Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wiggins calls for cyclist laws


NewsBot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4018 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It should also be LAW for cyclists not to listen to iPods whilst cycling, you need your eyes AND your ears whilst on the road - and don't even get me onto the ones who ingore traffic lights being red at zebra crossings - saw one do this and nearly ended up under an oncoming bus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having lights at night is compulsory for cyclists.... but i seem to be seeing more without than with so what chance have you got with making anything else compulsory?

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helmets on public highways should be mandatory for the same reasons that seatbelts are in cars.

 

Also agree that jumping red lights and zebra crossings should be severely punished

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although general evidence from around the worls is that compluisary helmets actually reduces the number of people cycling and therefore makes them less active and unhealthy in other way..i.e..fat.

 

There is no real evidence that helmet on roads prevents many serious deaths/accidents, . for eaxmple the guy killed at Stratford the bus went over his body, clearly they are effective at very high speeds..I always wear one (my trials helmet) when cross country riding and even more so when very high speed downhill riding (my full face one) (my GPS tells me I got upto 76 kph in the Alps).

 

Personally I think steps such as better road layouts, and educationg cyclists and drivers is more important that compulsary helmets, also worth nothing that most UK Bike organasiation dont support it either.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

May i ask why Royal Mail made it compulsory for their staff to wear helmets and the cost implication as well in providing PPE as an example if studies have showed that the use of helmets do not reduce, or prevent serious accidents

 

I have seen the official statistics from Royal Mail on the incidents on staff days lost through head injuries prior and post implementation of the compulsory use of cycle helmets, and why it became a conduct code issue through not wearing one.

 

Another example of compulsory helmet use would be the police and PCSO

 

Their must be official goverment statistics also on the serious injury reduction on wearing helmets and those not wearing

 

The use of helmets is for the protection of head trauma

 

The evidence and statistics from around the world that sugests that wearing compulsory helmets make people fat and less active is conjecture on who is actually doing the report

 

If official figure are avaliable to sustain any report then they need to be made avaliable

 

Unofficial reports can be extreamely biased as to who has the commission to make such a report

 

(LUCOZADE ENERGY DRINKS)

 

for example which has been proven to have absolutely no beneficial effect to athletes or the use of a certain brand of trainers to make you run faster

 

The biggest problem cyclists have on the roads today is the ignorance of other motorists and the dont care attitude

Edited by squaddie
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi.. bit late but thought I'd add my views.

 

I recently went to the aid of a cyclist who was cycling on the footpath at night and suffered a "blow out" with the front tyre, it shot him off the bike and he headbutted a brick garden wall, specifically the sharp corner of a brick post. :shock: Ouch...!

 

He was not wearing a helmet and suffered a deep cut to his forehead and what looked like a deep dent in his head, plenty of blood and he left a fair bit of skin on the post. My stomach turns a little everytime I walk past the scene and is now as I type this.. Thankfully or luckily he didn't suffer any long term effects as I have seen him since the accident and he's fine and all healed..

 

As a cyclist myself and having given up my car I have since started wearing a helmet and I am on my second after hitting a sandbag from a roadworks sign which was lying on a dark road. I went over the handlebars and hit my head hard on the road and because I was wearing the helmet I suffered nothing more than grazed hands and a few aches and bruises for a couple of days. I now wear a cycling helmet, scooter or paddock jacket which has armoured shoulders, elbows and back and gloves.

 

It might seem to some overkill wearing a scooter jacket with all the armour but it's great for cycling. 100% waterproof and windproof and is quite light and it really cuts down on the wind resistance as it fits really well and is fairly sturdy allowing the wind to pass over it rather than catch it and blow me around. It also has 3M reflective bands and is grey and white in colour allowing me to be seen more effectively. My confidence on the road is improved and I feel a better and safer cyclist with wearing the helmet, jacket and gloves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on where you are going and how confident you are and even how hot the weather is.

 

I do downhill mountain biking, and if I'm abroad in the Alps (Morzine, les Gets, etc) then 90% of the riders there are wearing full body armour, covering knees/shins, body, back, elbows and also gloves, full face helmet, googles and even a neck brace...now all of this would be considered a bit OTT for general trails riding in the uk..personally if going for a quick spin in the woods I'd wear my trails helmet and prob my D30 knee pads..(D30 is an amazing new invention, a thin flexible plastic that goes hard on impact).

 

Having said all that if I'm going for a quick ride along the seafront in the summer (remember that !?), Id prob just wear t-shirt n shorts, there is also evidence that drivers get closer to and take less care when overtaking a cyclist wearing a helmet.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get a lot of cycling clubs where I live and they all behave correctly on the roads, however most people don't. Cycling over pedestrian crossings is so annoying I just want to run the buggers over. Then when they are on the road and get to a red light they switch to the pavement. If we done that in a car we'd get done. They need to stick to the rules of the road before we start protecting them. I used to cycle a few hundred miles a week before my health went against me and I was knocked off 3 times when doing thing right!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...