 17th August 2006 and not heard anything yet - more likely that this is an error on egg's part. This will be statute barred by now anyway as it will have been well over six years from last cause of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a number of the ancient accounts cropping up either SB

or nearly so.

I doubt there is any error, and SB will depend on no payments or acknowledgments

in writting.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I saw you mentioned EGG on your report. One thing to check with it comes to EGG - they seem to adopt a model of marking the default satisfied when they sell the account onto a collector. The trouble is that the collector then adds ANOTHER default to your file (this one active).

 

So you end up with TWO defaults for one account.

 

I am currently involved in a legal process for exactly this reason to get EGG to remove an item from my file (after they ignored an ICO ruling in my favour).

 

In their "defense" to the ICO case they claimed registering two defaults for the same thing is "industry practice"....the ICO disagree and promptly reminded them of the laws around Data Protection. Just waiting for the court to enforce the ICO ruling with a legal order.

 

Just something to watch out for.

 

Yozdagger

Link to post
Share on other sites

There can only ever be one default date it cannoty be changed when a debt is sold.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...