Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

to appeal or not to appeal


rachmac83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello all,

 

i have recently had my DLA assesment and have been very lucky to receive HRM and LRC however i feel i meet the criteria for MRC which is also important to us so that my OH can clam carers allowance as now that he is at home with me we've realised how badly i was managing and how much it was affecting his health trying to work full time and care for me.

 

anyway the DWP's reason for not awarding me it is that with living aids my care needs would be reduced, but some of the aids are not suitable for me or my bed particularly. in addition to this last time dla told me i needed aids i went to the gp for help from the NHS and they literally laughed in my face. ive checked out the requirements for my local SS and seem to be under the threshold for help from them.

 

so although some of recommended aids could help me considerably i seem to have no way of obtaining them without purchasing them myself which is way out of my financial possibilities with esa and dla being our only income.

 

i don't know if its worth appealing and risking what ive already got when they are not really wrong in their idea of aids being helpful but its not realistic i fear at best it may be an effort in futility.

 

so what do you guys think is it worth the risk, and if anyone has any info on getting these aids it would be very much appreciated .

 

thanks guys

rach

The whole world is made of faith, trust and pixie dust :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a carefully drafted appeal is always worth trying...have you looked on the B&W website? They have good info on how to approach DLA applications and appeals....if the aids will only help a bit then you really need expert information to support that point of view.

 

And have you found out if there are any organisations around that may award one-off grants? I know we have one here....

 

Also has your partner joined a local carers group (Princess Royal Trust for Carers have groups all over and they often have advocates that can help), they give moral support but also have experience that may mean they know where you can go for help funding the aids....

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all,

 

i have recently had my DLA assesment and have been very lucky to receive HRM and LRC however i feel i meet the criteria for MRC which is also important to us so that my OH can clam carers allowance as now that he is at home with me we've realised how badly i was managing and how much it was affecting his health trying to work full time and care for me.

 

anyway the DWP's reason for not awarding me it is that with living aids my care needs would be reduced, but some of the aids are not suitable for me or my bed particularly. in addition to this last time dla told me i needed aids i went to the gp for help from the NHS and they literally laughed in my face. ive checked out the requirements for my local SS and seem to be under the threshold for help from them.

 

so although some of recommended aids could help me considerably i seem to have no way of obtaining them without purchasing them myself which is way out of my financial possibilities with esa and dla being our only income.

 

i don't know if its worth appealing and risking what ive already got when they are not really wrong in their idea of aids being helpful but its not realistic i fear at best it may be an effort in futility.

 

so what do you guys think is it worth the risk, and if anyone has any info on getting these aids it would be very much appreciated .

 

thanks guys

rach

 

The risk with an appeal is that you could lose part or all of your existing DLA award.

 

saying that, if you do appeal for middle rate care, there are things you can do to help.

 

You'll need to show that the aids mentioned are not reasonably avialable to you - maybe a letter from the doctor or OT. Then I would advise keeping a diary for a week, writing down every time your OH helps you with any personal care and what they help you with. You need to include the time and how long you're helped for each time. Frequency is the most important thing for daytime care. For night time care, I think you need help at least twice, or for at least 20 minutes.

 

write an appeal letter to go with the GL24, stating that the aids are unavailable to you on the NHS and you cannot afford to purchase them, therefore it is not reasonable to expect you to have those aids available to you when assessing your needs. State that as you have either frequent care needs during the day (or repeated or prolonged care needs at night, whichever is appropriate) as shown by your diary evidence.

 

Another thing that you can do is have ask your doctor if they will look at your diary and then (obviously only if they agree this is true) that the needs detaioled in your diary are as your doctor would expect from what he knows of your condition.

 

Hopefully that helps. There is risk, but only you can decide if the risk is worth it. There is far less risk of the DWP taking your existing award away, the risk is greatest in front of a Tribunal. I have known people go through the process with the DWP and then withdraw the appeal just before the Tribunal.

 

Of course the best way to know whether an appeal is worth it or not is to get advice from an experienced benefit adviser.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...